Plaintiffs fight high court's ruling in Sentinel case

Thursday, Oct. 31, 2013 5:03 PM
Last updated Friday, Nov. 1, 2013 1:19 AM
  • Follow Crime & courts

Those suing the private probation firm Sentinel Offender Services have begun filing motions asking the Georgia Supreme Court to reconsider its order last month that freed the Rich­mond County State Court to continue business as usual.



The state high court on Oct. 24 granted Sentinel’s petition that sought to set aside restrictions that Superior Court Judge Daniel J. Craig set to prohibit what he determined were illegal practices
in misdemeanor probation cases supervised by private, for-profit companies.

Craig ruled that state law allows state probation officers to perform only certain functions. Specifically, he ruled that probation terms supervised by private companies could not be extended past the
original sentence, and that electronic monitoring was not allowed in cases supervised by such companies.

Craig expressed concern that basic due process was denied in cases in which years would pass between Sen­tinel obtaining a probation violation warrant and the defendant getting a chance to defend himself.

“Sentinel has initiated over 5,000 arrest warrants against unsuspecting citizens who have been given no notice of their existence,” wrote the plaintiffs’ attorney, John Long. “Staying (Craig’s) order will have the effect of placing all of these people at risk for illegal detention and incarceration, and producing profits for Sentinel to which it is not legally entitled.”

The Supreme Court granted Sen­ti­nel’s request for an emergency act to stop Craig’s order, which the company and the Richmond Coun­ty State Court judges said had caused chaos and left the judges without authority to put anyone on probation.

The plaintiffs’ motions assert that any problem enforcing the order of the State Court judges has been caused by Sentinel’s actions or inactions. Long contends that Sentinel and the judges have known of the problems since civil litigation began in 2008 when an indigent woman pleaded guilty – without the advice of an attorney – to a crime she didn’t commit.

“Unfortunately, the State Court and Sentinel ignored this court’s decision and continued business as usual,” the plaintiffs’ motion stated.

Two years after Lisa Harrelson’s conviction was voided for constitutional violations, a disabled veteran living on $243 a month was jailed for not paying Sentinel’s $186 supervision fees.

The judge gave Hills McGee the option of paying Sentinel $186 or spending two months in jail, which would cost taxpayers about $3,000. McGee’s conviction also was voided for constitutional violations.

“The only emergency for Sen­ti­nel is that Judge Craig’s orders have stifled its income in that it can no longer keep individuals on misdemeanor probation for years after their sentences have terminated, and that it cannot generate fees from electronic monitoring for which has no fixed rate, no provision for waiving fees for indigents and no basis for charging under the private probation statute,” the motion stated.

The Supreme Court justices are not bound by any time limit to rule on the plaintiffs’ motions.

Oral arguments in the case are tentatively set for February.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
willie Lee
423
Points
willie Lee 11/01/13 - 03:02 am
1
0
Free Comedy
Unpublished

Please go to the Georgia Supreme Court web page and read some of its decisions. They are a joke!

mooseye
266
Points
mooseye 11/01/13 - 08:07 am
1
0
Its

all about the $$$$$$.

David Parker
7923
Points
David Parker 11/01/13 - 08:12 am
1
0
The courts aren't going to

The courts aren't going to open themselves up to a lawsuit by admitting they didn't adhere to procedure, which resulted in the unlawful operation of a private business used as an extension of the probation system of Georgia. I see no recourse unless you got some dirt on somebody up in ATL

Suomynona
4
Points
Suomynona 11/01/13 - 07:59 pm
0
0
Money game

I am afraid to post under my real name here as I am a current probationer under the supervision of Sentinel Offender Services. I was sentenced to 2 years of probation in 2010 and left the state due to work less than a year later. I checked back in with Sentinel immediately upon returning to the state, paid the entirety of my fine but still had to complete a couple of other court orders. Without any outside input, someone from Sentinel (I have no idea who) decided that my probation should begin anew from that day forward. It has been 2 years past the deadline for my probation to end and I remain on probation. I tried to reach my officer at Sentinel (voice mail) to reschedule an appointment when I went out of town for 4 days last year and when I returned home, found a letter from Sentinel stating that if I missed my appointment they would serve a warrant for my arrest. I have left at least 100 messages with various people at Sentinel but have yet to have any one of them return my call. I haven't been back to their office because I don't want to go to jail. I am a full time student and I don't work so I cannot afford to pay their fees. I barely have money for food and school.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Historic building on Laney campus demolished

The demolition of the 89-year-old Cauley-Wheeler building on the Lucy C. Laney High School campus is over, but the plan for a building that will act as a link to the former site and its story has ...
Search Augusta jobs