Crime & Courts

Richmond Co. | Columbia Co. | Aiken Co. |

Bond denied for 2 accused in tax fraud scheme

Judge upset at contact among defendants

Monday, Feb. 25, 2013 2:20 PM
Last updated Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013 1:26 AM
  • Follow Crime & courts

Two defendants accused of taking part in a million-dollar tax fraud scheme must remain in custody pending trial, a judge has determined.

In an order filed Friday, U.S. Magistrate Court Judge W. Leon Barfield said there was no way to protect the community or prevent obstruction of justice unless An­gela Wil­lingham and Mat­thew Har­rington were denied bond.

They are among 12 defendants named in a 145-count federal indictment. All of the defendants – who include Har­ring­ton’s children, sisters and a nephew – have pleaded not guilty to conspiracy, tax fraud and aggravated identity theft.

According to court records and earlier hearings in federal court in Augusta, Wil­lingham is accused of leading a scheme that stole about $1.3 million by filing false income tax returns for people whose identities were stolen.

Willingham’s sisters, Ja­nice Smalley and Patrice Ro­ber­son, are accused of using their positions at Georgia Regents Medical Center and the Gracewood State Hos­pi­tal campus in Au­gusta to steal patients’ personal information.

According to the indictment, the information was funneled to Willingham and used to create phony income tax return forms that claimed Georgia Lottery winnings and large tax withholding from them.

The tax return checks were deposited into bank accounts opened by the defendants, the indictment says.

Willingham and the others continued the scheme even after it became obvious federal agents were investigating them, the judge wrote.

Willingham and Harring­ton are accused of destroying evidence, and Willingham is accused of trying to obstruct the investigation by encouraging a co-defendant to lie to investigators.

According to Barfield’s order, even after all the defendants were warned in court and by pretrial services officers that they could not contact each other, Smalley visited Willingham and Har­ring­ton in jail. Wil­ling­ham’s ex-husband, Bryan Gus­tave, also visited Har­ring­ton in violation of his probation officer’s instructions. Gustave and Willingham were convicted in a drug conspiracy in 1998.

The judge wrote that he “must conclude that neither An­gela Wil­lingham nor Mat­thew Har­rington are amendable to the traditional judicial restraints placed on the conduct of those accused and convicted of crime.”

A trial date has not been set.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Little Lamb
43808
Points
Little Lamb 02/25/13 - 03:33 pm
3
1
Prejudice

Judge W. Leon Barfield wrote in his order:

“Both have served lengthy prison sentences for narcotics and yet, both continued violating the law ...”

I thought we had a judicial system where the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The judge’s order denying bond looks like he has already judged them to be guilty.

MarinerMan
2107
Points
MarinerMan 02/25/13 - 04:52 pm
1
1
I Can't Really Agree This Time
Unpublished

Because they could still have access to funds, they are both flight risks. I've got to agree with Judge Barfield this time.

SCRebel
10
Points
SCRebel 02/25/13 - 04:58 pm
1
1
Not Prejudice...fact

The following paragraph you omitted is what the judge is refering to regarding violating the law (no contact orders), not the tax fraud case pending.

"According to Barfield’s order, even after all the defendants were warned by the judge in court and later by pretrial services officers that they could not have any contact with each other, Smalley visited both Willingham and Harrington in jail. Willingham’s ex-husband, Bryan Gustave, also visited Harrington in violation of his probation officer’s instructions. Gustave and Willingham were convicted in the same drug conspiracy in 1998.

“(Barfield) must conclude that neither Angela Willingham nor Matthew Harrington are amendable to the traditional judicial restraints placed on the conduct of those accused and convicted of crime.

rmwhitley
5526
Points
rmwhitley 02/25/13 - 05:03 pm
1
0
lefties
Unpublished

will defend lefties until death.

Jake
31605
Points
Jake 02/25/13 - 05:09 pm
5
0
Wrong profession

Now if these people were optometrists then they could go to Florida on vacation.

palmetto1008
9782
Points
palmetto1008 02/25/13 - 06:49 pm
5
0
Outstanding observation,
Unpublished

Outstanding observation, Jake. I'm kicking myself that I didn't think of it. Hats off to you!!

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs