Health Care More | | | Editor

Augusta health leaders see good things ahead with health reform upheld

Doctors support reforms

  • Follow Health

Across the Augusta area, health care leaders generally reacted positively to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to uphold most of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, saying that it has both short-term and long-term impacts.

A practicing internal medicine physician in Thomson, Dr. Jacqueline W. Fincher could hardly sleep Wednesday night but was pleasantly surprised when the law was upheld.

“It honestly didn’t go the way I thought it would,” she said between seeing patientsThursday. “It is surprising but honestly very exciting.”

Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics had taken the reforms into account in its approach of forming more partnerships with physicians and community hospitals in trying to strengthen primary care at those levels and concentrating on more complex care within the health system, said David Hefner, the executive vice president for clinical affairs at Georgia Health Sciences University.

University Hospital has planned for the reforms by cutting costs because, even with greater coverage, the hospital stands to lose millions in the future from deep cuts in Medicare payments, CEO Jim Davis said.

With the ruling, “the unknown is eliminated,” he said.

At Trinity Hospital of Augusta, new CEO Jason Studley sees more uncompensated care being covered in the future. Doctors Hospital CEO Doug Welch pledged to work “with all of our stakeholders – elected officials, community leaders, clinicians and employees, to ensure the provision of this care continues smoothly.”

The Supreme Court held that Congress did not have the ability to “compel” people to buy health insurance through the Commerce Clause, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.

“The Framers (of the Constitution) knew the difference between doing something and doing nothing,” he wrote. “They gave Congress the power to regulate commerce, not to compel it.”

Using the government’s secondary argument, however, the court found that Congress could, through its power to “lay and collect taxes,” impose a tax on those who did not have health insurance, upholding the individual mandate. That means for Augusta providers that more patients will likely have health insurance beginning in 2014.

“That’s going to be huge,” Fincher said. “Every single day of the week, I see patients that are uninsured. It is a financial burden on the patient, and it is financial burden on me as a physician.”

If the patient turns out to have something serious, such as cancer, that could cost at least $50,000 to treat, Fincher said. It is no wonder medical costs are the leading cause of bankruptcy, she said.

For MCG health system, which provides about $100 million a year in uncompensated care, it could mean more compensation but also more activity from those who suddenly have access to primary and preventive care that they didn’t before, Hefner said.

“I think we are going to discover the pent-up demand is huge,” he said. That likely means higher short-term costs but potentially lower long-term costs.

“(The decision is) good news for people who will be able to visit doctors, utilize hospital services and obtain preventive health care,” Studley said. “We look forward to providing essential health services for more members of our community as coverage expands.”

Fincher said she has already seen the benefit of certain provisions of the law that have been implemented, such as requiring Medicare to pay primary care physicians like her 10 percent more for office visits and for preventive care, which should reorder the incentives in the health care system toward lower cost and better health. It already helps seniors pay for generic medications. There are about 3 million young people over age 21 who have been able to stay on their parents’ insurance until they are 26, Hefner said.

There are also beneficial insurance reforms ahead, such as eliminating the ability of insurance companies to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions, Davis said. In an analysis done by Objective Health and presented Thursday to the hospital’s board, the Medicare cuts of $155 billion that the American Hospital Association agreed to as part of the reform wipe out any gain from more people being insured, Davis said. In University’s case, by 2019 more than $20 million more in care would be covered, but government payments would decline by more than $47 million, he said.

“From a hospital perspective, the bad part is those cuts that we’ve agreed to far exceed the reimbursement we’re going to get through expanded coverage,” Davis said. University has been planning to meet that by cutting expenses an average of 4 percent a year, he said.

The court also struck down the power of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to penalize states that do not participate in an expansion of Medicaid under the law. That would have covered 16 million people nationwide and 650,000 in Georgia, said Fincher, who is the managing partner of McDuffie Medical Associates in Thomson and governor of the Georgia chapter of the American College of Physicians. That puts the burden back on Congress to find a solution for those patients, she said.

“How are we going to provide insurance to the poorest and most vulnerable people?” she said.

Comments (9) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
twolane 06/28/12 - 12:22 pm
like she said uninsured

like she said uninsured patients were a big financial drain on really shes just happy shes gonna get paid

dwb619 06/28/12 - 07:55 pm

Surprised to see this from a doctor. I would like to see a large response from other doctors.

john 06/28/12 - 01:33 pm

todays ruling had nothing to do with access to healthcare. it was about the power of government to force you, an individual to buy something. I think we all agree that there are parts of healthcare that needed fixing, such as access for the poor, pre existing condetions, etc, but instead of fixing them, congress messed the whole thing up for everyone, lying in the process and expanding the power of the federal government. what a con job.

specialist 06/28/12 - 02:47 pm
Obamma care

Doc, if you believe that the cost of health care is going to go down with the passage of this bill and it being upheld by the supremes, I have a bridge I will sell you up in Brooklyn New York, needs a paint job and is ugly, but still minimally functional.

paulwheeler 06/28/12 - 03:10 pm

So how much is this doctor going to cut her fees to help lower medical costs under this latest political travesty known as Obamacare? For her to take less money is the only way to get costs down, Obamacare just shifts the costs to another place (taxpayer), it does nothing to lower them.

aubaug 06/28/12 - 04:10 pm
This is an example of a young

This is an example of a young person who has grown up in a "socialist", "entitlement" environment. This poor doctor knows no other way of life. She has not been exposed to a free entrepreneurial way of life. I visited Poland not too long after the "Fall of the Berlin Wall" and was so shocked at the lack of competitiveness of shop owners as I was shopping. The clerks weren't eager to show me merchandise and could have cared less if I bought anything or not. This young doctor does not really care about "making it" or being FINANCIALLY successful. In fact, she might even feel a little guilty if she makes an above average salary. She has been made to feel guilty by our current American culture---rather socialist thinking, isn't it? She has been taught that her success should be based on her effectiveness as a physician, not on her financial gain (Nothing wrong with a healthy balance, here). Humans that self-sacrifice don't last long, emotionally or physically. A healthy financial system requires competition. As Dr. Fincher grows and matures (when her office equipment bills come in, employee insurance bills are due, malpractice insurance is due, Social Security Insurance on her employees must be paid, OSHA fines paid, Federal and State Income taxes are due, medical school tuition loans are due, her patients turn on her and sue her, etc.), perhaps she will come to her senses. Get a dog, a cat; my dear!

allhans 06/28/12 - 04:35 pm
Ridiculous...The doctors get


I suppose those with private insurance will make up the difference, so the physician can rest happy...

raul 06/28/12 - 05:40 pm
@aubaug. This "young" doctor

@aubaug. This "young" doctor is in her early 50s and old enough to know better. Heh. I must say she is a young looking 50!

corgimom 06/28/12 - 08:36 pm
No doctor or hospital is

No doctor or hospital is worried, sick people never disappear. And they know that. They always have plenty of business.

SheilaJ15 06/28/12 - 10:12 pm
Throwing the Elderly Under the Bus!

I have not heard one word from anyone how Obama Care will cut 500 Billion dollars out of Medicare. People one Medicare usually are living on a limited income by then and making Medicare patients pay more money for doctor's visits will just discourage them from getting care they need because they can't afford to go to the doctor. Our elderly are the ones who are the sickest population in our nation because aging brings about a lot of medical problems, so you are going to deprive the people who need it the most to make sure that young people who don't need it as much or as often have insurance? We may not have the "death panel" as per say, but it will be the same thing if our elderly can not afford to seek the medical care that they need. And Medicare is taken out of Social Security checks, so the elderly will have even less money to live on!

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs