Obama pushes preschool programs in Georgia trip

EVAN VUCCI/ASSOCIATED PRESS
President Obama looks through a magnifying glass during a learning game at a pre-kindergarten classroom at College Heights Early Childhood Learning Center in Decatur, Ga.
Thursday, Feb. 14, 2013 1:19 PM
Last updated Friday, Feb. 15, 2013 1:51 AM
  • Follow Government

DECATUR, Ga. — President Obama on Thursday pitched a new plan to make preschool available to all 4-year-old children, declaring, “Education has to start at the earliest possible age.”

Back | Next
President Obama gets a hug from a child at College Heights Early Childhood Learning Center, in Decatur, Ga. He visited the school to highlight their pre-kindergarten program.   JOHNNY CRAWFORD/ASSOCIATED PRESS
JOHNNY CRAWFORD/ASSOCIATED PRESS
President Obama gets a hug from a child at College Heights Early Childhood Learning Center, in Decatur, Ga. He visited the school to highlight their pre-kindergarten program.

With teachers as a backdrop, Obama made his case for greater access to preschool, arguing that poor children in particular can benefit. “Study after study shows that the earlier a child starts learning, the better he or she does down the road,” he said. “But here’s the thing: We are not doing enough to give all of our kids that chance.”

It was Obama’s second day on the road, after Tuesday’s State of the Union address, to promote initiatives for his second term directly to the public.

His visit came on the same day Education Secretary Arne Duncan told senators on Capitol Hill that pending budget cuts could be devastating to current students and could hurt the nation’s economy for years to come, if students aren’t learning now.

“We’re trying to do a lot more in terms of early childhood education, not go in the opposite direction,” Duncan said. “Doing that to our most vulnerable children is education malpractice, economically foolish and morally indefensible.”

Obama’s team is warning Congress – and lawmakers’ constituents – what is expected to happen if leaders fail to avert $85 billion in automatic budget cuts set to begin March 1. With the cuts looming, the administration has increased its pressure on lawmakers, and Obama’s address Tuesday made clear he was not looking for compromise as he begins his second term.

Before his remarks in Decatur, Obama stopped by a classroom at the College Heights Early Childhood Learning Center, which serves kids from infancy through pre-kindergarten. He played games with about a dozen children, bending down to give hugs or offer a fist bump.

“If you’re looking for a good bang for your education buck, this is it right here,” Obama said afterward. He praised the teachers as highly qualified. “This is not babysitting. This is teaching.”

The White House fleshed out Obama’s plan Thursday, proposing a “continuum of high-quality early learning for a child, beginning at birth and continuing to age 5.” The government would fund public preschool for any 4-year-old whose family income is 200 percent or less of the federal poverty level – a more generous threshold than the current Head Start program, which generally serves kids from families below 130 percent of the poverty line. All 50 states and the federal government would chip in.

Obama also is proposing letting communities and child care providers compete for grants to serve children 3 and younger, starting from birth. And once a state has established its program for 4-year-olds, it can use funds from the program to offer full-day kindergarten, the plan says.

Still missing from Obama’s plan are any details about the cost, a key concern among Republicans. The White House says federal investment in Head Start, an $8 billion program that serves almost 1 million kids, will grow. But Obama’s aides have stressed that the new programs would not add to the nation’s nearly $16.5 trillion debt.

“The last budget had over $1.5 trillion of mandatory and revenue savings, things like reductions in entitlements, closing loopholes,” Jason Furman, a deputy director of the National Economic Council, told reporters Wednesday. He said the new initiatives would be smaller than that. Obama will outline details about the plan’s cost when he sends his 2014 budget proposal to Congress next month, Furman said.

Ahead of that, the White House and Congress are weighing whether to let the deep automatic spending cuts to take hold on March 1. If that happens, some 10,000 teachers could be out of work and 70,000 students could be kicked out of Head Start programs, Duncan warned lawmakers. The cuts would also force an additional 14,000 Head Start workers to be laid off and would mean 1.2 million students from low-income families would have their schools’ funding cut. Washington also would stop paying its share of 7,200 special needs educators’ salaries.

If the White House wants to move ahead, officials are going to need help from the states to provide political cover and dollars alike. House Speaker John Boehner said Wednesday involving the federal government in early childhood education was “a good way to screw it up.” The Republican chairman of the House committee overseeing education policy, Rep. John Kline, R-Minn., was cool toward the proposal and was unlikely to support new spending on it. And even Obama’s allies acknowledged there was little Washington could do without governors’ help.

Kline said that “before we spend more taxpayer dollars on new programs, we must first review what is and is not working in existing initiatives, such as Head Start.”

Republicans and conservatives have questioned the effectiveness of Head Start programs, citing studies such as a Health and Human Services Department report last year showing that, while at-risk students enrolled in the pre-kindergarten programs saw tremendous gains in vocabulary and social development, those benefits largely faded by the time students reached third grade. The HHS report didn’t explain why the students saw a drop-off in performance or predict how they would fare as they aged.

“There’s reason for huge skepticism,” said Mike Petrilli, the executive vice president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, a conservative education think tank. “Most states are still in a ditch financially, and it’s going to be a couple years before they’re out of it. … I don’t know where the states are going to come up with the money for this.”

Scores of other studies, however, were more favorable toward the program, which has been shown to make at-risk students more likely to complete high school and avoid criminal arrests. In pure dollars and cents, academics called it a smart investment.

Comments (28) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
chascushman
6653
Points
chascushman 02/15/13 - 04:17 pm
1
0
I left one thing out
Unpublished

WB, I left one thing out. the community organizer knows how to lie very well.

Willow Bailey
20605
Points
Willow Bailey 02/15/13 - 07:28 pm
0
0
Yes, chas, exceedingly so.

Yes, chas, exceedingly so.

bumblebeerose
694
Points
bumblebeerose 02/16/13 - 01:54 am
0
0
Early Education

Any thing before Pre-K is just babysitting. All children can get in Pre-K either at a public school or a daycare funded Pre-K program. My child went to a daycare funded Pre-K and all we paid for was before and after school care.

What needs to be done with the money is spend it on grades K-12 those are the areas that need the help the most. They do not have enough good teachers or the class sizes are to big for the teachers to spend one on one time with children that need extra help. You have children that are trying but need some extra help the teachers do not have it to give and the child falls behind. Either make the class sizes smaller or put two teachers in the class. That way the children that need extra help can get it.

Starting children out at two and three years of age is not going to help when they get in middle school and have problems with math or something else. Lets use some common sense here. Oh but the government does not have common sense!!!!!

Willow Bailey
20605
Points
Willow Bailey 02/16/13 - 12:47 pm
0
0
And parents who are able

And parents who are able should volunteer their time and service to their children's teachers. I spent many hours at school in my child's early years. Even 30 minutes a day committed to paper grading or prep work makes a huge difference to a teacher.

Love and support your child, school and teachers. They need all the help they can get.

Back to Top
loading...
Top headlines

City Ink: New board means more work for me

First Mayor-elect Hardie Davis will be sworn in, and the very next day the work will begin. Commissioners will meet and the gavel will fall. It will be a brand new day at City Hall.
Search Augusta jobs