Crime & Courts Richmond Co. | Columbia Co. | Aiken Co. |

Child molestation case against Augusta woman in jury's hands

Wednesday, March 20, 2013 8:57 PM
Last updated 9:44 PM
  • Follow Crime & courts

A jury will return to deliberations Thursday morning in the child molestation case of an Augusta woman accused of having sex with a 13-year-old boy.

Dana Adams, 33, has pleaded not guilty to the charges and Wednesday she got the chance to tell her side to the Richmond County Superior Court jury. She said she didn’t do any of the crimes she is accused of committing.

Adams was the last witness in the case that began Monday. The jury deliberated about 90 minutes Wednesday before sending the judge a note indicating they wanted to stop for the night.

Adams testified that the allegations against her were made up in revenge because she reported to the sheriff’s department that the boyfriend of the alleged victim’s mother stole her debit card during a January 2012 visit to her home. The man threatened her, Adams testified, that if he was arrested the boy would say she molested him.

She had allowed the boy to spend weekends at her home occasionally so he could spend time with a young male relative of hers, Adams testified. The last time the alleged victim stayed, in the fall of 2011, nothing unusual happened, she said. The boys played video games, ate pizza and socialized with a couple of friends and a neighbor.

The alleged victim testified earlier in the week that Adams loaned him money to buy marijuana and drove him to meet the person who had the drugs. He testified she later smoked the marijuana with the boys, and had sex with him several times that weekend.

In their closing arguments to the jury Wednesday, both attorneys said the case came down to the credibility of the accused and her alleged victim.

Adams’ attorney, Mike Arrington of the public defender’s office, argued that the teen had been surrounded by a criminal element at the time of the allegations. Lying wasn’t a problem for a child who admitted to smoking marijuana almost daily after starting at the age of 12. The teen’s lack of details, his inability to remember details – including the date he said the sex occurred – should also render him unbelievable, Arrington contended.

Assistant District Attorney Melissa Marks countered that memory is not another word for credibility. She argued to the jury that Adams’ profusion of details was a story concocted to mesh with the details she heard from other witnesses who testified first.

Her denial that she aided the alleged victim in obtaining marijuana and smoking with the boy couldn’t be supported, Marks said, adding that the alleged victim and other witnesses testified at trial that she did do that.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
nocnoc 03/21/13 - 06:46 am
Not so hard to call this one.

Likely I'd vote innocent.

1.Based on the teens early and continued Drug use prior to the incident.

2. The official Sheriffs office earlier theft report and involved people.

3.) The fact that the public defender’s office put together a case good case instead of a plea deal.

4.) the victims claims sound too much like a Pipe Dream. "had sex with him several times that weekend." But then got the dates wrong. If a 13+ y/o got/gave/delivered "repeated" sex with an older women over one weekend, does anyone think he'd forget the dates or could keep his mouth shut at school?

Win or Lose, given the clear remarks and case presented by Mark Arrington of the public defender’s office, I see a good future for him in his own successful practice.

MarinerMan 03/21/13 - 08:47 am
I'm In Agreement

I agree nocnoc. I have not been in the courtroom, but just what I've read, leads me to believe as you do. It is great that it appears you think we have a great defender in the works.

nocnoc 03/21/13 - 09:36 am
Thanks MarinerMan - Good Defenders of the Law are needed

just as much as aggressive DA's and Judges willing to apply sentences according to the law and the crime.

Some of the above more frequently mentioned in our negative comments, are little more than magicians looking for legal loop holes to pull out of a hat, instead of justice.

It is refreshing to see what appears to be a lawyer working a case, instead of gaming it.

Darby 03/21/13 - 02:57 pm
"does anyone think he'd forget the dates...

or could keep his mouth shut at school?"
On part one of that question... Yes, I could..

On part two... Not likely...

I'll defer judgment...

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs