Right man, right time

Schwarzkopf remembered as modern military hero

  • Follow Editorials

He may have channeled the no-nonsense fighting spirit and know-how of Gen. George S. Patton. He might have been this generation’s Dwight D. Eisenhower – a military hero-turned president – if he’d had the personal ambition.

He sure had the popularity.

Instead, Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf pulled a Douglas MacArthur – and faded away.

From the spotlight, anyway. The military hero of the first Gulf War spent his twilight years quietly helping children and charities before his passing last Thursday at 78.

It’s difficult to overstate Schwarzkopf’s importance to modern U.S. military history.

The Gulf War of 1991 was this country’s first major ground assault since the Vietnam War – and we all know how that one ended. The United States desperately needed a confidence boost, the clarity of a decisive end, and as few coalition casualties as possible.

In addition, we were taking on one of the world’s most unscrupulous, unbalanced bullies, a would-be Hitler, and the mother of all trash-talkers in Saddam Hussein.

And was it just us, or did it strike you that the media at the time fell all over themselves to constantly lavish the word “elite” on Saddam’s “Republican Guard” forces? Good grief.

Well, Schwarzkopf showed the world just who was elite.

There are probably two kinds of military heroes: the men who risk life and limb for their country and countrymen, and those visionary leaders who successfully command them. Norman Schwarzkopf was both kinds, having earned three Silver Stars for valor, a Bronze Star, a Purple Heart and more in Vietnam.

The prosecution of the first Gulf War has been criticized for allowing Saddam to remain in power, and for giving him a long-enough leash to create the need for a second Gulf War. But Schwarzkopf didn’t have authorization to do any more than liberate Kuwait and a good chunk of the world’s oil supply, and he did that masterfully and with a minimum loss of life.

Moreover, it was an inept and thoroughly corrupt United Nations that helped Saddam recover (see: Oil for Food scandal).

Perhaps the most enduring memory of the ’91 war was when then-Joint Chiefs Chairman Colin Powell explained the 30-nation coalition strategy in attacking the Iraqi army: “First we’re going to cut it off, and then we’re going to kill it.”

The ambiguity of the first Gulf War’s end wasn’t Schwarzkopf’s doing. Rather, he lent America’s all-volunteer Armed Forces a clarity and John Wayne-style swagger that cut off and killed any of the country’s remaining self-doubt from the Vietnam era.

He was, as any hero, the right man at the right time.

Comments (6) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Riverman1 12/31/12 - 07:42 am

Taps for a good soldier and man.

seenitB4 12/31/12 - 09:41 am
We need more like him..

But they are so few & so hard to find...

nofanofobama 12/31/12 - 09:59 am
we need more americans like

we need more americans like norm..sacrifice for the betterment of our country unlike the slime we have in DC now.

Jane18 12/31/12 - 12:18 pm
"Few and Far Between Good Men............"

I appreciate everyone that has ever fought a war for America and for the betterment of other people, but there are few and far between men as Gen, Schwarzkopf, Eisenhower, Patton and some others when it comes to being a leader and a good person. I was very sad to hear of his death and know that heroic leader and a very good man was gone.

harley_52 12/31/12 - 03:28 pm
The MacArthur Analogy Is An Apt One...

Both men held the military advantage at the instant in history where, with the permission of the politicians, they could have defeated their enemy and permanently altered world history. In both cases, the political leadership lacked the guts to WIN the war.

General Schwartzkopf was a fine man and a great military leader. The world is a better place because of him and a worse place without him.

Young Fred
Young Fred 12/31/12 - 11:10 pm
“Both men held the military

“Both men held the military advantage at the instant in history where, with the permission of the politicians, they could have defeated their enemy and permanently altered world history. In both cases, the political leadership lacked the guts to WIN the war.”

And doesn't that just seem to be the status quo? Politicians “spending” our young men and women like so much chum? I hate to be crass, but if you commit us to a war, then we should be going “all out with everything we have”.

It just sickens me to see our children used like pawns. Schwarzkopf was a man's man. He understood the sewer that is Washington DC, and he did the best he could with his hands tied.

I'm with Harley on this one, there is just no telling what could have been accomplished. At a minimum, if this man had a chance he may very well have altered history. We'll never know because the twits in charge control the information.

General, we remember. Pop culture may not give you your due, but those of us that understand will be forever grateful.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs