Education

More News | |

Georgia wins round in legal battle over GRU name

Wednesday, March 6, 2013 4:54 PM
Last updated 9:07 PM
  • Follow Crime & courts

Georgia has fended off a legal move that would have stripped the state of a major defense in a copyright lawsuit that challenges the name of the merged universities in Augusta – Georgia Regents University.

Regent University in Virginia has sued the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia over the name.

U.S. District Court Judge J. Randal Hall issued an order Tuesday that denied the Virginia university’s attempt to prevent Georgia from asserting a government’s right to sovereign immunity.

The U.S. Constitution prohibits federal lawsuits against state governmental entities under most circumstances.

There are a few exceptions, including a legal precedent that says sovereign immunity cannot shield a government if there is a continual violation of federal law; in this case, copyright infringement.

The Virginia university filed suit Sept. 20 contending the Board of Regents’ chosen name for the merger of Augusta State University and Georgia Health Sciences University violated its copyright on the name “Regent University.”

The Board of Regents first voted on the new name Aug. 7 and gave final approval Jan. 7.

In the order issued Tuesday, Hall wrote that federal law disfavors any motion to prevent a defendant in a civil case from using whatever defensive argument it chooses, unless it is clearly worthless.

Although the legal precedent the Virginia university invokes can break sovereign immunity, appellate court rulings complicate the issue. The federal appeals court for Georgia has issued opinions that set different standards for determining how to connect a governmental entity to a specific act.

The attorneys representing Georgia contend the Virginia university cannot win on the motion because it cannot prove the Board of Regents is clearly responsible for the alleged copyright infringement.

Hall agreed with Georgia’s argument, and he declined to strike Georgia’s sovereign immunity defense at this time.

The lawsuit remains open, however.

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Fiat_Lux
15429
Points
Fiat_Lux 03/06/13 - 06:40 pm
1
0
Hopefully,

another judge will see it more accurately with better light.

"The attorneys representing Georgia contend the Virginia university cannot win on the motion because it cannot prove the Board of Regents is clearly responsible for the alleged copyright infringement."

Why in the world does this even have to be proven? Who else could or would have been responsible for doing it?

Dixieman
14972
Points
Dixieman 03/07/13 - 12:44 am
4
0
DIXIEMAN HAS 2 MILLION POINTS...

...but if each point is worth a dollar they will soon disappear down the maw of this taxpayer-funded lawsuit, Yes, folks, my taxes and yours are paying for the lawyers Georgia has hired to defend this suit and keep GRU as the name. Well, I don't like it. My vote is cave in and let the Virginia school have its way, no more litigation expense and then we will have to go back to ASU.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Vogtle workers see both reactor projects

Some veterans of the nuclear industry were at the site south of Augusta to see the complex network of rebar and concrete rising out of the ground in the 1970s and ’80s. Now, they are back.
Search Augusta jobs