Augusta Economy

More News | Fort Gordon | Plant Vogtle | Savannah River Site | Editor

Mercury storage at SRS opposed

  • Follow Metro

Savannah River Site handles enough dangerous material already and shouldn't become a permanent home for the nation's unwanted mercury, opponents of the project said Thursday.

During a meeting to explore SRS as a potential home for 7,500 to 10,000 tons of mercury over the next 40 years, environmentalists and economic developers both lined up squarely against the idea.

The SRS Community Reuse Organization "does not support" housing the repository at SRS, said executive director Rick McLeod, who told Energy Department planners such a facility would be incompatible with the site's existing missions.

Susan Corbett, who heads South Carolina's 5,500-member Sierra Club chapter, agreed, saying the current effort to clean up a half century of radioactive waste from nuclear weapons production should remain the focus.

"We need all hands on deck for that mission," she said. "We don't want to become a storage site for more deadly, toxic materials here."

SRS is one of seven sites that could be chosen by DOE as a mercury repository.

Thursday's meeting, which drew about 20 people to North Augusta's new municipal building, was part of a process to devise an Environmental Impact Statement on the plan.

Tom Clements, regional coordinator for Friends of the Earth, said it would be wrong for SRS to establish permanent homes for more unwanted materials. "The mission of the site is cleanup and I feel the folks in Georgia and South Carolina would like to see it stay that way."

The need for such a repository is outlined in a 2008 law -- the Mercury Export Ban -- that requires DOE to designate a facility for the "long-term management and storage of elemental mercury generated within the U.S."

Much of the mercury to be stored comes from chlorine factories, waste recycling, gold mining and other industrial processes.

In addition to SRS, the department is evaluating Grand Junction Disposal Site in Grand Junction, Colo.; Hanford Site in Richland, Wash.; Hawthorne Army Depot in Hawthorne, Nev.; Idaho National Laboratory in Idaho Falls, Idaho; Kansas City Plant in Kansas City, Mo; and Waste Control Specialists in Andrews, Texas.

David Levenstein, the Energy Department's EIS document manager, said a draft EIS with evaluations of all seven potential sites will be available for public comment later this year. A site decision will be made in fall 2010.

Reach Rob Pavey at 868-1222, ext. 119 or rob.pavey@augustachronicle.com.

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
SCEagle Eye
933
Points
SCEagle Eye 07/31/09 - 06:40 am
0
0
Sounds like those quoted

Sounds like those quoted above got it right - the public wants SRS cleaned up and doesn't want new missions that produce radioactive or toxic waste. In addition to concern about long-term mercury storage (with no plan to dispose of the material or remove it), we don't want the nation's high-level spent nuclear fuel coming in for reprocessing. If you think the site is a mess now, reprocessing would make a huge mountain of all sort of radioactive waste (which can't be reused and would never lease the state).

Riverman1
90678
Points
Riverman1 07/31/09 - 06:58 am
0
0
I've been predicting we would

I've been predicting we would become Yucca Mtn by default, but now we are going to have mercury sitting on top of the world's radiocative waste. Heck, we may have invented some kind of new super bomb. Imagine that pile going off.

Little Lamb
47986
Points
Little Lamb 07/31/09 - 08:36 am
0
0
Yes, that would be one nifty

Yes, that would be one nifty "dirty" bomb, wouldn't it, RM? You ought to come back over to the forum sometime and post some smilies.

Riverman1
90678
Points
Riverman1 07/31/09 - 09:52 am
0
0
Hey LL. Thanks. Yeah,

Hey LL. Thanks. Yeah, radiocative mercury. If we thought plain old radioactive things were hard to clean up, let's see um clean it up topped with a cherry made out of mercury.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Georgia Regents' hospital plan chosen

Georgia Regents Medical Center won a lengthy and hardfought battle over two other Augusta hospitals to build the first hospital in Columbia County, the Georgia Department of Community Health ...
Search Augusta jobs