The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the bill 19-1 Tuesday. It would sync the candidate filing process for incumbents and those seeking public office, and provide a grace period for mistakes instead of removing people from the ballot if their paperwork isn’t together when they file for office.
The bill also would attempt to decrease the frequency of mistakes by creating a checklist that party workers must abide by.
Under the measure, the candidate filing period would be shortened from two weeks in March to one week. Republican and Democratic party officials would be required to open temporary offices in county election headquarters to accept candidate filings. Under current law, the party can decide where to accept filings.
The full Senate should take up the bill next week. Judiciary Committee Chairman Larry Martin expects plenty of support but isn’t ready to say the bill will move swiftly to the House.
“There’s a lot of pent-up demand to talk. Everyone has a story to tell,” said Martin, R-Pickens.
That’s because there were few races that didn’t end up affected by the “ballot I don’t know what to call it – crisis, time bomb, anomaly … we had last year,” said Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Isle of Palms.
Several new senators on the committee had to collect signatures and get on the ballot through petitions after being kicked off. In all, about 250 candidates found themselves off the ballot because they filed paperwork about their income and other economic information either electronically or on paper, but not both.
The bill would allow candidates to file that information electronically and bring some kind of proof, whether it is a printout of the form or a receipt sent along by e-mail, when they file to run and pay their fee. The proposal also would give a 10-day grace period to fix any mistakes that get by the person checking the forms and a $250 fine if a candidate messes up. “The only sentence should not be getting kicked off the ballot,” Campsen said.
Sen. Lee Bright, R-Roebuck, was the only vote against the bill. He said he supports it, but thought too many amendments were made during the meeting and the committee should look at the whole bill one more time. Martin said the amendments were technical and there will be plenty of time for review on the Senate floor.
The Judiciary Committee also approved a bill that supporters said will close a loophole that some business owners are using to bring a form of video gambling back to South Carolina. Challengers to the bill promised a fight on the Senate floor, and even some lawmakers who voted for the bill suggested the Senate needed a broader debate on gambling in the state.