Growing defiance

More citizens ignoring federal law -- much like the federal government

  • Follow Editorials

You may have heard the word “nullification” bandied about recently. It’s basically a fancy word for ignoring a law.

Juries sometimes do it, if they think enforcement of a law will result in an injustice. Merriam-Webster defines nullification as “the action of a state impeding or attempting to prevent the operation and enforcement within its territory of a law of the United States.”

And now, increasing numbers of sheriffs and others across the country are publicly saying they will engage in nullification if faced by federal gun or health-care laws they find unconstitutional.

Ignoring laws is rarely a good thing. We’d say never – but we’re reminded of Rosa Parks’ and other civil rights icons’ peaceful defiance of the immoral laws and customs of segregation.

An increasing number of folks are no less convinced that Washington is trampling on other civil rights.

Sheriffs in Idaho, Oregon and Texas have announced their intent not to go along with expected gun control laws. Other officials have said they won’t enforce the health-care law. A state representative in Tennessee wants to make it a crime to enforce gun or ammunition bans in that state.

And several hundred gathered at the South Carolina capitol recently for a “Nullify Obamacare” rally. They were promised efforts by several state officials to block “federal encroachment.”

There’s a proud tradition of states’ rights in South Carolina – exemplified not that long ago by the light bulb. When federal law began phasing out production of the incandescent light bulb, South Carolina lawmakers passed “The Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act” to allow for its production and sale within the state, which Washington can’t prevent.

But nullification has rarely seen this much favor since the Civil War, and may only gain steam if Washington continues down the path of trying to run everyone’s lives.

Washington may have no one but itself to blame for the rise of the nullification movement – particularly the Obama administration, which has set the standard for ignoring the law.

It was this administration, after all, that decided not to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act. Even though the “Dream Act” can’t pass Congress, Mr. Obama “enacted” it via executive order – announcing that his administration would not deport illegal aliens who came here as minors. There is no such exception in the law.

His administration also announced that marijuana crimes would not be a “priority” – again, picking and choosing which laws to enforce.

When it appeared the defense industry might have to issue layoff notices to workers because of impending “sequestration” cuts just before the November election, the Obama administration encouraged contractors to ignore the law that seemed to require the notices.

The Obama administration also tried to block enforcement of state anti-voter-fraud laws last year.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Senate has failed to pass a budget as required by law the past four years – and the Obama administration has announced it won’t have a federal budget ready by the statutory deadline.

We don’t endorse the ignoring of laws. But if there’s a growing sentiment of defiance toward enforcement of federal laws in the land, Washington can’t exactly throw stones.

It has perfected the art.

Comments (69) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
harley_52 01/28/13 - 09:32 pm
The Military Is Sworn.... "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic and to bear true faith and allegiance to the same...."

The oath goes on to say ".... that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

That language might present a dilemma, but soldiers know they have a duty to disobey illegal orders. An order to violate the Constitution and/or to kill otherwise law abiding citizens would be (in my opinion) widely disobeyed.

Riverman1 01/28/13 - 10:12 pm
Good Point Harley

The military is taught to disobey illegal orders. It seems clear if a president violates the Constitution it's an illegal order.

My point is unless the liberals can muster enough support to change the Constitution they are breaking the law with various administrative infringements. The fact is they will never be able to change the Constitution concerning the Second Amendment and that angers them to no end.

harley_52 01/28/13 - 10:42 pm
" The fact is they will never be able to....

.... change the Constitution concerning the Second Amendment and that angers them to no end."

Yes, it angers them, and because it does, it gives them cause to look for a way around it. So, they choose to use "Executive Orders," United Nations Treaties, and laws that chip away at Second Amendment rights.

No matter what methods they choose to attempt an Unconstitutional gun grab, I think the citizenry will resist, many to the point of armed (if necessary) defiance.

All the talk we hear of people who insist they won't give up their guns is not idle bluster. People are serious. I think the Administration knows it. Also, I think when it's all said and done, little will happen. Most Senators and Congressmen know their next election depends on how they vote on legislation attempting to diminish their constituents' Second Amendment rights.

Techfan 01/29/13 - 02:12 am
Darby 01/29/13 - 02:16 am
"Some of ya'll think way to much.....

...of yourselves."

There you go again, trying to write while looking in the mirror.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs
Top headlines
Augusta VA supervisor sentenced to prison
In what the judge called a "tragic case," a former Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center supervisor was sentenced Thursday to 27 months in federal prison for making false statements in medical files.