Augusta Economy

More News | Fort Gordon | Plant Vogtle | Savannah River Site | Editor

Deal reached on Vogtle cost overruns

Wednesday, July 31, 2013 3:53 PM
Last updated 9:22 PM
  • Follow Business

ATLANTA — Southern Co. has agreed to drop its request to raise its construction budget for Plant Vogtle and will instead seek permission to recover that money as it spends on the massive project, utility CEO Tom Fanning said Wednesday.


If approved, the agreement would raise the financial risk on Southern Co. as it tries to control the costs of building two more nuclear reactors at the plant.

Regulators in Georgia review construction spending in six-month intervals and decide whether those costs can be passed along to utility customers. Under the preliminary deal, Southern Co. subsidiary Georgia Power would drop its request to raise the total project budget by $737 million to a total of $6.85 billion.

Instead, the utility would only seek approval right now for $209 million it spent on the project for the six-month period ending in December. Going forward, the utility would seek approval of its costs on a similar schedule.

The agreement allows Southern Co. to avoid publicly disclosing information about construction issues that are the subject of negotiations between Vogtle’s owners and the firms that designed and are building the reactors. Those firms want Southern Co. and other plant owners to pay more than $900 million in extra charges stemming mostly from licensing delays. Southern Co. and the other owners deny they are responsible for those charges.

But the change shifts more financial risk onto Southern Co. If spending is below an approved budget, Georgia regulators must legally assume the utility’s spending is legally prudent – and, therefore, can be passed along to customers – unless it can be proven otherwise. But if Southern Co. exceeds the construction budget, the burden is on the company to show its spending is allowable.

The deal is still subject to approval by the elected members of Georgia’s Public Service Commission. Fanning said a vote is expected in October.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Jake
36863
Points
Jake 07/31/13 - 05:26 pm
0
0
?

And just how is this good for the consumers of Georgia Power? Public disclosure of construction issues might be a very good thing, especially when talking about nuclear reactors.

resident
501
Points
resident 08/02/13 - 11:30 am
0
0
I agree on disclosure

Since we are footing the bill for this thing in our power bills now I think we deserve the ability to know how our contribution is being spent. I also think that the utility should eat it out of their profits since they failed to control the costs. They should not be allowed to pass this on to the consumer. This should be a lesson in stop filling pockets at the expense of others and manage what you have better.

Back to Top
loading...
Top headlines

Fort Gordon Warrior Transition Battalion closing

Fort Gordon's Warrior Transition Battalion, the second-largest in the Army, is one of 10 military medical units nationwide that will be closed by August 2016, as the number of sick and injured ...
Search Augusta jobs