Government

More News | | | Editor

Georgia speaker to propose ban on lobbyists' gifts

  • Follow Government

ATLANTA — House Speaker David Ralston said Saturday that he will propose banning lobbyists from giving gifts to state lawmakers, a decision that comes after residents voted overwhelmingly in favor of nonbinding referendums that set limits.

Lobbyists can now spend as much as they want to influence Georgia’s state lawmakers as long as they disclose that spending in public reports. Ralston, the top Republican in the House, said he supports the current disclosure rules and has opposed legislation that would have limited – though not banned – lobbyist spending on lawmakers. He called lobbying caps a “gimmick” Saturday and said they could be abused. He said he planned to introduce the measure banning gifts outright when the General Assembly reconvenes next year.

About 81 percent of Georgia voters, or more than 1 million people, voted in favor of limiting what lobbyists can spend on state lawmakers in separate ballot questions in the Republican and Democratic primaries July 31.

“I’ve said that if we ever decided to move away from that system, I thought the alternative would be a prohibition,” said Ralston, R-Blue Ridge. “I think that you know we have a ballot question that the people of Georgia expressed their opinion. I don’t think they were given all the options they should have been given. And so I think that if we’re going to give Georgia real and serious reform, this is the only way to do it.”

He said he planned to create a study group when the General Assembly reconvenes in January to examine how other states ban lobbyist gifts.

Ralston said the outcome of the referendum was only part of the motivation behind his decision. The question on the Democratic ballot asked voters whether they wanted to end rules that allow for unlimited lobbyist spending. The Republican ballot asked whether voters would support a $100 cap on gifts to lawmakers, though there was no explanation of how it would work.

“I think it’s sort of a feel-good gimmick that’s being espoused by people who are looking for a platform to be relevant,” said Ralston, refusing to name whom he was speaking about.

Ralston’s stance might put him in conflict with Senate Republicans. Sen. Joshua McKoon, R-Columbus, said he plans to re-introduce legislation that would ban lobbyists from spending more than $100 on a lawmaker in a single day. This year, Republican leaders buried a similar proposal from McKoon in the Senate Rules Committee, and it failed without receiving a vote. After learning of Ralston’s remarks, McKoon said he would consult with his colleagues and consider lowering his proposed cap.

McKoon said he wanted to know whether an outright ban could have unintended consequences. For example, he questioned whether lobbyists who are banned from directly giving gifts to lawmakers could instead host events for political parties where lawmakers are wined and dined.

Still, he called Ralston’s stance “tremendous progress.”

“I think if we’re all agreeing we need to bring this practice under control, that’s light years ahead of where we were” at the end of this year’s legislative session, McKoon said.

Debbie Dooley, an organizer for the Georgia Tea Party Patriots, said she welcomed Ralston’s announcement but wanted to make sure his intent was not to spark a legislative conflict that defeats tighter lobbying rules. Tea party supporters were part of alliance that pushed this year for a $100 cap on lobbyist spending.

“We think voters will actually see through any political games or ploys in an attempt to kill caps on lobbyist gifts,” she said.

Comments (3)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
ConcernedTaxpayer
28
Points
ConcernedTaxpayer 08/12/12 - 07:38 am
0
0

Lobbyists

I think lobbyists should be banned completely both in the state and at the federal level.

Riverman1
70394
Points
Riverman1 08/12/12 - 08:05 am
0
0

Ben Harbin

This does nothing to stop Rep. Ben Harbin from having dinner and drinks with the pretty lobbyist as she reported in her disclosure form. It's not always about the money spent.

JRC2024
6954
Points
JRC2024 08/12/12 - 09:55 am
0
0

365 x $100.00 is $36500.00

365 x $100.00 is $36500.00 per year. Quite alot of money added to the reps pay. I vote no on any giving to any represenative doing state or federal work.

Back to Top

Loading...