Government

More News | | | Editor

Corps updates options for New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam

  • Follow Metro

A new option being explored for New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam involves filling in and closing the lock, rather than restoring it, and keeping the structure only as a dam.

Back | Next
An option being explored for New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam involves filling in and closing the lock and keeping only as a dam. The structure was built in 1937.  FILE/STAFF
FILE/STAFF
An option being explored for New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam involves filling in and closing the lock and keeping only as a dam. The structure was built in 1937.

According to a summary provided by the Army Corps of Engineers’ Savannah District Civil Works Team, the option was identified “as a potential way to reduce the cost of rehabilitating the structure to keep the pool that extends upstream to the City.”

The corps, which built the structure in 1937, concluded in 1999 that the dam no longer served commercial shipping – the sole purpose for which it was built. The corps’ plan to demolish it was opposed by local stakeholders, who rely on its water.

Local industries and governments formed a consortium to adopt the property, and Congress passed a law authorizing its restoration before its transfer to local jurisdictions.

The renovation was never funded, however.

The most recent developments unfolded last month, when the stakeholder consortium agreed to finance a $300,000 federal disposition study to update repair options.

“That study will include an estimate of the cost to fill the lock and repair/rehabilitate just the dam (and its five gates), as well as an estimate for repair/rehabilitation of both the lock and the dam,” the corps team
summary said.

In yet another development, environmental funding linked to the planned expansion of Savannah Harbor will be appropriated to build a fish passage structure at New Savannah Bluff. That plan, however, does not include funding for the renovation of the dam itself, or the increasingly unreliable lock.

North Augusta Mayor Lark Jones said it would make the most sense to combine the projects.

“That sounds like a more economical way that would make more sense,” he said.

Filling the lock and repairing only the dam, he said, is a decision that all the stakeholders would have to consider.

In addition to being used for industrial processes and drinking water, the pool of water backed up by the dam helps preserve the aesthetics of Augusta and North Augusta, Jones said.

“The goal is to save the water level in that part of the river, for all the reasons we discussed,” he said.

Augusta City Admin­istrator Fred Russell said the concept of filling the lock is not a popular one.

“Being landlocked after 200 years isn’t the position we want to be in, from our perspective,” he said. “But our major concern is keeping the pool, and our secondary concern is keeping the locks.”

The corps study is expected to take about 20 months.

Currently, the locks are opened about 50 times a year, by appointment, said Augusta Port Authority Chairman Wayne Hawkins.

In addition to Augusta and North Augusta, the stakeholders’ consortium includes Aiken County, DSM, Kimberly-Clark, General Chemical, Po­tash Corp. and South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
rmwardsr
525
Points
rmwardsr 09/07/12 - 05:18 pm
2
0
They should just make a dam

They should just make a dam decision and stick with it.

soapy_725
43676
Points
soapy_725 09/07/12 - 05:50 pm
1
0
Back fill the upstream side with rip-rap
Unpublished

The most efficient and economical solution. Weld the gates at a level that will protect the Augusta Riverfront. Let the water over top the structure. Again, in River City, a few people always want something for their own pleasure, but want all of the taxpayers to fit the bill.

We spent a lot of special days and evenings at the Lock and Dam. Before Clarke's Hill became the place. Church parties, scouts, playing ball and family reunions. Its day has passed. We live in a new culture.

dichotomy
32672
Points
dichotomy 09/07/12 - 08:47 pm
1
0
Seems a shame to be land

Seems a shame to be land locked when the dam and the gates have to be rehabed anyway and the lock can be reworked too. It's not like this has to be done but every 50 years or so if done correctly. If they are going to spend the money to fix the dam and the gates seems like it is pennywise and pound foolish not to repair the lock and have it available if ever needed. Who knows what opportunity might come along in the future with them enlarging the port down river. JMHO

soapy_725
43676
Points
soapy_725 09/07/12 - 05:54 pm
1
0
Of course Fred wants to spend taxpayer money on
Unpublished

any and all projects. Real or floating. This dam needs to become a permanent granite rock structure. Fred must be a multimillionaire by now.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs