Government

More News | | | Editor

Blue Ribbon Commission suggests nuclear waste program overhaul

New nuke agency suggested

Thursday, Jan. 26, 2012 2:39 PM
Last updated Friday, Jan. 27, 2012 4:25 AM
  • Follow Government

America’s stalled nuclear waste management program stands little chance of moving forward without a complete overhaul, a federal panel concluded after a two-year assessment commissioned by the U.S. Energy Department.

“Put simply, this nation’s failure to come to grips with the nuclear waste issue has already proved damaging and costly,” the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future concluded in a 180-page final report issued Thursday.

The panel, whose investigation included visits to Savannah River Site and Augusta, was formed in the wake of the Obama administration’s decision to cancel the Yucca Mountain project in Nevada. The Yucca Mountain site was to become the nation’s primary permanent storage site for spent commercial nuclear reactor fuel and defense wastes from SRS and similar facilities.

Among the suggestions for solving today’s problems, commissioners proposed the creation of a new government organization dedicated solely to nuclear waste issues and also proposed giving that agency access to billions of dollars collected by utilities for that purpose.

Although the commission was directed not to recommend or evaluate specific sites, or take a position on the suitability of the government’s Yucca Mountain site, its members reiterated that a deep geologic repository remains essential to nuclear waste disposal and suggested interim storage sites could safely and temporarily be used to store the materials.

“The conclusion that disposal is needed and that deep geologic disposal is the scientifically preferred approach has been reached by every expert panel that has looked at the issue and by every other country that is pursuing a nuclear waste management program.”

The panel also concluded that a system in which the federal government forces nuclear waste on communities where it is not wanted is a no-win situation, and urged a more cooperative siting process.

“In practical terms, this means encouraging communities to volunteer to be considered to host a new nuclear waste management facility while also allowing for the waste management organization to approach communities that it believes can meet the siting requirements,” the report said.

Another recommendation unveiled Thursday suggests an overhaul in guidelines for transporting nuclear waste and spent fuel.

Although transportation programs are satisfactory, the surge in the volume of waste that could eventually be moved from commercial reactors to “interim storage” sites could warrant new safety programs.

“Given that transportation represents a crucial link in the overall storage and disposal system, it will be important to allow substantial lead-time to assess and resolve transportation issues well in advance of when materials would be expected to actually begin shipping to a new facility,” the report said.

The commission also reiterated doubts on reprocessing of nuclear waste, which would still create a final waste stream requiring disposal and also poses proliferation risks.

Spent fuel is stored at the nation’s 104 nuclear power plants, including Plant Vogtle, just south of Augusta. The nationwide inventory of 75,000 tons could expand to 150,000 tons by 2050, even if no more reactors are built.

ABOUT THE STRATEGY

Key elements of Blue Ribbon Commission nuclear waste strategy:

1. A new, consent-based approach to siting future nuclear waste management facilities.

2. A new organization dedicated solely to implementing the waste management program and empowered with the authority and resources to succeed.

3. Access to the funds nuclear utility ratepayers are providing for the purpose of nuclear waste management.

4. Prompt efforts to develop one or more geologic disposal facilities.

5. Prompt efforts to develop one or more consolidated storage facilities.

6. Prompt efforts to prepare for the eventual large-scale transport of spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste to consolidated storage and disposal facilities when such facilities become available.

7. Support for continued U.S. innovation in nuclear energy technology and for workforce development.

8. Active U.S. leadership in international efforts to address safety, waste management, non-proliferation, and security concern

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
copperhead
1035
Points
copperhead 01/26/12 - 04:55 pm
0
0
Now there needs to be a "blue

Now there needs to be a "blue ribbon" panel to form a "blue ribbon" committee to study the findings of the "blue ribbon commission" on nuclear waste.

SCEagle Eye
895
Points
SCEagle Eye 01/26/12 - 05:40 pm
0
0
H-Canyon boosters got zip out

H-Canyon boosters got zip out of the BRC. After all that lobbying and endless comments by SRS officials about awaiting the BRC's recommendations on the status of the H-Canyon they drew a total blank. Lobbying overload, perhaps. So, no endorsement of research reactor spent fuel reprocessing or commercial reprocessing R&D in the aging H-Canyon reprocessing plant. What's the next PR push to keep extracting $150 million/year of tax payer money, a sweet gift to SRS by big government, H-Canyon boosters?

Clean Water
11
Points
Clean Water 01/27/12 - 01:10 pm
0
0
Today we Prosper, but what

Today we Prosper, but what about tomorrow. For the sake of a few dollars we compromise the future of our children and our environment. For years Aiken County, Columbia County and other have built there communities from the exploits of the Nuclear Industries. The people that have suffered are people who live below, Allendale, Barnwell, Bamberg Counties and people who get there water from Savannah River. To ask a community or bribe a poor community with mony, to bury nuclear waste beneath there community is immoral. These communities suffer, like communities below our Nuclear Sites, while others will surely prosper.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Do Georgia colleges need so many sports?

ATLANTA -- The Board of Regents auditing staff is looking at athletic programs at the 30 Georgia schools that offer intercollegiate sports.
Search Augusta jobs