House passes 'fiscal cliff' bill

Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013 11:06 PM
Last updated Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013 12:55 AM
  • Follow Latest News

WASHINGTON — Past its own New Year's deadline, a weary Congress sent President Barack Obama legislation to avoid a national "fiscal cliff" of middle class tax increases and spending cuts late Tuesday night in the culmination of a struggle that strained America's divided government to the limit.

The bill's passage on a bipartisan 257-167 vote in the House sealed a hard-won political triumph for the president less than two months after he secured re-election while calling for higher taxes on the wealthy.

Moments later, Obama strode into the White House briefing room and declared, "Thanks to the votes of Republicans and Democrats in Congress I will sign a law that raises taxes on the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans while preventing tax hikes that could have sent the economy back into recession."

He spoke with Vice President Joe Biden at his side, a recognition of the former senator's role as the lead Democratic negotiator in final compromise talks with Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

In addition to neutralizing middle class tax increases and spending cuts taking effect with the new year, the legislation will raise tax rates on incomes over $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for couples. That was higher than the thresholds of $200,000 and $250,000 that Obama campaigned for. But remarkably, in a party that swore off tax increases two decades ago, dozens of Republicans supported the bill at both ends of the Capitol.

The Senate approved the measure on a vote of 89-8 less than 24 hours earlier, and in the interim, rebellious House conservatives demanded a vote to add significant spending cuts to the measure. But in the end they retreated.

The measure split the upper ranks of the Republican leadership in the House.

Speaker John Boehner of Ohio voted in favor, while Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia and California Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the party's whip, opposed the bill. Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the party's 2012 vice presidential candidate, supported the measure.

Supporters of the bill in both parties expressed regret that it was narrowly drawn, and fell far short of a sweeping plan that combined tax changes and spending cuts to reduce federal deficits. That proved to be a step too far in the two months since Obama called congressional leaders to the White House for a postelection stab at compromise.

Already, both sides were maneuvering for the next round in a seemingly ceaseless struggle about taxes and spending.

In a statement after the vote, Boehner said, "Now the focus turns to spending. The American people re-elected a Republican majority in the House, and we will use it in 2013 to hold the president accountable for the 'balanced' approach he promised, meaning significant spending cuts and reforms to the entitlement programs that are driving our country deeper and deeper into debt."

Majority Republicans did their best to minimize the bill's tax increases, just as they abandoned their demand from earlier in the day to add spending cuts to the package.

"By making Republican tax cuts permanent, we are one step closer to comprehensive tax reform that will help strengthen our economy and create more and higher paychecks for American workers," said Rep. Dave Camp of Michigan, chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee.

He urged a vote for passage to "get us one step closer to tax reform in 2013" as well as attempts to control spending.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi also said the legislation included "permanent tax relief for the middle class," and she summoned lawmakers to provide bipartisan support as the Senate did.

The bill would also prevent an expiration of extended unemployment benefits for an estimated 2 million jobless, block a 27 percent cut in fees for doctors who treat Medicare patients, stop a $900 pay increase for lawmakers from taking effect in March and head off a threatened spike in milk prices.

It would stop $24 billion in across-the-board spending cuts set to take effect over the next two months, although only about half of that total would be offset with savings elsewhere in the budget.

The economic as well as political stakes were considerable.

Economists have warned that without action by Congress, the tax increases and spending cuts that technically took effect with the new year could send the economy into recession.

Even with enactment of the legislation, taxes are on the rise for millions.

A 2 percentage point temporary cut in the Social Security payroll tax, originally enacted two years ago to stimulate the economy, expired with the end of 2012. Neither Obama nor Republicans made a significant effort to extend it.

House Republicans spent much of the day struggling to escape a political corner they found themselves in.

"I personally hate it," Rep. John Campbell of California, said of the measure, giving voice to the concern of many Republicans that it did little or nothing to cut spending.

"The speaker the day after the election said we would give on taxes and we have. But we wanted spending cuts. This bill has spending increases. Are you kidding me? So we get tax increases and spending increases? Come on."

Cantor told reporters at one point, "I do not support the bill. We are looking, though, for the best path forward."

Within hours, Republicans abandoned demands for changes and agreed to a simple yes-or-no vote on the Senate-passed bill.

They feared that otherwise the Senate would refuse to consider any alterations, sending the bill into limbo and saddling Republicans with the blame for a whopping middle class tax increase. One Senate Democratic leadership aide said Majority Leader Harry Reid would "absolutely not take up the bill" if the House changed it. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity, citing a requirement to keep internal deliberations private.

Despite Cantor's remarks, Boehner took no public position in advance of voting the bill as he sought to negotiate a conclusion to the final crisis of a two-year term full of them.

The brief insurrection wasn't the first time that the tea party-infused House Republican majority has rebelled against the party establishment since the GOP took control of the chamber 24 months ago. But with the two-year term set to end Thursday at noon, it was likely the last. And as was true in earlier cases of a threatened default and government shutdown, the brinkmanship came on a matter of economic urgency, leaving the party open to a public backlash if tax increases do take effect on tens of millions.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said the measure would add nearly $4 trillion over a decade to federal deficits, a calculation that assumed taxes would otherwise have risen on taxpayers at all income levels. There was little or no evident concern among Republicans on that point, presumably because of their belief that tax cuts pay for themselves by expanding economic growth and do not cause deficits to rise.

The relative paucity of spending cuts was a sticking point with many House Republicans. Among other items, the extension of unemployment benefits costs $30 billion, and is not offset by savings elsewhere.

Others said unhappiness over spending outweighed fears that the financial markets would plunge on Wednesday if the fiscal cliff hadn't been averted.

"There's a concern about the markets, but there's a bigger concern, which is getting this right, which is something we haven't been very good at over the past two years," said Rep. Steve LaTourette of Ohio.

For all the struggle involved in the legislation, even its passage merely cleared the way for another round of controversy almost as soon as the new Congress convenes.

With the Treasury expected to need an expansion in borrowing authority by early spring, and funding authority for most government programs set to expire in late March, Republicans have made it clear they intend to use those events as leverage with the administration to win savings from Medicare and other government benefit programs.

McConnell said as much moments before the 2 a.m. Tuesday vote in the Senate — two hours after the advertised "cliff" deadline.

"We've taken care of the revenue side of this debate. Now it's time to get serious about reducing Washington's out-of-control spending," he said. "That's a debate the American people want. It's the debate we'll have next. And it's a debate Republicans are ready for."

Obama addressed the same point in his brief remarks. He said he is prepared to take steps to control spending this year, and noted pointedly that savings must be found in Medicare. "I believe that there's further unnecessary spending in government that we can eliminate," he said.

Countering McConnell and other Republicans, the president said future legislation must combine additional revenues and spending cuts, and he warned the GOP not to try and use the expiration of the Treasury's borrowing authority to force spending cuts.

The 89-8 vote in the Senate was unexpectedly lopsided.

Despite grumbling from liberals that Obama had given way too much in the bargaining, only three Democrats opposed the measure.

Among the Republican supporters were Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, an ardent opponent of tax increases, as well as Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, elected to his seat two years ago with tea party support.

Comments (15) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
seenitB4
85290
Points
seenitB4 01/02/13 - 07:52 am
5
0
Believe it when I see it...

"We've taken care of the revenue side of this debate. Now it's time to get serious about reducing Washington's out-of-control spending," he said. "That's a debate the American people want. It's the debate we'll have next. And it's a debate Republicans are ready for."

griff6035
3950
Points
griff6035 01/02/13 - 07:56 am
6
0
Bill Passage

Why do we keep re-electing these same do nothing People.

southern2
6008
Points
southern2 01/02/13 - 08:00 am
7
2
Obama's victory is America's

Obama's victory is America's defeat! He has succeeded in conquering our last political stronghold, the People's House. He worked so hard this week it's time to fuel the jet and fly back to Hawaii for another vacation. All this drama and we're still on his first term!

CobaltGeorge
155147
Points
CobaltGeorge 01/02/13 - 08:27 am
6
1
Yep!

He has been given an Inch, he will now seek the Mile.

OpenCurtain
10049
Points
OpenCurtain 01/02/13 - 08:54 am
7
0
I am old enought to remember.

When Congress met and passed laws in the light of the days and not in the wee hours to hide the shame of their actions from the voters.

oneofthesane
2201
Points
oneofthesane 01/02/13 - 09:24 am
5
3
Not bad.
Unpublished

Not bad....not bad....but I don't make 400k a year, so just my opinion. This is only 1/2 the battle but I think it was pretty fair. I want to see how the cutting-spending thing goes. Obama is a big spender of other ppl's dough, so interested to see how that goes. This is why Republicans are necessary.....common sense. Bring in more revenue, cut massive overspending equalls getting out of the hole.....eventually...smh

southern2
6008
Points
southern2 01/02/13 - 09:50 am
4
3
Oneofthesame....Not bad? This

Oneofthesame....Not bad? This "deal" will add roughly $4 trillion to the deficit and increase taxes for 77% of American households because a 2 percent payroll tax cut, enacted during the economic slowdown, is being allowed to expire as well as well as a tax increase on Social Security. Good news though...it does give substantial tax breaks to NASCAR, Hollywood, rum producers, algae growers, and electric motorcycle makers.

dichotomy
32023
Points
dichotomy 01/02/13 - 10:35 am
5
3
Just another example of what

Just another example of what you get when the Democrats are in charge. Raise $650 billion in new taxes and spend it before you get it. I see Hollywood get their payoff of $248 million in "incentives". And algae growers got about $50 million.

Okay Dims...you got your tax increase on the wealthy so you can quit drooling and frothing now. Now tell us where the other half of the "balanced approach" is and how you are going to pay the bills. You just raised taxes and added another $4 trillion in debt.

tax....SPEND.....tax.....SPEND......tax......SPEND

Young Fred
16597
Points
Young Fred 01/02/13 - 10:44 am
4
1
Jokers and thieves!!!

Jokers and thieves!!!

Humble Angela
41338
Points
Humble Angela 01/02/13 - 01:27 pm
7
2
I'm a proud member of the 78%
Unpublished

I'm a proud member of the 78% that got their taxes raised this year. Those who think taxes only went up on the wealthy will be disappointed when they see their first paycheck this year.

oneofthesane
2201
Points
oneofthesane 01/02/13 - 02:23 pm
0
5
I'm Sorry Southerntoo....77% of American households....
Unpublished

I tend to live in reality. Never said I liked it. Perfect world NEVER. it was 100% or 77%.....let see.....which to choose, which to choose. smh. I will accept reality, while you wait on the perfect world.

Humble Angela
41338
Points
Humble Angela 01/02/13 - 03:16 pm
5
2
oneofthesame....how do you
Unpublished

oneofthesame....how do you figure it was 77% or 100%? Every single tax payer will see their taxes go up........What option would have made 100% of the people see a tax increase?

nofanofobama
6809
Points
nofanofobama 01/02/13 - 03:26 pm
7
1
a bad deal is a bad

a bad deal is a bad deal..senate had a whole 3 minutes to read about 150 pages of bill...what happened to obamas promise on 3-days etcc..posting it on internet..live debates***just like every other promise those thieves in dc tell us..obumlers latest bits of wisdom..we cant cut ourselves to prosperity...therefore since he already calling for more taxes next year its logical to assume that he believes we can tax ourselves into prosperity. to those who believe its better to take the deal now...well any deal can be retroactive to 1-1-2013....and why does our commander in campaigner not set an example by reducing HIS expense to set an example for us who have to sacrfice daily for DC and the 47 percenters..the can is kicked down the road only problem is that the cliff will be higher, time is shorter and the pain will be greater on the day of reckoning.

oneofthesane
2201
Points
oneofthesane 01/02/13 - 05:29 pm
2
2
Humple Angela.......how do you figure it was 77% or 100%
Unpublished

"The U.S. leader said if Congress does nothing, the taxes of every U.S. household will increase automatically on January 1." equalls 100%

"Obama urged Republicans in the House of Representative to vote in favor of the plan that protects the middle class by preventing a tax hike on the first $250,000 of everybody's income." equalls NOT 100%

"The plan maintains tax cuts for those earning less than $400,000/year and couples earning less than $450,000/year. Those individuals earning more will see increased tax rates." equalls NOT 100%

What am I missing here?

CobaltGeorge
155147
Points
CobaltGeorge 01/02/13 - 06:24 pm
2
2
Link Too Long To C&P

but not even the most dedicated Liberal Lover of the Hammer & Sickle Man can't debunk one of their most hated man's words on the real truth of the 'fiscal cliff'.

Liberals, do you dare to read.

http://www.boortz.com/weblogs/nealz-nuze/2013/jan/02/obamas-psychotic-ob...

omnomnom
3964
Points
omnomnom 01/02/13 - 08:11 pm
1
0
they kicked the can down the

they kicked the can down the road again.

oh well.

Willow Bailey
20580
Points
Willow Bailey 01/02/13 - 08:18 pm
2
1
Print some more monoply

Print some more monoply money.. the money tree dried up.

KSL
126283
Points
KSL 01/02/13 - 08:35 pm
2
1
An obvious hypocrit

Obama could have led by example. If he didn't think that as a rich person himself, he was paying enough, he could have voluntarily paid extra tax. Also, to save taxpayers' money, he and his family could take far less lavish vacations.

Willow Bailey
20580
Points
Willow Bailey 01/02/13 - 09:29 pm
1
1
Not to mention, fewer of

Not to mention, fewer of them.

Humble Angela
41338
Points
Humble Angela 01/03/13 - 07:55 am
2
1
oneofthesame.... the number
Unpublished

oneofthesame.... the number of households that pay taxes is not 100%, so there wouldn't be an increase on 100% of the households. That is the point I'm making. Payroll tax went up for 100% of TAXPAYERS, not 100% of households.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs