Motion for new trial denied in child molestation case

Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:05 PM
Last updated 10:31 PM
  • Follow Crime & courts

A motion for a new trial filed on behalf of an Augusta man convicted last fall of molesting a preschooler was denied Tuesday.

John Morris III, 45, has been serving a 25-year prison sentence since his August conviction in Richmond County Superior Court for aggravated child molestation and child molestation.

Defense attorney Richard Allen attacked the fairness of various aspects of the trial, starting with the inability to effectively cross-examine a 5-year-old child who refused to answer any questions about the allegations against Morris.

Allen also contended the defense was painted as the bad guys when the crying child’s mother, who was also in tears, brought the girl into the courtroom and asked, “Is this really necessary?” while looking at the defense table.

District Attorney Ashley Wright countered that while the child’s mother did make the statement in an emotionally charged trial, the judge immediately told the jury that the child was a witness at the court’s request, shifting any blame the jury might harbor away from either side.

Wright also contended that the child refused to answer questions about the accusation from either attorney. And, she said, the refusal could have led the jury to question the truthfulness of the videotaped statement of the girl telling an expert interviewer what happened.

Morris’ attorney also contended that the videotaped statement was unfairly given more weight because of comments sheriff investigators made while questioning his client. A recording of that statement was also played for the jury. Allen argued that Investigator Mark Dobbins’ comments during the interview, such as victims who provide many details aren’t lying, vouched for the child.

But Superior Court Judge Daniel J. Craig agreed with the prosecutor that the defense could not now claim the recording created a reversible error because no specific objection was made before the recording was played for the jury.

Comments (2)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
nocnoc
30764
Points
nocnoc 03/20/13 - 08:46 am
1
0

Our typical Legal system at work

I seemed to of missed the statement where he "claimed" he was innocent in the article.

The whole motion is about legal technicalities, not NEW evidence or proof he did not commit the the crime.

Given the immediate public hate-rid of child molesters why do lawyers even ask for a jury trial?

Regina Phalange
42
Points
Regina Phalange 03/20/13 - 10:12 am
0
0

"The media and pop culture

Unpublished

"The media and pop culture does not dictate a rape victim's reactions or impact how fast they recover. "

Because no matter how bad the crime you are accused is you still deserve a fair trial with a jury of your peers.

Are suggesting we just go ahead an lynch anyone because of an accusation of child abuse? Who needs trials right? Lynch mobs are definitely the voices of reason.

lifelongresident
1311
Points
lifelongresident 03/20/13 - 04:30 pm
0
0

because its easier to create

Unpublished

because its easier to create doubt in at least of the juror's mind (than it is in the mind or opinion of the judge) in order to get a mistrial or hung jury...

thetruth1970
2
Points
thetruth1970 03/23/13 - 11:42 am
0
0

what's worse?

What's worse? a child molester or the lawyer trying to get him out on a technicality?

Back to Top

Loading...