Health Care

More | | | Editor

Member of panel defends findings

  • Follow Health

An admittedly controversial government recommendation on mammograms should not preclude women younger than 50 from getting them but should lead to a discussion with providers on whether the exam is worthwhile, said an Augusta member of that panel.

Lucy Marion, dean of Medical College of Georgia School of Nursing, said the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force knew the decision would spark debate, as do most recommendations about screenings, but that was what the science said.

"We knew it was controversial," she said. "It has been controversial for some years."

Groups such as the American Cancer Society had pushed for women to start screening mammograms at age 40 but the government panel recommended against routine annual screening of normal risk women ages 40 to 49. A paper supporting the decision of six different models of mammogram screening at different ages found that starting at age 40 decreased mortality by 3 percent, about 1 less death per 1,000 women, but substantially increased the rate of false positive tests, some of which resulted in biopsies. The panel recommended screening every two years starting at age 50.

"We did not say discontinue all screenings from 40 to 49. We said we no longer recommend routine screening of all women starting at age 40," Dr. Marion said. "But we recommend that women start that conversation with their provider and look at the positives and negatives."

Weighing the benefits of any screening is often controversial and difficult for even well-trained clinicians to evaluate, she said. The panel commissioned two different studies to help it reach a decision and spent about two years weighing the issue, Dr. Marion said. The panel did not take into account whether its recommendations might alter whether some insurance companies cover screenings, she said.

"We have been asked to be an independent body and make recommendations based on the science," Dr. Marion said.

The recommendations and resulting debate are already causing some women to question whether they should get mammograms, said Pamela Anderson of University Hospital's Breast Health Center.

"I think there are those people who will take this and use it to not get it just because they will think it is OK," she said. "I think mammograms save lives, whether it is one life or 20 lives."

Mrs. Anderson would be a good example of someone who might be missed -- she was 45 years old when she was diagnosed with breast cancer and had none of the factors that would have put her at high risk. The panel's recommendations have enraged many breast cancer survivors and clinicians and will likely drive them to crusade against changing the standards.

"Then there are those women who will probably use it as an excuse not to, because we already know women don't really like to get them," Mrs. Anderson said. "It scares me. Our mammography rates aren't that good anyway. We're just going to have to work harder to make sure that we educate women on what we believe is the right thing for them to do."

Reach Tom Corwin at (706) 823-3213 or tom.corwin@augustachronicle.com.

ADVICE UNCHANGED

WASHINGTON --- Women should continue getting regular mammograms starting at age 40, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said Wednesday, moving to douse confusion caused by a task-force recommendation two days earlier.

-- Associated Press

Comments (7) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
dickworth1
954
Points
dickworth1 11/19/09 - 05:09 am
0
0
Here comes the government
Unpublished

Here comes the government telling you they will not pay for
mammograms under certain ages, welcome to your national
health plan by the obama administration. This is just a start
of what the plan will dictate and will cut out other test I promise
you. You wanted change and believe me you're going to get it.
Most supporters are looking at free coverage, which will change after it is passed and losing big money. The cost will be spread to all that pay income tax just like medicare payments that
currently come out of your paycheck. Medicare is a government
health care for seniors that does not cover a lot and people
have to have supplement insurance which seniors pay big dollars
to have the coverage to cover what medicare does not pay.

catfish201
0
Points
catfish201 11/19/09 - 06:48 am
0
0
Mammogram rationing

Mammogram rationing today...What will the government choose to ration tomorrow?

mercyme
0
Points
mercyme 11/19/09 - 07:30 am
0
0
Dickworth1 You are absolutely

Dickworth1 You are absolutely right and catfish20 you are right too .

johnston.cliff
2
Points
johnston.cliff 11/19/09 - 08:24 am
0
0
The government has spent

The government has spent hundreds of millions of dollars establishing this mindset in all American women to decrease the mortality rate by 3%. That stat was never mentioned until a new message needed to establish a new mindset. Didn't the old war movies call this brainwashing?

seenitB4
80934
Points
seenitB4 11/19/09 - 08:32 am
0
0
The media has been

The media has been brainwashing us for years...It could be that too many xrays causes more trouble & they just don't want to say that..I don't like a lot of xrays anyway even at the dentist office..Do you remember xray machines at the shoe stores years ago??They took them out because they found it was too dangerous for people.. Yes I know they also save lives..

soldout
1280
Points
soldout 11/19/09 - 10:00 am
0
0
Many consider thermography a

Many consider thermography a better choice for screening. No radiation; just a picture of the heat generated from possible tumor sites.

mable8
2
Points
mable8 11/19/09 - 10:13 am
0
0
Ms Anderson: "Our mammography

Ms Anderson: "Our mammography rates aren't that good anyway." You are so right about this statement because mammography is one of the more costly AND inaccurate cancer detection tests around. Until you find a better way to perform cancer detecting tests that are accurate, I suggest the mammography to be discontinued permanently. Try telling deceased cancer victims who relied on their mammography that "this is the right thing to do."

jack
10
Points
jack 11/19/09 - 06:01 pm
0
0
The beginning of government

The beginning of government health care rationing for the older folks. Wait 'til they cut Medicare by $500B and see what the gov't will and will not pay for then. This is everyone's opportunity to KILL gov't run helath care while in the Senate. Call, write or email your Senator to kill it. DiMint will vote NO but don't know where Grahamnesty stands.

Back to Top

Loading...