Crime & Courts Richmond Co. | Columbia Co. | Aiken Co. |

Georgia House committee advances bill empowering for-profit probation companies

Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014 7:33 PM
Last updated Sunday, Dec. 27, 2015 12:58 AM
  • Follow Crime & courts

As Superior Court Judge Daniel J. Craig predicted at one of the court hearings concerning Sentinel Offender Services, efforts are underway to change the law governing private probation companies.

This week, members of the Georgia House’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee advanced a bill that gives private, for-profit probation companies powers that Craig ruled they didn’t have under the current law.

In September, Craig ruled that two common practices – the extension of probation sentences past the original terms and electronic monitoring – are practices the state law specifically reserves for probation officers employed by the state.

Sentinel is appealing Craig’s ruling, which affects 13 civil lawsuits pending in the Superior Courts in Richmond and Columbia counties. The plaintiffs’ attorneys also have appealed Craig’s ruling that the use of private, for-profit probation companies is not in principle, unconstitutional.

“This Act is being enacted in response to the decision of the Superior Court of Richmond County in a series of cases in which the court found limitations on the use of such probation officers,” House Bill 837 reads.

While the authors contend the General Assembly didn’t intend for the law to keep certain powers from the for-profit probation firms, they aren’t waiting for the Supreme Court to decide what the law means.

The lead attorney who sued Sentinel, John B. Long, contends Sentinel has abused its ability to seek the jailing of probationers to increase corporate profits.

Private probation is big business.

Sentinel reported to its insurance company that in a single month in 2012, its profit was more than $1.8 million. About half of Sentinel’s contracts are in Georgia.

Long points to the fees Sentinel charges probationers for electronic monitoring. While the maximum fine for a misdemeanor in Georgia is $1,000, Sentinel charges a $6 daily fee for electronic monitoring and a $12 daily fee for electronic monitoring for alcohol consumption.

A probationer can pay $2,190 or $4,380, respectively, to Sentinel for a year of monitoring.

“None of those fees go to the government. This (bill) will enable a private company to collect more from the judicial system than the government collects in fines,” Long wrote by e-mail.

“More, importantly no judge or local government officials has required any disclosure about the profits made off the backs of working Georgians through this system. This bill, if passed, will lead to further abuse of the judicial system.”

In 2000, the General Assembly passed legislation that allows local governments to either create their own probation department to supervise the terms imposed for misdemeanor offenses and local ordinance violations, or contract with private, for-profit companies.

While the legislation keeps the supervision of felony probation terms under the state Department of Corrections, one of the first private probation companies hired a member of the state’s parole board to lobby legislators to remove that restriction. Bobby Whitworth, who had also served as the commission of the prison and probation system, was convicted of public corruption.

In recent years, the Private Probation Association of Georgia has hired various lobbyists in Atlanta.

The association, private probation companies and people who work in probation services have contributed more than $140,000 to state political campaigns, according to records maintained by the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission.

According to the association, at the end of 2012 one in 40 Georgia residents was on misdemeanor probation.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
avidreader 01/30/14 - 08:56 am
The Judge!

Isn't it the judge's job to decide which individual cases require monitoring? If the judge elects not to require monitoring, then Sentinel must step back. Please let me know if this is correct or not.

If sentinel has the power, then the system is broken. Excluding DUI, I think it would be safe to say that most probationers simply pay their fines and move on with their lives. Breaking the law should have a cost, but if it is so profitable, why doesn't Richmond County do it? And yes, I think I already know the answer -- government cannot manage a bureaucracy that requires its workers to actually turn a profit. However, the Licensing & Inspection department is doing it; they just got approved to hire 10 new workers because the department actually turns a profit. Why not a probation department? If the County Commission would allow a probation department to operate without interference, then it might work. But . . .

Lunaville 01/30/14 - 10:13 am
For-Profit Prison and Probation Companies are Slavers

For-Profit Prison and Probation Companies are Slavers. Sometimes it is necessary for society to deprive an individual of his Liberty in order to protect peace, justice, and public safety. However, no person should ever be allowed to profit from the removal of another's Liberty. The State of Georgia should be resuming the functions of these companies and driving them out of our borders - not empowering them.

GiantsAllDay 01/30/14 - 01:38 pm
I would like for the AC to

I would like for the AC to check into Sentinel's lobbyists' activities in Atlanta. Looks like the lobby boys got to those under the golden dome. Follow the money.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs