Government

More News | Augusta Comm. | Columbia Co. | Aiken Co. | Aiken | Editor

Bill backed by Ga. House leaders sets framework for major tax changes

  • Follow Government

ATLANTA -- A bill introduced this week with the support of Senate and House leaders sets the framework for a systematic study of Georgia's tax system this summer and fall by a blue-ribbon committee and creates an extraordinary mechanism for submitting any recommendations it may produce to next year's Legislature.

Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle and House Speaker David Ralston have a morning news conference planned at the Capitol to outline their thinking for the proposal.

House Bill 1405 makes no mention of the state's current budget problems but potentially provides a path lawmakers can travel if they wish to make fundamental, long-term changes and gives them a fall-guy to blame (a blue-ribbon commission) if the political fallout is too hot.

The bill, first of all, creates an entity to be known as the 2010 Special Council on Tax Reform and Fairness for Georgians. Its job is to conduct a thorough study of the current revenue structure and to report its findings to the speaker of the House and the lieutenant governor no later than Jan. 10, 2011.

The bill even names who is on the committee: Economists Jeff Humphreys, Roger Tutterow and Christine Ries; lameduck Gov. Sonny Perdue; former Gov. Zell Miller; the 2010 president of the Georgia Chamber and the 2010 state director for the National Federal of Independent Business, and two members appointed by the lieutenant governor and two by the speaker.

Next, the bill creates an entity called the Special Joint Committee on Georgia Revenue Structure, composed of the president pro tem of the Senate and the speaker pro tem of the House; the majority leaders of both chambers; the minority leaders of both chambers; the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee; two House members appointed by the speaker, including one from the minority party; two members appointed by the lieutenant governor, including one from the minority party.

Here's where things really get interesting:

The proposed new joint committee will cause to be introduced in the 2011 session one or more bills carrying out the recommendations of the blue-ribbon panel "without significant changes."

That legislation, after being read, will be referred back to the joint committee for action. If the joint committee recommends a "do pass" or a "do pass by committee substitute," the proposed legislation goes first to the House, where it will bypass the Rules Committee and is eligible to be called for consideration at any time fixed by the Speaker. But the legislation only can receive an "up or down" vote. It cannot be amended.

The same process is followed in the Senate.

It is highly unusual to make fundamental changes in the way legislation is presented to and considered by the General Assembly, but there is some precedent. In 1972, then-Gov. Jimmy Carter's governmental reorganization bill was presented to the Legislature in a reverse-veto sort of affair - any portion of the bill that the Legislature didn't object to - or "veto" - automatically took effect.

The No. 1 sponsor of the bill is Rep. Larry O'Neal, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. He is followed, in order, by Ralston, Majority Leader Jerry Keen, Speaker Pro Tem Jan Jones and others.

O'Neal told The Macon Telegraph's Travis Fain that the legislation potentially sets the stage for "a total overhaul," explaining further: "The concept is that our revenue system has not kept up with our growth."

The commission could look at sales taxes and the 100-plus sales-tax exemptions that exist in the current tax code. It also could look at reducing income and corporate taxes, as well as the state's capital gains tax.

But O'Neal told Fain that altering the local property tax system, as former Speaker Glenn Richardson sought to do with his unsuccessful GREAT plan, is a nonstarter. This review wouldn't seek to do away with property taxes or "impact local taxes at all," O'Neal said.

Comments (8)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
tstoney
0
Points
tstoney 03/18/10 - 11:10 am
0
0

Hmmm sounds like a classic

Hmmm sounds like a classic Obama move to me. Look out folks they have a new screwdriver in their hands.

Many Arrows
0
Points
Many Arrows 03/18/10 - 11:42 am
0
0

One wonders how this will

One wonders how this will 'square' with their no-tax-increase pledges.

These folks are no more capable of cutting spending than Obama.

Tax increases are coming and they will be HUGE.

Chillen
0
Points
Chillen 03/18/10 - 11:50 am
0
0

Make no mistake about it,

Make no mistake about it, these committees have not been set up to save the taxpayers any money. They are looking for any way possible to slip through increases in order to continue to feed the government consumption machine.

I agree with many arrows. Tax increases are coming - state and federal. And they will be significant.

snoopdawg99
0
Points
snoopdawg99 03/18/10 - 11:54 am
0
0

B.O.H.I.C.A.

B.O.H.I.C.A.

Chillen
0
Points
Chillen 03/18/10 - 11:57 am
0
0

you got it snoopdawg!

you got it snoopdawg!

dichotomy
428
Points
dichotomy 03/18/10 - 12:08 pm
0
0

And they, just like the

And they, just like the healthcare bill, all of the politicians are inventing vehicles to raise our taxes and fees in a way that they will not have to put their name on the blame line. Put every incumbent out of office for the next 3 or 4 election cycles. After we have their attention we can watch the new folks' voting records and only re-elect the ones who can balance a checkbook without raising taxes.

disssman
0
Points
disssman 03/18/10 - 12:16 pm
0
0

Kinda what would happen if

Kinda what would happen if the U.S. went to a flat tax. Just increase state taxes to make up the deficit. One thing for sure, they will insure their friends (stakeholders) aren't impacted. Why not just get rid of all the special exemptions?

hhwilli
0
Points
hhwilli 03/18/10 - 01:00 pm
0
0

Hopefully, they will take a

Hopefully, they will take a hard look at a 'value added tax' as an option.

Back to Top
Top headlines

SC lawmaker faces DUI charge

COLUMBIA - A South Carolina state representative running for the state's newly created 7th Congressional District seat is facing weapons and drunken driving charges.
Online Database by Caspio
Click here to load this Caspio Online Database.

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1503/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1502/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1501/
  • title http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1498/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1483/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1487/
  • title http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1497/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1495/ http://spotted.augusta.com/galleries/1494/
Lady A at the JBA - Wednesday
Loading...