Government SPLOST 7 | | | Editor

Columbia County OKs rezoning at Knob Hill

Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012 8:02 PM
Last updated 8:20 PM
  • Follow Government

The Columbia County Commission heard arguments for and against a rezoning proposal that, if things go the property owner’s way, will never net him a dime of profit.

The agenda item was for the rezoning of a parcel of land outside the entrance to the Knob Hill subdivision off William Few Parkway. The property owner, Robert Pollard, wanted the property rezoned from agricultural to residential use, with the intent of subdividing the lot, which is a little more than two acres, and sell them for development.

At issue was the concern that houses built on three lots would detract from and lower the property values of the large estate-style homes in the immediate area.

Carl Dowling, the acting president of the Knob Hill Property Owners Association said that while he understood that leaving the property as is was probably unfeasible, the property owners association would like to propose dividing the land into two lots instead of three and maintaining a buffer between the lots and the street and adjoining property. In return, he said, the Association would grant the owners of properties built there full use of Knob Hill amenities and membership in the Association. He said that should raise property values.

“Our concern is that whatever you put there is the first thing people will see when they drive into Knob Hill,” he said.

He said talks with Pollard and his representative Keith Lawrence were ongoing and he felt certain an agreement could be reached.

Lawrence, speaking on behalf of Pollard, said the main goal for the property was to maximize profitability. Pollard, he explained, plans to donate the proceeds from the sale of the land to the Westminster Schools.

In the end, the commission decided that how the land was divided and what concessions were made had no bearing on the rezoning decision. The matter at hand was determining whether rezoning was responsible and appropriate. Commission Chairman Ron Cross said the number of similarly zoned plots in the immediate area made approval an obvious choice.

“This transition just seems appropriate,” he said.

Also approved at the meeting were two improvement projects at the Savannah Rapids Pavilion and Evans Towne Center Park. The first is the replacement of the wooden decking at the pavilion with a composite material. Additional improvements will include bringing the railings up to current code. The project will cost $279,700 and be funded from interest from the Special Local Option Sales Tax fund.

The second project is the construction of entry and exit gates at the Evans Towne Center Park.

“Ideally these gates would have been put in place when the park was built,” Cross said. “But for whatever reason they weren’t. What we know is that they are required for things like security and traffic control.”

The gates will cost $98,000 and be funded through SPLOST.

Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
wildman 11/07/12 - 05:48 am
Double Cross

For whatever reason the gates were not installed when the part was built, as the commission chairman you don't know why? Why not? That's part of your job or at least someone reporting to you should know.

resident 11/07/12 - 12:13 pm
COST $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

What are these deck boards made of gold or something? That seems a bit pricey for something so simple as guardrail and boards. The $98K for a gate?????? What are buying here.. For that cost you could build a small house come on I keep hearing them say they are frugal with money but this seems a bit more of the extravagant range to me.

CryoCyberTronics 11/07/12 - 08:24 pm
The savannah River and the

The savannah River and the Augusta Canal area land still belongs to Augusta Richmond County. Any future development done there should have to be approved by the Augusta Commissioners and or Augusta Voters. That way Columbia County cant't make a big mess of Augusta's City owned land. All Columbia County is concern about is their property taxes being lowered. The people in Augusta who are more concerned about trying to take over downtown Augusta should also think about being concern about the rapids area along the Savannah River also because it's part of Augusta''s history...!

CryoCyberTronics 11/08/12 - 10:06 am
In high School at L.C.L. We

In high School at L.C.L. We had our History of Augusta class tour and the Augusta Rapids was a stop of one of the sites that we visited So I know that I'm not the only Augustan that knows the importance of that area of the city and how much it should remain in the city of Augusta control...!!!

CryoCyberTronics 11/08/12 - 10:16 am
In the Metro Atlanta Area

In the Metro Atlanta Area Counties they take their county borders and county line serious from the intrusion from other counties. In Atlanta-Fulton county something like this would never been allowed to be taking place.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs
Top headlines
Class action lawsuit to proceed against Sentinel Offender Services
Friday's ruling by Judge Daniel J. Craig means that anyone sentenced for a misdemeanor offense in Columbia County Superior Court may be a party to the lawsuit that seeks to recover from Sentinel ...