Senate panel tables Augusta election bill

  • Follow Government

ATLANTA — The Senate Ethics Committee voted along party lines Wednesday to table legislation that sought to make clear that Augusta’s municipal elections could be held in November.

The House has already passed a separate bill switching them to July.

Both measures arose because a law enacted last year to move the election of judges to July also included nonpartisan races in consolidated governments, which includes Augusta-Richmond County and six others.

“The unintended consequence has proved problematic to us in Augusta,” said Sen. Hardie Davis, D-Augusta.

Augusta officials are planning to hold this year’s balloting in November along with the presidential contest. They are relying on a letter from the Attorney General’s Office that says the city charter trumps last year’s law, but other consolidated governments like Athens and Columbus are holding theirs during this summer’s Republican and Democratic primaries.

The bill tabled Wednesday, Senate Bill 298 sponsored by Davis who serves on the committee, would have allowed local legislative delegations to move the dates of elections without involving the entire General Assembly.

Davis told his colleagues his approach is better than the House version going the other way, sponsored by Rep. Barbara Sims, R-Augusta, because his has the support of the Augusta Commission and legislators from other consolidated governments.

Sen. George Hooks, D-Americus, represents two of them in Chattahoochee County and Webster County, one of Georgia’s smallest at a population of just 2,000.

“They have no problem with doing this,” he said.

Sen. John Albers, R-Roswell, moved to table the bill saying other senators who couldn’t attend the meeting had concerns.

“Well, who are they?” Hooks asked. “If a senator has a concern with Richmond County, they should take it to the Augusta delegation.”

The 4-3 vote stalled the bill unless another vote at a later meeting revives it. Chairman John Crosby, R-Tifton, declined to answer a senator’s question about whether he would schedule another meeting in time for a revived SB 298 to pass the Senate before midnight on March 7, the deadline for bills to pass one legislative chamber or die.

Sims’ bill has already beat the deadline by passing the House. It is pending in the Senate Ethics Committee but hasn’t been scheduled for a hearing yet.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
dichotomy
37645
Points
dichotomy 02/29/12 - 01:24 pm
0
0
Yeh, let's not do anything

Yeh, let's not do anything that would allow the citizens to focus on the local candidates and issues. No sir. Not in Augusta. It's for sure that our candidates NEED to crawl under the cover of a national election. We don't want to shine much light on that rat's nest.

“The unintended consequence has proved problematic to us in Augusta,”

I notice old Hardie Davis didn't specify who "us" was.

Little Lamb
49258
Points
Little Lamb 02/29/12 - 01:34 pm
0
0
Good point, Dichotomy.

Good point, Dichotomy. Davis' use of racial code words is unbecoming for a Georgia Senator.

Note that Davis not only didn't specify who "us" was; he also did not explain a single "problem."

And he couldn't even specify what "unintended consequence" he was talking about. How could there be unintended consequences exposed when the first election is going to be in July, 2012? You have to actually hold the election and install the officials to actually expose or reveal an unintended consequence.

The trouble is, this is one legislator talking to another. It does not make sense to ordinary people.

Little Lamb
49258
Points
Little Lamb 02/29/12 - 03:32 pm
0
0
I was just thinking about

I was just thinking about this from the article:

The bill tabled Wednesday, Senate Bill 298 sponsored by Davis who serves on the committee, would have allowed local legislative delegations to move the dates of elections without involving the entire General Assembly.

Why not just allow cities and counties to do their local elections whenever they want to do it? This appears to be a naked power grab for Davis, Murphy, and Howard.

Back to Top
loading...
Search Augusta jobs