Education More News |

Richmond County school meals already close to stringent new federal nutrition standards

Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012 10:42 PM
Last updated Friday, Feb. 3, 2012 5:29 AM
  • Follow Education

While schools across the country reevaluate their lunch lines to comply with new federal standards, the Richmond County school system has only a few menu changes to make by the July 1 deadline.

Back | Next
Bryel Berry eats an apple and laughs with Donquarius Rhodes during lunch at Langford Middle School. New rules limit middle school lunches to 700 calories.  ZACH BOYDEN-HOLMES/STAFF
Bryel Berry eats an apple and laughs with Donquarius Rhodes during lunch at Langford Middle School. New rules limit middle school lunches to 700 calories.

As part of the 2010 Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, the Obama administration introduced new rules in late January that will require more fruit, vegetables and whole grains; less salt; and only low-fat milk be served to U.S. public school students by the start of the 2012-13 school year.

Richmond County cafeteria servers already have banned whole milk and fried foods – they even bake french fries – and make sure all hot dogs and sandwiches are served on whole-wheat buns.

“Our meals are nutritious,” said school nutrition director Josephine Mack. “A lot of these standards, we’re already doing.”

Because the district’s cafe­terias are already near compliance, Mack said the only changes that she foresees are more portions of fruits and vegetables every day, less canned fruit and less sodium.

According to the U.S. De­partment of Agriculture, the new guidelines will limit elementary lunches to 650 calories, middle school to 700 calories and high school to 850 calories.

The overhaul is the first set of changes made to the National School Lunch Pro­gram in 15 years.

Langford Middle School food nutrition manager Sandra Widener said schools are already monitoring sodium levels and include two to three servings of fresh fruit every week.

“We’re constantly looking at ways to get them to eat vegetables,” she said. “We’re on top of things like low-fat dips and peanut butter to add to vegetables to make them more appealing.”

At Langford on Thursday, pupils piled Salisbury steak, whole-wheat buns, grilled chicken, seasoned rice, okra and tomato wedges, baked french fries and fresh pears onto their trays.

All of those choices would be in compliance with the new guidelines, but Widener said the cafeteria might have to add more sides of fruits and vegetables to the menu every day.

Langford seventh-grader Toni Chatman said she would be happy with more fruit options as long as no one touches her favorite macaroni and cheese offered every other Tuesday.

“I like lunchtime, and I wouldn’t mind more fruit,” she said.

The nutrition guidelines would have been more strenuous if not for a move by Congress in late 2011, which allowed tomato paste on pizza to count as a vegetable and blocked the Obama administration from limiting the amount of starchy vegetable servings each week.

According to the USDA, it will cost $3.2 billion in the next five years to implement the nutrition reform nationwide, but schools will receive an additional 6 cents per meal to cover cost.

Mack said she is still concerned because school nutrition departments are already strained with budget cuts and the high cost of food.

“As far as how much it will cost us, I haven’t the slightest idea,” Mack said.

Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Riverman1 02/03/12 - 05:56 am
The problem is the

The problem is the guidelines are wrong. Research is out now saying fried food is not bad for you. Fat is necessary in our diets. Whole wheat is fine, but entirely too many carbohydrates are in this new diet. If you want to eat healthy and prevent obesity, go back to how Americans ate around 1950. Meat and vegs. Dump the carb laden manufactured food full of high fructose corn syrup. Limit fruit to one serving a day.

copperhead 02/03/12 - 06:59 am
How did any of us survive

How did any of us survive without the government telling us what to eat? It is amazing that the government feels that we are too dumb to eat! What's next? Guidelines on what to wear,what to drive(already in the works),what to think(p/c)? Wait 'til they tax you on your carbon out-put,by then it will be too late to do anything but pay the tax. More regulations and laws for citizens and more freedoms for non-citizens is where this train headed.

agustinian 02/03/12 - 07:37 am
Why do we need the federal

Why do we need the federal government involved in school lunches? It's enough to make you want to vote for Ron Paul.

Note to Feds: LEAVE US ALONE!

seenitB4 02/03/12 - 09:04 am
Then the little kiddies go

Then the little kiddies go home & dig into the chips/dip....sit in front of the tv/puter.......
We had to stay outside & bikes.......we got a lot of exercise......that is missing today.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs