Earth isn't flat

Energy challenges are real -- but the solution lies in moderation

  • Follow Editorials

The most intemperate part of the global warming debate may be President Obama’s own rhetoric.

In announcing new executive-order restrictions on carbon emissions recently, the president ridiculed opponents in unbecomingly dismissive and condescending terms.

“I don’t have much patience for anyone who denies that this challenge is real,” he said. “We don’t have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society.”

But there’s apparently plenty of time to mock opponents, after nearly five years of inaction on the topic. Suddenly, we’re out of time to debate it, and if you don’t agree with him, you’re stupid anyway.

This is not the sort of rhetoric one normally would expect or want from a president of the United States.

That’s sad, particularly since there are many undecided and skeptical observers who might otherwise be persuaded one way or another by a more erudite – or just less disdainful – argument.

Many of those who remain skeptical – either of global warming or man’s role in it – are nonetheless willing to take reasonable steps to reduce pollution just in case the dire predictions ring true. The worst that happens under that scenario is that we clean up the planet a little.

Instead, there’s no room for disagreement, and those who seek moderation think the Earth is flat.

Syndicated columnist and apparent flat-Earther Charles Krauthammer said in response in that global temperatures have been flat for the past 16 years; the U.S. has reduced carbon dioxide emissions to 1992 levels, more than any other nation since 2006; and whatever we do, China and India alone continue to flip the switch on one new coal plant a week.

“Even if you believe in global warming,” Krauthammer said, “this is going to have zero effect on the climate.”

We wish it were going to have zero effect on the economy, but it’s likely to increase unemployment, cripple the nation’s coal industry and, as Krauthammer puts it, basically ship the industry overseas.

All through executive action – without the lift of a finger by Congress.

We do appreciate the president’s intentions. We all want a cleaner planet. No one wants that more than our kids; the nation’s young are especially supportive of the president’s plans.

Ironically, of course, no generation in history has used more electricity. And electricity has made their generation the most comfortable, wall-to-wall entertained generation in history as well.

But it has to come from somewhere. And while renewables are exciting and need to be brought online as quickly as possible, no one in any sector of the energy business believes they are anywhere close to fueling the bulk of our energy needs yet.

Mr. Obama’s actions are being called a “war on coal” – not just by Republicans, but by Democrats and – unbelievably – by the president’s own science adviser.

“It’s clear now that the president has declared a war on coal,” said Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.

“The one thing the president really needs to do now is to begin the process of shutting down the conventional coal plants,” Obama science adviser Daniel P. Schrag was briefly quoted in the New York Times. “Politically, the White House is hesitant to say they’re having a war on coal. On the other hand, a war on coal is exactly what’s needed.”

By all means, let’s unilaterally disarm in the Energy Race and leave the future to the Chinas and Russias of the world. How would our children like that?

We happen to think a more productive and less punitive course of action, rather than trying to regulate coal out of existence, would be for the federal government to incentivize and cheerlead and accelerate the development of alternative and renewable energy sources while not hindering production of existing sources of mass energy.

That’s not saying the Earth is flat. It’s merely saying there are different approaches to a problem.

Comments (42) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
corgimom
36662
Points
corgimom 07/15/13 - 09:44 pm
1
1
Correct me if I am wrong, but

Correct me if I am wrong, but when you refer to the President of the United States, aren't you supposed to capitalize the word "President", because it is a proper noun, referring to one specific person?

Same with "Federal", as in Federal government?

Darby
28353
Points
Darby 07/16/13 - 08:18 pm
2
1
Global warming/global cooling/climate

change are all real. Very real in fact and proven over millions and hundreds of millions of years.

On the other hand, man-made or even man-influenced warming/cooling/change is a more recent and totally political creation designed for consumption by the gullible for the benefit of the elite.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Monitor reports worsening Vogtle delays

Scheduling delays for two nuclear reactors under construction at Plant Vogtle are worsening, according to a report from a state-hired construction monitor.
Search Augusta jobs