Government

More News | | | Editor

Georgia money could help jumpstart harbor deepening

Fish bypass could get early start

Monday, Oct. 29, 2012 5:49 PM
Last updated Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2012 1:45 AM
  • Follow Metro

Some of the first components of the Savannah Harbor expansion, including a $32.2 million fish passage structure on the Savannah River near Augusta, might be financed by Georgia money to avoid the wait for congressional appropriations.

A fish bypass, shown in this overlaid aerial photo, will be built at New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam to help fish swim upstream.   SPECIAL
SPECIAL
A fish bypass, shown in this overlaid aerial photo, will be built at New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam to help fish swim upstream.

After 13 years of study, a formal “record of decision” was issued Friday by the Army’s assistant secretary for civil works that affirms federal approval for the $652 million dredging plan. Before it can start, however, several mitigation projects to lessen environmental damage – including fish passage at New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam – must be completed.

Billy Birdwell, a spokesman for the Army Corps of Engineers’ Savannah District, said discussions are under way to possibly begin some mitigation projects earlier with money already set aside by the state for its 30 percent cost share.

“Congress has to appropriate the money and they have some set aside, but not all of it,” Birdwell said. “We’re also working on an agreement with state of Georgia to maybe use their money early instead of piecemealing it throughout the construction phases.”

Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal is willing to use state money to expedite some of the projects.

“We want it started yesterday, so to speak, so the state will partner with the feds in whatever way gets the ball rolling,” said Brian Robinson, the governor’s spokesman.

Georgia’s share of the cost will be 30 to 40 percent.

“As far as the split, I’m told it’s a complicated formula, but we’d celebrate if it turned out to be 70/30,” Robinson said.

The fish structure will be built mostly on the South Carolina side of the river and is designed to allow upstream migration of both the shortnose and Atlantic sturgeon, along with other saltwater species – such as American shad and striped bass – that spawn in rivers.

It is one of several mitigation projects designed to offset the environmental impacts of dredging and deepening 38 miles of coastal channels – from the current 42-foot depth to 47 feet – to accommodate larger cargo ships.

Other projects include restoring marshes affected by disposal of dredge material; addition of about 2,200 acres to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; construction of a freshwater impoundment to be used for a backup water supply during droughts and tide-induced saltwater intrusion incidents; annual payments to Georgia to stock striped bass in the Savannah River; and a system to inject dissolved oxygen into the harbor area to improve water quality.

The mitigation efforts jointly account for 40 to 50 percent of the project’s total cost. Corps officials hope to begin working on some projects in 2013.

Comments (3)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Riverman1
70479
Points
Riverman1 10/30/12 - 06:51 am
2
1

Deepening Savannah, Charleston and Jacksonville

At a cost of $652 million to deepen Savannah Harbor, I'd like to see an economic study of not dredging it deeper. The enviromental facts associated with the river aside, Charleston and Jacksonville are not that far away and the impact of ships using harbors in cities with rail and interstate highways would not harm Georgia's economy in my opinion. If we are spending this much, it should have been studied. All we hear is how much the port of Savannah could lose and its impact on the state without factoring the ports of Jacksonville and Charleston into the equation and their impact on Georgia. Three superports that close is too much in addition to the effect on the Savannah River and Lake Thurmond if Savannah Harbor is deepened.

bubbasauce
17212
Points
bubbasauce 10/30/12 - 10:25 am
3
0

Are you serious? 32.2 million

Are you serious? 32.2 million spent for fish to migrate upstream? There is one example of why this country is so broke! Give me a break. There are much smaller versions of a fish migration device used elsewhere that would cost millions less.

Warnin
15
Points
Warnin 10/30/12 - 11:05 am
1
0

Fish?

Unpublished

Now who doesn't like fish? But, why do we have to spend 32.2 million so they can swim upstream? Has anyone certified that they swim that far inland, and if so, What would happen if they spawned at a more easterly point? Another question, what has dredging the harbor got to do with a lock near Augusta? The Savannah River ain't the Mississippi! How far inland is navigable for barges and other commercial traffic? Maybe, if the democrats loose the house, senate and white house this silliness will stop!

Fishboy
29
Points
Fishboy 10/30/12 - 01:45 pm
0
0

Economic study

Riverman, they did a TON of analyses on the expansion. Check out www.sav-harbor.com...

Back to Top

Loading...