Standardized security forces urged

Report finds policies of private security forces guarding nuclear waste, including at SRS, vary widely

  • Follow Metro

The U.S. Energy Department faces pressing personnel issues within private security forces that guard nuclear weapons material at six locations, including Savannah River Site, according to a new Government Accountability Office report.

The problems involve policies, salaries and equipment -- including weapons -- that can vary widely from site to site, in addition to concerns that increasingly rigorous training requirements could make it harder for employees of private companies to work until retirement age.

One option involves "federalization," or replacing the private firms with U.S. military. It was most recently explored in a 2009 study but subsequently rejected.

"Although DOE rejected federalization as an option in 2009 because it believed that the transition would be costly and would yield little, if any, increase in security effectiveness, the department recognized that the current contracting approach could be improved by greater standardization and by addressing personnel system issues," the GAO concluded.

The private work force includes 2,339 unionized officers and 376 supervisors who "are not uniformly managed, organized, staffed, trained, equipped, or compensated across the six DOE sites," the report said.

The SRS contractor, Florida-based Wackenhut Services Inc., has a local work force of 823 and is in the process of downsizing to 756.

Other sites that handle "special nuclear material" are Los Alamos National Laboratory, N.M.; the Y-12 National Security Complex, in Oak Ridge, Tenn.; the Pantex Plant, near Amarillo, Texas; the Nevada Test Site; and Idaho National Laboratory, near Idaho Falls. Differences among the sites often result from separate contracts and collective-bargaining agreements between contractors and unions, the report said.

"As a result, the management and compensation -- in terms of pay and benefits -- of protective forces vary."


Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Petey Aitchess
Petey Aitchess 02/10/10 - 04:43 am
Thank you, AC, today's

Thank you, AC, today's headline on this story is much more accurate than the one used yesterday to generate clicks and page views.

SCEagle Eye
SCEagle Eye 02/10/10 - 03:09 pm
The last thing we want at SRS

The last thing we want at SRS is the US military. It should be kept a civilian operation.

TheSPOKnows 02/10/10 - 07:52 pm
Whoever wrote this article,

Whoever wrote this article, DID NOT read the GAO report. None of the studies cited here, nor the current published GAO report had anything to do with replacing Contractor Protective Forces with the Military, but rather making those employees Federal instead of Contractor employees. I cannot believe they would make such an misinformed statement as they do in this article.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs