Cuts are more like scratches

Obama administration fundamentally dishonest on sequestration

  • Follow Editorials

First things first: The Obama administration did not tell the truth when it claimed the automatic budget cuts known as “sequestration” came from somewhere else.

The president even baldly claimed not to be responsible for it in a debate last year.

The idea for sequestration – mandatory $85 billion in blunt, across-the-board budget cuts – came from the White House, as journalist Bob Woodward has reported and administration officials now meekly admit.

Secondly, President Obama flat-out said in a presidential debate that sequestration wouldn’t happen. In fact, it is set to occur Friday.

Thirdly, there can be no doubt that the effects of the cuts have been ridiculously exaggerated, and that all the president’s men will blame Republicans if they happen. In truth, as Woodward also notes, it’s the president who has changed the rules of the game: Rather than simply work with Republicans to find more acceptable budget cuts, the president is now requiring new taxes as well – after already getting Republicans to agree to tax increases on the wealthy earlier this year.

“So when the president asks that a substitute for the sequester include not just spending cuts but also new revenue, he is moving the goal posts,” Woodward wrote last week.

Yet, you can bet he’ll blame the opposition when the sequestration hits.

Maybe that’s what he’s always wanted anyway. Who knows?

Our own feeling is that a budget-cutting deal would be best. It would enable Congress and the White House to cut the budget artfully. Even so, if sequestration hits on Friday, it’s quite likely not going to be the catastrophe the White House has made it out to be.

We’ve been around the block a few times, and can tell you that when a government or government agency is tasked with cutting anything, they immediately propose cutting only that which you don’t want cut. They skip the fat and stab at the muscle to make you flinch. They want you to believe babies and saints will be bloodied, and that there’s absolutely no fat in any of their budgets.

What a truckload of hokum.

Just in January, the Government Accountability Office estimated in a year-end report by the Department of the Treasury that $108 billion was wasted in “improper payments” by the federal government in fiscal year 2012. Over the past couple of years, the GAO has also found over $400 billion in waste, in “duplicative, fragmented, inefficient programs.”

“Federal spending will explode from $3.6 trillion to $6 trillion over the next 10 years,” notes the Heritage Foundation think tank, “but the much-maligned sequester will cut only 2.4 percent of this spending.”

Michael Tanner, senior fellow at the Cato Institute think tank, wrote at CNN.com recently that only $44 billion of the $85 billion would actually be cut this year; the rest would be trimmed in future years. A Cato bar graph shows the contrast between the $3.6 trillion federal budget, the $845 billion deficit (borrowed money), the $224 billion we pay in interest, and the $44 billion in sequestration cuts. Those first three bars in the graph resemble a utility pole, a fence post and a stump, while the sequestration cuts look more like a floor mat.

The kind of floor mat that taxpayers have become.

“Actually, the sequester doesn’t cut federal spending at all, or rather it cuts it only in the Washington sense of any reduction from projected baseline increases is a cut,” Tanner wrote. “In reality, even if the sequester goes through, the federal government will spend more every single year. In fact, in 2023 it will be spending $2.39 trillion more than it does today (emphasis added).”

The Heritage Foundation chart below likewise illustrates what a pathetically thin stripe of austerity the dreaded sequester cuts are, compared to the mountain of spending they lay on.

And $85 billion in cuts would trigger the end of the world?

That’s what the president seemed to say last week, and what administration officials are claiming this week. In contrast, Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., suggested a hiring freeze and cutbacks in travel as a start.

And as far as we’re concerned, if budget officials can’t find the least painful cuts in federal agencies, they ought to be furloughed or fired themselves. We’re sick and tired of public officials protecting their turf – padded with our money – by
trying to scare us off with
draconian cuts that don’t have to be.

We’re not buying that $85 billion in cuts in a $3 trillion-plus budget will be a disaster. Except if the executive branch wants to make it one.

But let’s be clear about who’s doing it.

Comments (30) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
carcraft
25734
Points
carcraft 02/27/13 - 09:16 pm
1
0
Young Ferd LOL

Young Ferd LOL

Young Fred
17448
Points
Young Fred 02/27/13 - 10:03 pm
1
0
"Ridiculous" Yet another

"Ridiculous"

Yet another example of "don't even suggest the buck stops here!"

fedex227
11187
Points
fedex227 02/27/13 - 11:07 pm
3
1
“Where are the Obama supporters, defending him?”
Unpublished

“...I think I hear crickets”

It's called 'watching the other side self destruct', and it's sooooo fun to watch.

KSL
128641
Points
KSL 02/28/13 - 12:29 am
0
0
So is that what liberals have

So is that what liberals have been doing while continuing to blame Bush?

KSL
128641
Points
KSL 02/28/13 - 12:32 am
0
0
I find it interesting that

I find it interesting that Obama has done more of the same that Bush did without a peep of criticism from those who railed on Bush.

dichotomy
32672
Points
dichotomy 02/28/13 - 12:38 am
0
0
"It's called 'watching the

"It's called 'watching the other side self destruct', and it's sooooo fun to watch."

fedex....maybe you think we are self destructing but when the things we are warning about come true it won't be soooooo fun. And EVERYTHING the Republicans warned about Obama starting in 2008 have come true and NONE of them are good. Big spender, big taxer, big liar, big anti-business, big anti-success, big anti-constitution, and a big GUN GRABBER....oh, that's covered under big liar.

Young Fred
17448
Points
Young Fred 02/28/13 - 12:48 am
0
0
"It's called 'watching the

"It's called 'watching the other side self destruct', and it's sooooo fun to watch."

It's fun to a point. When they insist on dragging down the rest of the country with their inanities, it's not so fun anymore.

Young Fred
17448
Points
Young Fred 02/28/13 - 12:51 am
0
0
Dichotomy, it's true that

Dichotomy, it's true that this was all foretold by those paying attention.

Thing is people are prone to backing a losing horse to the bitter end. Something about ego and resentment, or so I'm told.

Young Fred
17448
Points
Young Fred 02/28/13 - 12:56 am
1
0
KSL, great point. Not only

KSL, great point.

Not only did they criticize Bush, they criticized (for good reason to an extent) him while thier man voted in the affirmatve. Then Obama comes along and doubles down.

Human nature is a fascinating thing to observe.

Bizkit
31230
Points
Bizkit 02/28/13 - 07:04 pm
0
0
Just reading an ABC poll

Just reading an ABC poll about public sentiment towards Obama and Rep over this debacle. The spin now is everybody is mad at the Prez and REp-just they are more mad at the GOP. The difference was 20 somethin percent or really who cares. Now my head is spinnin' finding the silver lining behind this storm cloud. It's who do hate more now. Jeez. They polled 1,500 people and the error was +/- 3-5% or somethin'. My bet the polling and statistics are valid just they polled a predominately Dem district hee,hee,hee. The media is so sold out they will find anything positive to say about the Prez even though it is a negative. Oh what a twisted wicked web we weave. I know Obama and the Dems really believe they will be able to twist this in their favor=regardless of the truth who is really the one orchestrating it all =the Dems. We need to end the monopoly of government-it is a organization that needs to go bankrupt (their morally bankrupt already)and it isn't too big to fail -because it already has failed us all. Seems our votes mean nothing-cause I really doubt most Dems really bargain for Obama to be so ruthless, secretive, divisive, and weak. I know many progressive women who are worried Obama is over reaching his authority and power-becaue that was not something they bargained for=yes my reproductive rights but stop with breaking with the balance of power. We see fair to Obama is just capriciously enforcing some laws he likes and ignoring other laws he doesn't like or he belives his interest groups will not like.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs