Advisory board mulls stance against SRS spent fuel storage

Monday, May 20, 2013 5:37 PM
Last updated 8:13 PM
  • Follow Metro

Savannah River Site’s Citi­zens Advisory Board is considering a draft recommendation opposing any future use of the site for storing spent nuclear fuel.

“The CAB would like to go on record saying that it is opposed to the use of SRS or any portion of the site for the storage of commercial nuclear wastes,” said the draft, shared Monday by the board’s waste management committee.

The draft is only at the discussion stage. A full vote on the position would be scheduled this summer.

Though there is no formal plan to bring spent commercial reactor fuel to the site, the demise of the government’s Yucca Mountain project in Nevada left the nation without options for the 75,000 tons of radioactive spent fuel accumulating at commercial nuclear plants.

A blue-ribbon committee formed to explore alternatives suggested “consolidated, interim storage” of the dangerous material until a better solution can be found.

The committee did not make site recommendations, but officials say it would be difficult to explore those options without considering SRS, which has nuclear waste experience and infrastructure, and a location in the South, which has many commercial nuclear plants.

In March, consultants hired by the SRS Community Reuse Organization – an economic development consortium – unveiled a $200,000 study that concluded the site’s H Canyon processing facilities and long history of nuclear involvement make it a suitable site for such storage.

“Consolidated storage would start with the spent nuclear fuel currently in South Caro­lina and Georgia and, if successful, could expand to include the remainder of the 20,000 metric tons of spent fuel in the southeastern U.S.,” the report said Sub­sequent phases could accommodate more spent fuel from Virginia and the Northeast.

Though the project would bring money and jobs to the area, it would require broad community support to be successful, the study said, noting that storage could also lead to a reprocessing complex at SRS.

The draft recommendation notes that the advisory board is not opposed to commercial nuclear power generation, but fears that a new effort to create a permanent repository “is generations away” and could leave material stranded indefinitely in South Carolina.

Representatives from Friends of the Earth, the South Carolina Chapter of the Sierra Club and other groups have said they will oppose any plan to import spent fuel into the state.

“It is clear that there is a growing momentum in South Caro­lina against giving consent to a consolidated storage facility for highly radioactive spent fuel at SRS or any other site,” said Tom Cle­ments, the Southeastern nuclear cam­paign coordinator with Friends of the Earth.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
GiantsAllDay 05/21/13 - 01:32 am
The article did not mention

The article did not mention something I feel is pertinent. Just how much horsepower does the CAB have?

SCEagle Eye
SCEagle Eye 05/21/13 - 05:25 am
SC won't consent

Why in the world should South Carolina consent to becoming a spent fuel dump? Special interests stand to profit while we get dumped on with another big nuclear mess. Ain't gonna happen.

Reindeargirl 05/22/13 - 09:42 am
It seemed to the audience

It seemed to the audience attending that the CAB was being deliberately led away from voting on this resolution by a small number of members who represent the nuclear industry. The whole process of the CAB was questioned and seem to have been compromised and undermined by those with vested interests in seeing this resolution not pass. There seems to be a conflict of interest in some members of this body that should be looked at seriously.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs