Education

More News | |

Judge rejects Keeton lawsuit

ASU requirements deemed 'legitimate'

  • Follow Education

Augusta State University's requirement that a graduate student read material about counseling gays and increase her exposure to that community after she objected to counseling homosexual clients was "academically legitimate," a federal court judge ruled Friday.

Jennifer Keeton
Jennifer Keeton

U.S. District Judge Randal Hall's decision enables university officials to expel Jennifer Keeton if she does not follow the remediation plan, which professors designed to "address issues of multicultural competence and develop understanding and empathy."

Hall said the case is not about "pitting Christianity against homosexuality," but rather the constitutionality of the school's requirement.

Professors asked Keeton to complete the remediation plan after she said she opposed homosexuality and would tell gay clients "their behavior is morally wrong and then help the client change that behavior," according to an affidavit filed in the case.

Keeton filed a lawsuit against the school in July, alleging the requirement was viewpoint discrimination and a violation of her First Amendment rights.

Hall ruled that Keeton "failed to clearly establish her high burden of persuasion of a 'substantial likelihood' of success of the merits of her case."

She provided no evidence that ASU faculty imposed the remediation plan because they personally disagreed with her views, Hall said.

In an Aug. 11 hearing, ASU professors testified that the plan was not a punishment for voicing her beliefs, but a tool to teach Keeton how to counsel clients while not imposing her views.

"All three professors testified that they never told (Keeton) that she was required to change her religious beliefs in order to stay in the counseling program," Hall wrote.

He noted that Keeton did not testify at the hearing nor present any witnesses in support of her motion.

Hall said Keeton's unwillingness to adhere to the school's viewpoint-neutral code of ethics set by the American Counseling Association constitutes a refusal to complete the curriculum.

Without completing the remediation plan, Keeton was unable to begin classes at the college as part of a practicum. A filing by her lawyers earlier this week said she had begun the work at Augusta Christian School.

Hall ruled the plan was simply a way to teach Keeton how to counsel all demographics of clients.

"It was not (Keeton's) personal beliefs that were their concern, but rather only her inability to separate her personal beliefs in the judgment-free zone of a professional counseling situation," Hall said.

Comments (220) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Marlene
0
Points
Marlene 09/01/10 - 05:21 pm
0
0
Lupaz, do you *really*

Lupaz, do you *really* believe that? A legitimate professor wouldn't force a student into that scenario, even if they *were* LGBT!!

stage9
3
Points
stage9 06/29/12 - 12:35 pm
1
0
Hilarious! Judges who moonlight as Philosophers!

"It was not (Keeton's) personal beliefs that were their concern, but rather only her inability to separate her personal beliefs in the judgment-free zone of a professional counseling situation," Hall said.

What a CROCK! There is NO SUCH THING as a "separation of personal beliefs" -- except in the realm of liberal ethics! (which is itself an oxymoron!)

So should she be compelled to “separate her personal beliefs in the judgment-free zone of a professional counseling situation” if a future client wants to off himself or someone else? Should she, or should she NOT have an “absolutist philosophical” belief about such things?

If she informs her client that he has a lot to live for, she has just rendered an OPINION and has crossed over into the realm of "personal beliefs"! However, if she informs him that HE HAS TO MAKE THE DECISION whether to off himself or another on his own, and he follows through with it, she has become an accessory! She could have prevented a loss of life but chose instead NOT to invoke "her personal beliefs in the judgment-free zone of a professional counseling situation”.

It seems to me, in this day and age of convoluted reason and twisted morals, that fools get to impose the full measure of their foolishness while the morally sane and intellectually honest are brushed aside.

I would tell Augusta State to suck it and then re-enroll in a REAL university whose principles encourage the burgeoning of free thought unfettered by imbecilic ethics. Don’t harlot yourself with these morally confused reprobates any longer.

“She was expelled.” GOOD! They did you a favor! They will no longer be able to corrupt and twist you into a mindless pretzel any longer. Too many young people are coming out of these incubators of imbecility with minds of mush…twisted and distorted by liberal head cases. Be thankful. You’ve been rid of their disease. You’re CURED! You’re FREE! Now go forth and think for yourself...

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs