Government

More News | | | Editor

Commission moves to rectify garbage pickup inequities

Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:29 PM
Last updated Wednesday, June 18, 2014 12:00 PM
  • Follow Government

Augusta Commission members took steps to level a longstanding inequity in the price of garbage pickup Tuesday, although the change will affect lower-income urban homeowners more than others.

Back | Next
Commissioners agreed Tuesday at Bill Lockett's urging to spread the commissioners and mayor evenly behind their new granite dais. The current arrangement has the 10 commissioners in clusters at either end with the mayor in the middle.  MICHAEL HOLAHAN/STAFF
MICHAEL HOLAHAN/STAFF
Commissioners agreed Tuesday at Bill Lockett's urging to spread the commissioners and mayor evenly behind their new granite dais. The current arrangement has the 10 commissioners in clusters at either end with the mayor in the middle.

They also sent Environmental Services Director Mark Johnson back to rewrite a controversial policy to charge for garbage service at vacant lots but took no action on his proposal to reinstitute curbside tire pickup.

The garbage fee inequity dates to consolidation, when only property owners inside the old city limits paid the city, via a portion of their property taxes, for curbside trash pickup. When curbside pickup was later mandated for suburban residents, homeowners there were charged a flat fee instead of a property tax assessment.

Until now, suburban residents have paid a $310.50 annual fee for the service, while owners in the old city limits paid a $115.50 fee plus a millage assessment – known as the “urban services district” millage – which varies based on property values.

The inconsistency within the consolidated government’s boundaries prompted suburban residents to cry foul over the higher fee, while wealthy urban residents complained about the size of their services assessment.

Commissioners had previously approved the “concept” of changing to an all-fee-based system countywide, but none appeared aware the increased urban fee of $310.50 would appear on estimated tax notices mailed to all property owners last month, without any commensurate adjustment in the urban services millage rate.

Finance Director Donna Williams presented her recommendation Tuesday for leveling out the charges using a 2.787-mill reduction in the urban services millage, which was 7.987 mills last year.

The notices are required to show last year’s millage, making it impossible to show any planned reduction, she said.

The reduction, which commissioners will have to approve when they set the millage rate later this summer, isn’t a reduction for everyone. According to Williams’ chart, owners of homes subject to a homestead exemption won’t see a net decrease in the amount they pay for garbage and recycling unless their homes are valued at more than $150,000, at the point where the 2.787 assessment is greater than the $195 difference in fee.

A homesteaded $35,000 house will actually see a $169.92 increase on the city portion of their annual tax bill, a $50,000 home will see a $153.20 increase and a $100,000 home will increase by $97.46, despite the millage reduction, according to Williams’ data.

Commissioners have worked on the issue for years, with Wayne Guilfoyle leading a subcommittee last year and Bill Lockett serving on another before that.

They voted 8-0 Tuesday to approve the change, with Commissioners Bill Fennoy and Donnie Smith absent.

“This is a great start, probably the fairest and equitable way for every taxpayer in Richmond County,” Guilfoyle said.

A vacant lot charge similarly drew widespread ire when it appeared without warning on the estimated tax notices.

Lucien Williams, one of three property owners to speak out about unfairness in the trash collection system Tuesday, said the new vacant lot garbage assessment will cost him an extra $4,600 each year for a service he doesn’t expect to receive.

“I have no debris” on the lots, Williams said. “All we do is cut the grass.”

Johnson said estimated tax notices that went out last month had inadvertently assessed every parcel of greenspace, industrial, commercial and otherwise open property as a vacant lot subject to the new $155.25 charge, which he believes will encourage property owners to clean their lots.

“We need to just drop this, opt out of this altogether,” Commissioner Marion Williams said.

Guilfoyle, admitting to owning a couple of lots himself, said “we’re trying to charge for a service that will never be rendered.”

Lockett chastised Johnson for not mentioning the impact of the new charge when he presented details from the lengthy contract last year.

“We don’t always read every sentence in the contract,” Lockett said. “In the future, make sure those things are highlighted.”

Johnson said he had presented information about charging owners for garbage pickup on vacant lots in 2010.

“At some point, we did talk about it,” he said, although the fee amounts were set in a separate agenda item last year.

Comments (9) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Little Lamb
43798
Points
Little Lamb 06/17/14 - 09:43 pm
1
0
At first blush - - -

- - - subtracting out the 2.787 mils from urban center property tax rates will be the correct way to compensate for the fee increase. Hopefully, finance director Donna Williams’ calculations are accurate.

Little Lamb
43798
Points
Little Lamb 06/17/14 - 09:46 pm
2
0
Donnie Smith

I am so thankful that my commissioner, Donnie Smith, was not at the meeting. He had previously stated that he wanted to increase the millage rate for suburban taxpayers to offset the fee increase for urban center taxpayers. That is the most absurd thing I've heard lately (except for Abie Ladson’s stormwater fee).

seenitB4
80832
Points
seenitB4 06/18/14 - 05:33 am
1
0
Empty Lots

A charge for an empty lot makes zero sense...Gwinnett had to change some charges.

Riverman1
78940
Points
Riverman1 06/18/14 - 06:53 am
4
0
"Commission Moves To Rectify"

You lost me at the headline, "Commission Moves to Rectify." They have never rectified anything. They scream at citizens who point out accounting problems and shift offices around depending on whether you are a Democrat or a Republican (thank you Commissioner Lockett).

dichotomy
30310
Points
dichotomy 06/18/14 - 07:33 am
3
0
"“We don’t always read every

"“We don’t always read every sentence in the contract,” Lockett said."

I KNEW Lockett had a lot in common with Nancy Pelosi. He's one of them "we have to pass it to see what's in it" Democrats.

Actually, and it PAINS me to defend Mark Johnson, but I do remember him talking about his proposed "vacant lot" fee back when the discussion of equalizing the garbage fee first came up. As usual, Lockett was probably TALKING instead of LISTENING.

Little Lamb
43798
Points
Little Lamb 06/18/14 - 07:48 am
2
0
Highlight

Chastising Solid Waste Director Mark Johnson, Commissioner Bill Lockett said:

“We don’t always read every sentence in the contract. In the future, make sure those things are highlighted.”

Total absurdity on Lockett’s part. Lockett admits he does not read everything in the contract. But Johnson cannot know what Lockett read and what Lockett did not read. To comply with Lockett’s direction, Johnson would have to highlight every sentence.

dsterling9
626
Points
dsterling9 06/18/14 - 08:17 am
2
0
ENOUGH

Stop playing around and fix this. There should be no relation to property tax assessment for a service to pick up trash for residential properties. Yes, business should be charged differently if using the city service. Never have understood why the 'old city' gets treated differently than the rest of the consolidated city. Are we one city? If not, consolidation should be revoked! As for vacant lots, if the city garbage service is used in any way, i.e., grass and other lawn trimmings, limbs, etc., the service should be charged. If not used then no charge.

We need to determine whether we are one CITY or not!

If commissioners do not have time to read items presented then the vote should be delayed until there is time to read and question the proposal. If commissioners are so busy with other things not allowing them to perform their duties they could QUIT!

gargoyle
13235
Points
gargoyle 06/18/14 - 10:19 pm
1
0
What a mess... Start with a

What a mess... Start with a mandated provider, enforce a fee that property owners must pay under penalty of law and expect everybody to be happy. Some call that Crony Capitalism others call it Government over reach , all I know The Mafia would be proud.

Brad Owens
4098
Points
Brad Owens 06/20/14 - 12:48 am
0
0
Music to my ears...

"2.787-mill reduction in the urban services millage.."

Back to Top

Top headlines

UGA lineman charged

ATHENS, Ga. -- Georgia defensive lineman Jonathan Taylor was arrested early Tuesday on a charge of felony aggravated assault/family violence.
Loading...