AP Interview: Perdue, Kingston talk immigration

  • Follow Metro

ATLANTA — The Asso­cia­ted Press sat down recently with the two Republicans competing for Georgia’s open Senate seat to discuss three key issues.

Rep. Jack Kingston (left) and former Dollar General CEO David Perdue both said they oppose "amnesty" for people in the U.S. illegally. Both said they would have voted against an immigration reform bill that cleared the Senate but won't get a House vote.  FILE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
FILE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Rep. Jack Kingston (left) and former Dollar General CEO David Perdue both said they oppose "amnesty" for people in the U.S. illegally. Both said they would have voted against an immigration reform bill that cleared the Senate but won't get a House vote.

Rep. Jack Kingston of Sa­vannah and former Dollar Gen­eral CEO David Perdue will meet in a runoff July 22, and the winner will face Democrat Michelle Nunn in the fall.

Below is a discussion on comprehensive immigration reform and a bill that passed last year in the Senate but has since stalled. Remarks have been edited in some places for length.

Q: Would you have voted for or against the bipartisan immigration reform bill that passed
in the Senate last year?

Kingston: I would have voted no. I do not support amnesty, and there is not a political consensus for comprehensive immigration reform. There is the possibility for increment reform with, I think, four basic tenants. No. 1,
no amnesty. No. 2, securing the border first. No. 3, no welfare for illegal aliens. And then No. 4, cracking down on those who knowingly hire.

Perdue: I would not have, and the reason is – there are several reasons. One, it had an amnesty in there that I didn’t support. Secondly, it gave the head of the national homeland security discretion over enforcing the laws related to the border. My feeling on this thing is, in business, when you get a complicated problem, we break it down into its components. And the first component is to secure the border.

Q: As you just mentioned, you are against amnesty for the estimated 11 million people living in the U.S. without legal status. Do you believe they can and should be immediately deported? And if not, what would you propose the federal government do if not offer a pathway to citizenship?

Kingston: If you enforce existing laws, which would be part of the crackdown on those who knowingly hire, I think a lot of this works its way out. People would actually be inclined to leave on their own. They are very used to passing back and forth in the border.

But we have to make a philosophical decision, are we a nation of laws? And any time you relax your immigration laws or interpretations of those laws, you get an influx of new illegals because word of mouth, people are watching, what is the policy of the White House? And in this case, what is it this year versus last year?

Case in point of the children who have come over now from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. That was because of an Obama administration change in policy, and the policy change did not address Mexican children. So Mexican children are being turned around immediately and Honduran kids are not. It was a crisis created by the White House.

Perdue: The Senate bill was over 1,000 pages, and it laid all of this stuff out and gives everybody a reason to not do it, and here we are months later with nothing going on. I think the first thing we need to do is get a bipartisan agreement on the first component, and let’s secure this border. It’s a national security issue. And frankly we’re all being irresponsible for not doing it.

And it’s not just Mexico. It’s Canada, it’s the ports, it’s the airports. This is a very open country. And with the technology we are seeing in terrorists’ hands right now, we should all be concerned. … Right now we are bringing in over 1.1 million legal immigrants, and that is over twice the high-water marks of the 1880s to the 1920s and even during the Reagan era, it’s more than twice. We have got to address the different components of that to see what is the right number, whether getting back to 500-600,000 is the right number. What is the right number? Nobody is talking about that. And look, I believe that when you secure the border then you can enter into a dialogue around what do you do about the people that are here.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
hoptoad
9573
Points
hoptoad 07/05/14 - 07:53 am
3
0
Talk is cheap

Let's see some action!

seenitB4
87178
Points
seenitB4 07/05/14 - 08:26 am
3
1
Exactly hoptoad

Talk is cheap...what I was thinking too...

We have heard these words OVER & OVER!!!! Write to your congressman...

jimmymac
39731
Points
jimmymac 07/05/14 - 10:53 am
1
0
ILLEGALS
Unpublished

Unfortunately both party's want illegals in this country contrary to their rhetoric. Republican's business people want an access to cheap labor and Democrats want an access to ignorant voters. That's the reason neither party when in power have done anything to stop the flow of illegals into this country for the last forty years. The illegals know it and the flood is getting worse.

cush1944
8283
Points
cush1944 07/05/14 - 01:53 pm
2
0
There should be NO

There should be NO immigration reform until the borders are security.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs