NRC questions Savannah River Site radiation models

Long-term releases of radiation at issue

Friday, May 4, 2012 4:01 PM
Last updated 9:34 PM
  • Follow Government

The Nuclear Regulatory Com­mission disagrees with models used by the U.S. Ener­gy Department to calculate radiation risks from Savan­nah River Site’s saltstone low-level waste disposal site.

Saltstone, a mixture of low-level radioactive waste and cementlike grout, is pumped into underground vaults at the site, where it hardens to a stable, permanent form.

In a 289-page technical evaluation released Friday, the NRC concluded that the Saltstone Disposal Facility vaults meet most performance objectives, including resistance to intrusion from groundwater, protection of workers who operate the site and stability against earthquakes.

“However, based on its evaluation of DOE’s results and independent sensitivity analyses conducted with DOE’s models, the NRC staff no longer has reasonable assurance that DOE’s disposal activities meet the performance objective for protection of the general population from releases of radioactivity,” the report said.

The saltstone is a byproduct of ongoing efforts to dispose of 36 million gallons of material left over from Cold War nuclear weapons programs. The waste, stored in 49 underground tanks – some of which are leaking – is separated into two streams, with high-level material sent to the Defense Waste Processing Facility to be encased in glass, or “vitrified.”

The remaining low-level waste is the focus of the NRC’s report, which concluded that any ill effects could occur thousands of years after the site is officially “closed,” or permanently capped with soil. For example, one DOE model forecasts excessive radiation releases after 10,000 years, while the NRC says it could be closer to 8,000 years.

Nothing in the report indicates a current threat of release of radiation, and there is no effort to halt activity at the project, which is also subject to oversight from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.

“We stand by ready to work with the Nuclear Reg­ula­tory Commission and the U.S. Department of Ener­gy to resolve concerns raised in the NRC’s report on SRS’ Saltstone Disposal Facility,” DHEC Director Cath­erine Templeton said in a statement issued Friday on the findings. “We’ve seen the report, and we’ve already begun a careful consideration of the issues. We’ll evaluate any specific recommendations that might arise from resolution of the NRC concerns.”

Jim Giusti, an Energy De­part­ment spokesman at the site, said department officials will work to resolve any differences of opinion among agencies.

“The department is committed to the safe and compliant disposal of low activity radioactive waste, such as saltstone, and to ensure that the saltstone disposal process is protective of human health and the environment,” he said.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Radwaste
408
Points
Radwaste 05/04/12 - 11:48 pm
1
0
Rob, although I am not

Rob, although I am not authorized to speak for SRS, I urge you to be more detailed in the statement, "some of which are leaking". This suggests that waste tank contents are being lost to the underground aquifer. That is not happening.

As you may find out through official channels or by asking at a meeting the Citizen's Advisory Board, some older waste tanks have leaked waste into their secondary containment, called an "annulus"; these leak sites, now inactive due to solidification of the waste or due to lowering the affected tank's level, are monitored with cameras and care is taken to see that they are not "reactivated".

Again, contact official channels or attend a CAB meeting to get details.

etlinks
21188
Points
etlinks 05/05/12 - 07:46 am
0
0
Very good comment Radwaste.

Very good comment Radwaste.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Developer fined by Georgia EPD

The developer of a Grovetown subdivision has been fined by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division for failing to control erosion and other water quality control violations.
Search Augusta jobs