Government

More News | | | Editor

Taxpayers likely to pay more for crime defense

  • Follow Crime & courts

ATLANTA -- Whoever said "crime doesn't pay" wasn't a taxpayer because the price of defending poor suspects is about to ratchet up another notch.



Taxpayers already pay the police, judges, prosecutors and public defenders assigned to defendants too poor to hire their own lawyers. Now, there is a movement to require taxpayers to also begin supplying lawyers for appeals.

The Georgia Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that everyone convicted has a right to appeal on the grounds that the trial attorney was ineffective.

Last week, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Jerry Baxter validated the class-action status of a group of inmates who argued that the government is required to promptly provide them with an attorney for their appeal who will argue the trial attorney was indeed ineffective. And if the original attorney came from a public defenders' office, the appeal attorney would have to be a private lawyer who didn't have the inherent conflict of interest by working in the same office as a public defender.

"For one, an indigent defendant cannot be penalized for exercising the right to conflict-free counsel," Baxter wrote in his ruling. "Memories fade, and witnesses move away. An indigent defendant would be placed at a material disadvantage if he were forced to wait months or years before an appellate lawyer could begin investigating the grounds for the indigent defendant's motion for new trial or appeal."

WHEN THE SOUTHERN Center for Human Rights filed the suit, almost 200 people were waiting for a new lawyer to file their appeals. One of the named plaintiffs had been waiting almost a year.

These new rounds of appeals are a predictable consequence from years of the state underfunding public defenders when these people were originally tried, said Gerry Weber, senior attorney for the Southern Center and a former veteran with the American Civil Liberties Union.

But funding for poor defendants has roughly doubled in 10 years, from $54 million to $111 million, when state and local funds are included. The state has been paying a growing share, from less than 10 percent in 2000 to 37 percent this year.

The Legislative Overnight Committee that scrutinized the operations of the Georgia Public Defenders Standards Council minced no words in its annual report issued Wednesday, the day of Baxter's order.

"Recent court developments and State Bar of Georgia actions likely have destroyed Georgia's ability to provide and fund a comprehensive public defenders' system," the report said.

It blamed "ideological crusaders who consistently work to hijack and manipulate the system" with trying to break the bank.

The lawyers blame the state's get-tough stance with such severe, mandatory penalties for even nonviolent crimes that defendants feel compelled to use every means to fight for their freedom rather than taking their lumps with a form of punishment that doesn't include imprisonment.

THE STATE BAR of Georgia is in the process of approving an advisory opinion -- essentially a rule for all lawyers -- that would make it unethical for public defenders working in the same office to defend conflicted cases. Traditionally, public defenders have established what lawyers call a Chinese Wall between them so that no information about conflicted cases passes between them, but that opinion would say that would no longer suffice.

With only so many public defender offices, the result of the opinion is a rise in private attorneys hired at greater costs.

In the 10 weeks before the opinion was proposed, 182 conflict cases were declared by public defenders in the four judicial circuits with the most conflict cases. In the 10 weeks after the opinion was proposed, the number in those circuits soared to 585.

Last week, the director of the Public Defenders Standards Council, Mack Crawford, told legislative budget writers to prepare for more expense beyond what's allocated.

"I expect if the State Bar opinion holds, you're going to see a tremendous (amount) more than $4 million having to be spent," he said. "I don't know of any system we could put in place to do away with the $4 million."

Unhappy lawmakers

As legislators are cutting education, furloughing troopers and reducing funds for welfare programs, they're unhappy about being asked to spend more on lawyers.

"This bar opinion will be coming from the same people who don't think we're adequately funding enough to move cases through the system so that we come forward with an opinion that will lend folks appeal rights that I can't afford as a private citizen," said Rep. Chuck Martin, R-Alpharetta.

He's not a lawyer, but he is chairman of the Public Safety Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee that sets the budget for indigent defense.

And if the original lawyer was proven to be no good, can taxpayers get a refund? "Why would we have to pay somebody for ineffective counsel?" he asked.

-- Morris News Service

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Riverman1
90160
Points
Riverman1 03/01/10 - 05:24 am
0
0
The State Public Defenders

The State Public Defenders are overworked and this ruling only serves to slow them down even more. If the public defenders are attacked in the courts, you are going to find few willing to do this thankless task for low pay. They will all go private and the state is going to have to come up with big, big money to pay them the going rates.

justus4
109
Points
justus4 03/01/10 - 06:21 am
0
0
Ha! Democracy ain't easy,
Unpublished

Ha! Democracy ain't easy, otherwise all nations would do it. This move to increase the number of "private lawyers" to do work as Public Defenders will fatten some lawyers pockets, because the entire system is rigged to fill the prisons. However, some brilliant individuals will soon recommend that instead of giving SOME suspects a so-called trial, they should be go work somewhere like the Chains Gang and skip the court stuff altogether. And are all these people getting a "fair" trial according to the Constitution? Probably not....but saying it is free speech.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Disc golf tournament benefits Augusta charity

APPLING — When Paul Childs runs a disc golf tournament, he wants it to mean something for the rest of the community. Childs he found a cause worth supporting: the Ronald McDonald House Charities.
Search Augusta jobs