John GogickExecutive Editor for The Augusta Chronicle. | E-mail

# The news runs on pennies

In the 1990s, every night as the press rolled and the newsroom got the first editions of the newspaper, City Editor Mac Hill would hold up the front page and ask aloud, “Well, is it worth 50 cents today?”

It was Mac’s audible reminder that every edition of the newspaper comes with a value equation: Had the sum total of our day’s labors produced a product worth the price of admission?

The cost has kept up with the times – like everything else in this world. One year ago this week, The Augusta Chronicle raised its price for home delivery 85 cents a week.

Mac’s question remains: Does each reader know each day that he got his money’s worth?

Being an editor by trade but a math lover at heart, I would challenge Mac with the following line of questioning.

If the cover price is \$1, then each section costs 25 cents. So what Mac should have been asking is: Is today’s A section worth a quarter? What about Metro? Sports? Classified?

But, Mac, my argument would often continue, if there are six pages in each section, then was each page worth the 4 cents?

Furthermore, was each story on the front page worth the penny the reader paid for it?

In the modern age, people say news should be free in an Internet world. News has always been nearly free. Less than a penny per story.

Is Sylvia Cooper’s City Ink column worth a penny? How about Bill Kirby’s columns? Rick McKee’s cartoons?

Are the Wall Street Jour­nal pages in the Sunday Business section worth 8 cents? Is the Sunday Opinion section, just more than a year old, worth 72 cents a month?

So, when Public Service Editor Mike Wynn comes and asks me whether we can spend \$275 on the records for the sheriff’s funeral fund, I like to ask the question: Will the readers think it was worth the penny they paid for it?

And over this past year, your renewal notices have arrived. Seven-day subscriptions are about \$20 a month – about 66 cents a day.

With that notice in hand, you asked the heart of Mac’s questions: Is it worth it? Should I renew?

For me, the answer to every question above is: “Yes.”

Yes to Mac. And yes to Sylvia. And yes to my math. And to the stories. And the pages. And the renewal. The Opinion section. The public records. The Wall Street Journal pages.

When we raised the price last year, we turned off most of the free access to our digital products.

But as print subscribers, you have already paid for the stories, one penny at a time, and you should experience their digital enhancements, too.

Enhancements such as photos, videos and databases are yours by registering. If you haven’t signed up to access these products, go to augustachronicle.com and click on the orange button on the right-hand side that says “Activate.”

ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
158311
Points
07/13/13 - 11:24 am
2
0

I suppose, but they should pay at least a nickel to read the readers’ comments. Where else can you see people going manic in print over the most trivial matters? It’s not an easy life we commenters lead.

Many professionals are trying to get a handle on this interaction with newspapers online and they are still grasping. Many commenters will tell you all newspaper people are protecting the company or some politician.... or just generally bad. Heh. But I’ve also seen Chronicle people (and the radio guy) slamming commenters in editorials using generalizations out of what I suspect is a reluctance to share their ink and paper with the world. One thing we all know is the hits add to the revenue of the paper.

Even with all this study about how a newspaper should handle the internet world, no one knows how the institution diving into yups, LOLs and hehs will evolve and what is “right.”

Certainly, I can find examples of every psychological diagnosis in the DSM in the comments. Eventually you get to know the personalities or rather symptoms of the commenters and that makes some even more interesting in a “bless his heart” way.

Have we gone beyond classic journalism and embarked on a science fiction like trip where news’ stories play out in the comments sections before us with emotions and all types of personalities affecting the original story like a time machine changing history? Geez, that sounds bizarre, I realize. Maybe the paper will become a news video game with readers zapping politicians in 3D simulations and augmented reality? Even more bizarre, but it would be worth 50 cents.