Georgia city loosens gun-owning law

  • Follow Metro

ATLANTA — A Georgia city is backing off its law that required heads of households to own a gun and ammunition, which leaders said was meant to warn would-be burglars and to send a message to the federal government about gun ownership.

The city council in Nelson, a city of about 1,300 residents 50 miles north of Atlanta, passed the Family Protection Ordinance on April 1. About a month later, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence filed a federal lawsuit against the city and council members challenging its constitutionality.

In a joint court filing Thursday, the Brady Center and the city submitted a settlement agreement to the federal judge in Gainesville. The city agreed to add language saying the law is not enforceable, that it will not be enforced and that anyone who violates it will not be subject to any penalty.

“We’re very pleased with the settlement,” said lawyer Jonathan Lowy of the Washington-based Brady Center. “We were able to accomplish everything we wanted to in this lawsuit.”

City manager Brandy Edwards said the city had no comment on the settlement and confirmed no one had been charged under the ordinance.

The measure requires every head of household to own a gun and ammunition to “provide for the emergency management of the city” and to “provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants.”

The ordinance exempted convicted felons, those who can’t afford a gun and those who suffer from certain physical or mental disabilities, as well as anyone who conscientiously objects to owning guns because of their beliefs or religious doctrine.

City leaders and the police chief, the only law enforcement officer in town, said during the meeting when the ordinance was passed that they had no intention of enforcing it.

The Brady Center argued that someone who doesn’t conscientiously oppose gun ownership but who doesn’t want to own a weapon wouldn’t be exempt and that would be a violation of the person’s constitutional rights. The national gun control group also argued there was no guarantee that the ordinance wouldn’t be enforced in the future.

The Brady Center also sought to discourage other municipal governments from following Nelson’s lead.

“Nelson clearly saw the writing on the wall, and hopefully this will be a message to other communities that consider enacting this sort of misguided legislation,” Lowy said.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
nocnoc 08/24/13 - 07:09 am
Gun Laws

Yes I am Pro firearm ownership.

But it is a choice I made based on events, work related issues and my general environment.

Having a law that requires people to own a firearm rubs me wrong.

Although Kennesaw crime statistics have shown it seems to help.

We are a country that allows freedom of choice. If a person has a valid moral objection or makes a choice to do something guaranteed under the Bill of Rights, that is their choice, not a City's, State's, nor Federal Governments. If the Anti- (insert any subject) crowd would adhere to this logical philosophy and quit trying to IMPOSE their will on others.

Maybe, just maybe we could find time to put America back together.

David Parker
David Parker 08/26/13 - 08:32 am
right message

wrong implementation

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs