As government budgets shrink, Riverkeepers become watchdogs and whistleblowers

Sunday, Oct. 28, 2012 5:56 PM
Last updated Monday, Oct. 29, 2012 12:58 AM
  • Follow Metro

Tonya Bonitatibus knew from the start that her job description was – at best – a moving target.

Back | Next
The Savannah River is one of the region's major waterways, but environmental groups fear government budget cuts and staff losses could reduce regulatory scrutiny.   SPECIAL
The Savannah River is one of the region's major waterways, but environmental groups fear government budget cuts and staff losses could reduce regulatory scrutiny.

“Our role is always changing,” said the 31-year-old director of Savannah Riverkeeper. “It’s something even the environmental movement is trying to wrap its head around.”

The nonprofit group, whose membership has grown from 30 to more than 700 since 2009, is widely known for its volunteer-driven litter cleanups, kayak events and outreach programs to educate the public about the river’s many critical roles.

Beneath the surface, though, Savannah Riverkeeper and its six sister groups across Georgia are also stirring up their share of mud – as watchdogs and whistleblowers who are using the courts to challenge what they see as lax enforcement of environmental laws.

One catalyst for an upsurge in activism is the reduction of staff and funding for Georgia’s Environmental Protection Division, the state agency responsible for enforcing a host of compliance programs.

EPD director Judson Turner, who declined a request to be interviewed for this article, outlined the extent and impact of those cuts during a speech to Augusta and Columbia County chambers of commerce earlier this month.

The agency, he said, is operating with just 850 workers – down from 1,100 in 2008 – but the duties remain the same or in some cases have increased, and more cuts are on the way.

As oversight from regulators diminishes, the potential for problems increases.

“You could call it deregulation through defunding,” Bonitatibus said. “Most people don’t realize they are not being protected like they were in the past, and that in some cases, no one is doing any testing except the industries themselves.”

Locally, Savannah Riverkeeper is involved in several cases, including litigation against the proposed deepening of Savannah harbor and a local case in which Riverkeeper and Jones Creek Investors contend that various developers, landowners and Columbia County caused erosion and sedimentation damage to a golf course and nearby assets.

“We’re not fond of litigation, but whenever you’re taking on these kinds of things you usually do it as a group,” she said. “Some of these things have a lot of resources to come back after you — like David and Goliath. But if you have six Davids, you come out a little stronger.”

Savannah Riverkeeper, formed in 2001, is part of a network of almost 200 affiliated groups tied – at least by membership – to the Waterkeeper Alliance, founded in 1999 by environmental activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“We don’t get money from them, and in fact pay them a licensing fee,” she said. “We operate pretty much on our own, but we do have some general standards to meet.”

With today’s shrinking government budgets and an economy that could push polluters to explore every loophole, Riverkeeper groups will have more to watch for, said Neill Herring, a veteran environmental lobbyist in Atlanta.

Riverkeepers never wanted the role of whistleblower, but have been forced into such duties by necessity.

“Riverkeepers don’t regard it as their duty to be regulators,” Herring said. “That’s the function of the state. You have a public resource, and the state is the steward of that resource – and it’s the state‘s job to protect it.”

Challenges to incomplete enforcement of environmental laws, he predicted, will continue to increase as the government’s oversight diminishes. “I don’t see how that would be avoidable, because these agencies are so non-responsive.”

Flint Riverkeeper Gordon Rogers said Georgia’s regulators were once effective at cleaning up industrial and municipal wastewater.

“That was in the ’70s and early ’80s,” he said. “Systematically, since about 1984, the Legislature and several administrations have by design dismantled EPD. It’s all done through the budget process and by meddling in permitting and enforcement activities.”

The agency, he said, has been politicized and de-fanged, yet still has many hard working and qualified scientists who try to do their jobs with reduced resources.

“We’re at odds with them all the time, but it’s like tough love,” Rogers said. “Our ultimate goal is to rebuild the agency so it can do its job.”

