Officials cautious on speed cameras

COLUMBIA --- House lawmakers are likely to take a particularly nuanced approach to the issue of traffic speed cameras.

On Thursday, the South Carolina Senate voted unanimously to ban the devices. The body must give a largely perfunctory third reading before the legislation can clear the chamber.

The bill, S. 336, introduced by Sen. Larry Grooms, a Republican representing Berkeley and Charleston counties, prohibits the town of Ridgeland from operating its manned system on its stretch of Interstate 95 in Jasper County. Senators also attached an amendment by Sen. Tom Davis to create a study commission on the camera system, which is not in use anywhere else in the state.

The debate began this session after lawmakers learned that Ridgeland continued to operate its system despite a new law aimed at halting it. A federal class-action suit has been filed on behalf of those ticketed.

"I don't necessarily believe that it should be in the hands of municipalities," said Rep. Andy Patrick, R-Hilton Head Island, during a meeting with local businesspeople this week. He suggested the state Department of Public Safety or the Highway Patrol should be in charge, if the system is to be deployed at all.

Rep. Shannon Erickson, R-Beaufort, who sponsored legislation to allow the cameras, said the issue was addressed too quickly before and she hopes to encourage a more thorough look.

"I would not say that I'm in support of the cameras," Erickson said. "I'm in support of having the debate."

Bluffton Rep. Bill Herbkersman said the decline in fatalities in the wake of the camera system should factor into upcoming talks.

In the seven months before the camera system began in August, town data show the average monthly total crashes was 7.86 and the average monthly fatality rate was 0.71. In the first five months of operation, the average monthly total crashes was 5.8 and there were no fatalities.

But opponents of the town's system say it creates a speed trap and fails to stop the speeding activity, among other problems. Supporters say the system makes the stretch of I-95 safer and helps the town defray public safety expenses related to accidents.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
WW1949 03/04/11 - 09:16 am
That is their key

That is their key reason-helps defray expenses.

onlysane1left 03/04/11 - 10:04 am
Yes, watch out everyone, "Big

Yes, watch out everyone, "Big Brother" is broke and is trying even harder to get into your life and wallet, even if he does it from afar.

CoastalDawg 03/04/11 - 11:14 am
Persons who are "the accused"

Persons who are "the accused" are guaranteed the right of being able to face the accuser in court - so how can one face a camera and have that camera testify? Of course the real answer is to slow down, but are we at the point where we depend on technology to do our policing for us, totally removing the human aspect? We've accepted traffic light camera tickets as the norm in some places although the maintenance cost was higher than the revenue produced at one Savannah intersection and the cameras were removed some time ago. Ridgeland, South Carolina, continues to defy all concerns about the legality of the speed cameras and fill its coffers with those caught by technology. Who knows if the speeds noted by the cameras are actually the real speed? No, it's time to turn back to PEOPLE, give them JOBS as policemen, whatever position is needed to track us, know our every move, chastise us, and give us tickets when we err. At least if the policeman doesn't show up in court for a couple of times, we have the opportunity to get the charge dismissed.

Back to Top
Top headlines

Commissioners leaning toward not funding groups

Commissioners have stressed needs over wants in the new package after the first SPLOST 7 referendum failed last year, and despite impassioned presentations Tuesday, leaders did not change their minds.
Search Augusta jobs