GOP education bills fell victim to Senate struggle

ATLANTA --- The list of education bills came straight from the GOP playbook: vouchers, charter schools, teacher performance, parental empowerment. But each one failed this year, even with a near super-majority for Republicans under the Gold Dome.

Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers (second from right), R-Woodstock, either introduced or backed three education bills, all of which failed to pass in the state Legislature this year.   File/Associated Press
File/Associated Press
Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers (second from right), R-Woodstock, either introduced or backed three education bills, all of which failed to pass in the state Legislature this year.

Political observers say the bills were victims of an ongoing power struggle in the state Senate leadership and a state Legislature shy about passing any measures that could be perceived as costing cash-strapped school districts more money. And they were overshadowed by a scramble of state lawmakers looking to cut back spending by the lottery-funded HOPE scholarship program and prekindergarten programs.

"The arrangement in the Senate was not conducive to passing legislation -- the uncertainty of who was in power, the uncertainty from the House on who to deal with," said Charles Bullock, a political scientist at the University of Georgia. "With the leaders of the Senate spending time trying to bolster their positions, they're going to have less time to devote to legislation."

Georgia's legislative session lasts two years, which means any bills that didn't pass this year can be revived when lawmakers return in January.

One bill would have expanded the state's limited school voucher program to include active military families and students in foster care. The program already allows special-needs students to use taxpayer dollars to attend private schools.

Critics argue such a measure only takes money away from public schools, but Senate Majority Leader Chip Rogers, the sponsor, said public schools already lose per-student funding when their enrollment drops. He said the voucher program simply empowers parents to make choices for their children.

The state's ongoing budget woes made many lawmakers hesitant to pass legislation that could take more money away from districts, said House Education Committee Chairman Brooks Coleman. The school voucher bill, which also didn't pass last year, hasn't gained the traction it needs among many voters, Coleman said.

"With the budget like it is, people felt it was not time to look at that because so much needed to be done with education," Coleman said.

Another bill would have given parents the power to vote to close a low-performing school, parroting a controversial California law known as the "parent trigger act." The bill got little traction and never made it out of the Senate Education Committee despite having Rogers' backing.

Another measure would have allowed children in charter schools to take part in extracurricular activities at traditional public schools. Lawmakers attached a high school sophomore's name to the bill and brought her to the Capitol to testify in favor of it.

But school districts and educators said the bill would put an unfair burden on schools' athletic teams and clubs for students who chose to go to a charter school rather than enroll in a school with extracurricular activities.

All three bills were either introduced by Rogers or had his and other Republican leaders' backing.

Lawmakers instead spent much of their energy battling over who is in charge of the Senate rather than trying to win votes for legislation. Rogers and other Senate leaders staged a coup and stripped power from Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle last fall, leaving the Senate with a vacuum of leadership as the men squabbled.

"From what I could see operationally on the floor, there was a ball of confusion," said Senate Minority Leader Robert Brown of Macon.

Rogers could not be reached for comment.

At the same time, House leaders were working to push through Gov. Nathan Deal's plan to cut the HOPE program. The plan gained overwhelming approval in the House -- even from some Democrats -- but passed strictly along party lines in the Senate.

"You've got only so much time you can devote to any large policy area," said Bullock. "A lot effort for education got sucked into dealing with HOPE. It was something of a vortex."

Comments (1)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
scgator
1042
Points
scgator 04/25/11 - 06:29 pm
0
0

I can understand budget cuts

I can understand budget cuts and inflation issues; but, what I don't understand is why the system is so "top heavy" with assistants, counselors, and aides, etc. There aren't any more kids in school now than when I graduated in 1970. So why do we have to have increases in staff of sometimes double and triple to accomplish the same goals. We have more "education tools and resources" with lower return on the investment than ever before in the history of education. I say make the school system accountable and "man up" and do what they have chosen to do as a profession.

Back to Top

Loading...