Government SPLOST 7 | | | Editor

Former Augusta firefighter loses drug test appeal

Wednesday, June 19, 2013 8:44 PM
Last updated Thursday, June 20, 2013 1:48 AM
  • Follow Government

A former Augusta firefighter who challenged his 2008 termination for a positive drug screen got a new personnel board hearing Wednesday, but the panel again upheld his termination.

Edward Neal, a 26-year firefighter, claimed he never used drugs and alleged his was a false positive in the case, which changed state law regarding government employees’ right to face their accusers at a personnel hearing.

With the opportunity to question the Medical Review Officer and “collector” who handled Neal’s sample Wednesday, attorney Jack Batson inquired why no one had instructed Neal about his opportunity to test the other part of his “split sample,” a procedure Augusta employs that reserves half the sample for a possible retest later.

Brian Skelley of BC Drug and Alcohol Testing, who took Neal’s sample, said he shipped all collections to an Atlanta lab.

“I didn’t know you could test later on,” Skelley said, while city Risk Manager Sandra Wright said Augusta had used the split-sample procedure as part of its zero-tolerance drug policy since consolidation.

Neal said he learned through a phone call from then-Deputy Fire Chief Carl Scott that he’d tested positive for marijuana and asked his doctor what to do. The physician had him produce another sample, which tested negative, but it had been 12 days since his first test.

“That’s a pretty good length of time,” Wright testified.

Neal said he probably had signed documents acknowledging the city’s drug test policies and procedures. He’d found another job a few months after his termination, but wished he could restore his reputation and collect the city retirement he would have been eligible for in two years, at age 55.

“People that know me personally know I don’t do drugs,” he said.

Representing the city, attorney Dan Hamilton pushed Neal to explain why he or his attorneys
hadn’t asked to have the second part of the split sample, stored in Atlanta for a year or more, also tested.

“You did not do anything to have the split sample tested, correct?” Hamilton asked.

“If I had had a split sample, I would have had it tested,” Neal said.

After the two-hour hearing, the personnel board upheld the decision to terminate Neal. All five members present – chairman Chip Barbee, Ronnie Masters, Bob Finnegan, J.R. Riles and Gwendolyn Robinson – voted in favor.

Riles said he disagreed with how the city informed Neal about the result, but “due to the fact that (Neal) had signed” the policies and procedures, he should have been aware of them.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Fiat_Lux 06/20/13 - 01:59 pm
Right, everybody always reads the 6-point print and remembers it

Sure we do.

Truth is that this is an impossibility and the lawyer scum that produce it know that quite well. It is a tool to manipulate and it give employers a way to do just about anything to an employee that decide is not an asset.

What if this guy has simply walked past a bathroom in a restaurant or bar that had pot smoke coming out of it? He could have tested positive simply by being on the premises without having any idea he was partaking, much less having consented to it.

Marinerman1 06/20/13 - 04:14 pm
26 Year Veteran Firefighter - ARC Screwed UP

ARC screwed up. Why would a 26 year veteran take the chance? When the test came back positive, ARC should have asked to have the second sample tested. When it was found that Skelley, a contractor for ARC, screwed up and sent BOTH samples, then a hair test should've been done. That measures for the past three months. Give Neal his pension for crying out loud !!

absolutelymadison 06/21/13 - 06:19 pm
How can he be Fired, when he didn't come to hearing for that..

Mr.Neal was ask to come to the hearing to conduct settlement, which turns out they had no intention of discussing the settlement. The settlement was ruled feasible for Mr. Neal in a hearing Feb,2012 by the Superior Court Judge; who advise the attorneys involved to settle the figures and compensate Mr. Neal. However Richmond County officials (Panel of Five) appear to have overruled the Judge; How is this possible?

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs
Top headlines
Augusta VA supervisor sentenced to prison
In what the judge called a "tragic case," a former Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center supervisor was sentenced Thursday to 27 months in federal prison for making false statements in medical files.