Crime & Courts

Richmond Co. | Columbia Co. | Aiken Co. |

SC court reconsiders sex offender monitoring

Tuesday, Sept. 18, 2012 2:17 PM
Last updated 8:11 PM
  • Follow Crime & courts

COLUMBIA — Even after hearing the case a second time, the South Carolina Supreme Court isn’t sure it is fair to make some sex offenders in the state face lifetime satellite monitoring of their every move without any chance of appeal.



The justices Tuesday reheard a case from May where they decided the monitoring may be too harsh in some cases. The Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services asked the court to reconsider its ruling, saying their decision rewrote the law.

A lawyer for Jennifer Dykes again argued her constitutional rights were violated because she had no chance to appeal or revisit the decision to put a bracelet on her ankle that reports her every move to state authorities.

Dykes, 32, was ruled to be a sex offender after being convicted of a lewd act on a child charge stemming from her relationship with a 14-year-old girl in Greenville County several years ago. She was found to be at low risk to abuse a child again.

After violating her probation by drinking alcohol, continuing a relationship with a convicted felon she met while behind bars and rescheduling too many appointments for sex offender counseling, Dykes’ probation was revoked, according to court documents.

The probation violation meant under state law authorities could seek lifetime monitoring for Dykes without a chance of appeal. That kind of monitoring can be done for just two crimes — lewd act and first-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor. Most other crimes that land someone on the sex offender registry give an offender a chance to appeal after 10 years.

Dykes’ lawyer, Chris Scalzo, held up his wedding ring and said while he loves his wife and wears it nearly all the time, he can take it off.

“She’s not allowed to take that thing off her body unless there is a court order,” Scalzo said.

An attorney for the probation agency, John Aplin, said lawmakers passed the lifetime monitoring law to protect the public.

“The reason you are tracking that person every minute of every day for the rest of their life is to protect children from further future harm. It’s also to help law enforcement solve crimes,” Aplin said.

Chief Justice Jean Toal said she understands the need for public safety from the most dangerous offenders. But she said it is a fair question to ask if a one-size-fits-all law that doesn’t allow a timely chance to appeal the ruling or ask a judge to revisit whether an offender is still dangerous is constitutional.

“This court has no grief for sex offenders. But there are certainly different levels,” Toal said.

Associate Justice Kay Hearn, who wrote her own opinion in May suggesting that revealing every detail of Dykes’ private life to state officials violates her constitutional rights, pointed out that Dykes was not considered to be a dangerous sex offender who preys on children and would likely never change her behavior.

“This was, what, an 18-month relationship she had with an underage person,” Hearn said. “Clearly wrong, clearly illegal. But there was no predatory nature.”

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
CobaltGeorge
164336
Points
CobaltGeorge 09/18/12 - 02:36 pm
0
1
Yep

As the world of Bleeding Hearts and Liberal Turn!

my.voice
4914
Points
my.voice 09/18/12 - 04:10 pm
1
0
Are you kidding me? Her

Are you kidding me? Her rights were violated? This attorney must be one honorable guy. How can he even argue that without vomiting?

eagle
94
Points
eagle 09/18/12 - 04:38 pm
0
1
Sounds like she's just a
Unpublished

Sounds like she's just a screw-up. Hope they make her keep the bracelet on.

shrimp for breakfast
5460
Points
shrimp for breakfast 09/19/12 - 02:41 pm
0
0
my voice

That's funny. I laughed out loud!

Back to Top

Top headlines

Azziz UNLV president finalist

Ricardo Azziz, who has been mentioned in the past for other open university positions in Florida and Texas, is one of three finalists for the position.
Search Augusta jobs