EPD, however, is not likely to regain its previous staffing and funding levels, its director Turner said during his speech in Augusta. Instead, the agency’s leaders are exploring ways to adapt.

One new strategy, Turner said, could include a streamlined approach to industrial permitting that would affect thousands of factories, sewage dischargers, drinking-water plants and mines.

Currently, state workers administer those permits, he said.

“We’re looking at something where we could perhaps allow permittees to pay for part of that, through a third-party contract,” he said, noting that having fewer resources does not change EPD’s regulatory obligations.

“As we are asked to do more with less, we would move more from doing the work to an oversight kind of position,” he said.

One of the most widely known cases of Riverkeeper groups challenging state regulators involves the case of King America Finishing, a Screven County textile plant linked to a major 2011 fish kill on the Ogeechee River. The resulting investigation found that the plant was releasing unpermitted wastewater into the river.

Riverkeeper groups have continued to oppose the state’s proposed penalties against the company, contending they are far too lax. The matter remains in court, while EPD mulls a proposed new permit that would allow King America to remain in operation, with stricter monitoring rules, and finance $1 million in environmentally beneficial projects.

“We use every ethical and legal tool in the book: education and outreach, cleanups, paddles on the rivers, even talking to Kiwanis and Rotary groups,” Rogers said. “All of that is important, but so is working in the Legislature – and in the courtroom.”

Fighting those battles is slow and expensive – on both sides.

According to Herring, Georgia’s EPD headquarters recently added a new staff attorney – which he sees as a sign that the regulators anticipate more challenges.

The Riverkeeper groups, meanwhile, need funds to keep their cases in court. This Thursday, they are bringing environmental advocate Erin Brockovich to Atlanta for a $100-per-person fundraiser.

The proceeds, according to their flier, will be used to help pay for the law firm GreenLaw’s efforts on behalf of Ogeechee Riverkeeper’s case over the King America permit.

Savannah Riverkeeper's three main goals

1: Restore water quality in the Savannah River, its lakes and tributaries, to fully support the uses of fishing, swimming, drinking, recreation and habitat protection.

2: Protect the Savannah River, its lakes and tributaries, through the establishment of buffers and the use of best management practices for activities that affect water quality.

3: Educate the people of the Savannah River Basin by creating a culture of water quality protection, inspiring pride in water resources and developing ways to protect those resources.

Learn more about the Waterkeeper Alliance at:

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Dixieman 10/29/12 - 10:07 am
I wish I were Riverkeepers

Because every time their leader blows her nose she sends out a press release and the AC runs it - with photos - on the front page! At least this article FINALLY takes a closer look at the job-killing litigation this leftist outfit funds with your dues instead of just running photos of smiling volunteers in boots cleaning out the river on a sunny Saturday. I want full disclosure of how much of their annual budget is spent on job-killing litigation and regulation.

Rob Pavey 10/29/12 - 10:31 am
Here ya go, d-man,

See link below for waterkeeper parent group's 2011 tax return. It shows the national alliance spent $321,289 in "litigation/regulation" in FY 2011, which was a huge increase over $62,512 spent in 2010. And while the national group is not funding local litigation, the local group's dues help fund the national parent group's overall budget.

ratepayer 10/29/12 - 10:46 am
Thank God for the Riverkeepers

I think this article hit the nail on the head - its deregulation by defunding. We should be sending our thanks and our donations to Savannah Riverkeeper for the great work they do.. If the GA/SC environmental agencies were doing their job of protecting the people and the river, this litigation wouldn't be on the backs of the nonprofits aka the public .

Hey D-man, last time I checked de-funding means a loss of jobs, you know...arithmetic

Dixieman 10/29/12 - 04:33 pm
I am talking about

PRIVATE SECTOR jobs, i.e. real jobs, not government bureaucrats.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs
Top headlines
Class action lawsuit to proceed against Sentinel Offender Services
Friday's ruling by Judge Daniel J. Craig means that anyone sentenced for a misdemeanor offense in Columbia County Superior Court may be a party to the lawsuit that seeks to recover from Sentinel ...