Augusta Economy

More News | Fort Gordon | Plant Vogtle | Savannah River Site | Editor

DHEC wants SRS to meet waste cleanup deadline

Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2013 11:31 AM
Last updated 10:04 PM
  • Follow Business

More delays in completing a complex to process Cold War waste from Savannah River Site’s underground storage tanks could violate commitments made to South Carolina and trigger huge fines.

The $1.4 billion Salt Waste Processing Facility, which will use new technology to accelerate cleanup operations, was supposed to be working in 2009, then 2011, and then delayed again until 2015 – a date the U.S. Department of Energy now acknowledges “is no longer achievable.”

The newest delay, which could push completion to 2018, will compromise a federal facilities agreement that calls for the project to be operational by the end of October 2015, said Van Keisler, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act program manager for the state Department of Health & Environmental Control.

“We have not received any formal request to change that date as of yet, so in our minds that is still the date for the facility to be operational,” he told the SRS Citizens Advisory Board this week in Augusta.

Breaking the agreement, he said, could be costly, with penalties of $105,000 per day after October 2015.

“If a formal request comes in to change that date, we will evaluate that,” he said. “However, we do expect DOE to take every step possible to continue to meet that date or come as close to that date as possible.”

Tony Polk, the salt waste facility’s federal project director, said the plant is making progress and is now 62 percent complete.

The missed deadlines, he said, can be blamed on a two-year delay in the delivery of specially made steel tanks and recurring issues with the quality of material procured for the project.

“Finding welders who can produce in a nuclear-quality environment is a challenge,” he said, and many employees have been lured away to other sites because of increased competition for nuclear construction and nuclear waste workers.

“Generally, every time there is an outage in another part of the nuclear complex, they compete with us,” he said.

Citizens Advisory Board Chairman Don Bridges acknowledged the two-year delay in tank delivery but said there is a nine-year difference from the original completion date of 2009 and the newest estimate for 2018.

“You talked about a two-year delay in reference to receiving the vessels,” he said. “So where’s the other seven years?”

Polk said other issues included a string of changes in the project that shifted the facility to a higher “performance category” that triggered additional regulations and work.

Bridges also asked about the certainty of the 2018 completion date.

“There’s always the possibility of additional delays because there are always the risks of funding and other factors,” Polk said, adding, that the further the project progresses, the less the risk of major delays.

The project cost, he said, is under review and likely to increase by a still-unknown amount.

“Because of delays and additional work, the government has completed studies for a baseline change in cost,” Polk said.

The government’s findings will be compared with opinions from the project contractor – Parsons – to devise a new cost estimate later this year.

The Salt Waste Processing Facility will replace interim components of its existing Saltstone Facility, which opened in 1990 and was modified last year to improve its efficiency and to prepare it for new roles after the modern plant is completed.

Comments (1) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
SCEagle Eye
917
Points
SCEagle Eye 01/30/13 - 06:20 pm
2
0
costly mistakes and delays

This delay is going to cost perhaps $5 billion as it will impact processing of high-level waste and closure of the waste tanks. The money simpy isn't there to pay for this major mistake. Who will be hwld accountable? I know that's a word foreign to the DOE dictionary but one day it will be understood.

GiantsAllDay
9697
Points
GiantsAllDay 01/30/13 - 11:32 pm
2
0
DHEC has wanted a timely

DHEC has wanted a timely clean up from DOE for how many years now? DOE has made promises to SC (DHEC, a joke of an organization if you ask me). The state of south Carolina bought into it and sold its soul for jobs. Reap what you sow DHEC and SC and go ahead and whine about it to the media like a scared little girl. Final score: DOE a full set of 2 testicles, SC & DHEC none at all. Oh ya, one other thing: if you own a mom and pop burger stand in south Carolina, and your French fry grease isn't being disposed of properly?? DHEC will come down on you. But if your the FEDS break a promise to them? They will say that's ok please try to make good on it whenever you can. Did everyone read the title to this article? "DHEC wants SRS to meet waste deadline" LOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOL!!!!! ya DHEC and I want to win the big lotto jackpot pot this weekend. Which one of us stands the best chance??? Oh ya one other thing: DOE asked south Carolina: if we give you an ice cream cone little boy can we send you even more nasty waste? South Carolina said, SURE, MISTER!!

Back to Top

Top headlines

SRS shipments halted until 2016

Savannah River Site can't resume shipments of Cold War nuclear waste materials to an underground repository in New Mexico until at least 2016 when the federal government reopens the facility to ...
Search Augusta jobs