Confessed Augusta murderer seeks lighter sentence

Tuesday, April 16, 2013 11:02 AM
Last updated 8:56 PM
  • Follow Crime & courts

ATLANTA — A man who was 17 when he killed two people in Augusta 13 years ago is asking the Georgia Supreme Court for a lighter sentence because the nation’s top court outlawed the death penalty.

Marcus Rolando Moore changed his plea to guilty before the Richmond County jury that convicted him could sentence him to death. He agreed to take life without the possibility of parole and to never file an appeal in exchange for avoiding the lethal injection.

He had killed Neiteka Nicole Wesbey and Corey McMillian in 2000 and shot two other people, who survived.

At the time, state law permitted the death penalty for juveniles, but after he was behind bars, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that minors couldn’t be executed. His attorney, Stephen Reba, argues that ruling entitles Moore to a lighter sentence, even though he wasn’t sentenced to be executed.

The connection, Reba told the seven state justices, is that Georgia law at the time only allowed life without parole if someone was eligible for capital punishment. After the nation’s highest court concluded he would have been ineligible for the death penalty because of his age, then he was also ineligible for life without parole, Reba said.

“There’s some kind of confusion that we’re asking you to extend a judicial bridge when in fact this is just the natural consequence of what the Georgia General Assembly did in 1993,” he said, citing the year the Legislature enacted the eligibility for life without parole.

He would still have to serve the 60 year sentence for shooting the two victims who survived.

Deputy Attorney General Paula Smith said that Moore had signed an agreement that he wouldn’t appeal. She also pointed out that the federal court ruling against execution didn’t automatically invalidate his sentence because it hadn’t ruled specifically on that circumstance. Plus, the U.S. Supreme Court had already ruled that minors could be sentenced to life without parole.

“He’s the one who elected to stop the trial, get a voluntary plea agreement, go with what appeared to be a good deal at the time – life without parole on Count 1 and consecutive sentences for the other charges. He was fully aware of the consequences, and he’s the one that elected to do so,” she said.

The Georgia top court will decide in about four months whether their federal colleagues’ ruling gets Moore another sentence.

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Little Lamb
43884
Points
Little Lamb 04/16/13 - 11:39 am
5
0
Rules aren't important any more

It seems kind of sneaky to ask the judge to post-date a supreme court ruling.

lifelongresident
1317
Points
lifelongresident 04/16/13 - 11:41 am
0
0
"eyes be not fo sho did not
Unpublished

"eyes be not fo sho did not aint wanna git life witout parole...it aint no fo dit fair cause i be in jial lass 13 years and dat be enuff fo eye aint not gonna do dat again cause aint not bin in trubble in jail fo sho cause did dat aint dee skrit to fo..bah dooooo" now i am sure he found god and he is now sorry for the 2 lives he took...its best to keep him right where he is...he should have thought about the ramifications before he killed two people

David Parker
7923
Points
David Parker 04/16/13 - 11:52 am
5
0
No double jeopardy works both

No, double jeopardy works both ways in this respect. No need to go back and open up the trial/sentencing. No need whatsoever.

scoopdedoop64
2353
Points
scoopdedoop64 04/17/13 - 11:19 am
1
0
No Second Chances

The way I see it the people he killed can't come back from the dead to get a second chance at life again so why should he have a second chance to redo his sentence. Done is Done!

realitycheck09
307
Points
realitycheck09 04/17/13 - 04:42 pm
0
1
You guys miss the issue

You guys don't quite get the issue here. Essentially, he plead guilty to a sentence the Supreme Court now says is illegal. It's a little convoluted, but when he plead to Life Without Parole, that punishment was (basically) only possible in death penalty cases.

Well, the US Supreme Court now says that you can't execute a juvenile. So, if (a) you can't execute a juvenile and (b) life without parole was only available in death penalty cases, then (c) he should be re-sentenced to life with the possibility of parole. It's really pretty simple.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Man reports McCormick attack

A South Carolina man told police three men attempted to sexually assault him and then shot at him while he was bicycling in McCormick County late Saturday.
Search Augusta jobs