Government

More News | | | Editor

Ag commissioner to fight fed regulations

Thursday, Feb. 6, 2014 7:53 AM
Last updated 6:18 PM
  • Follow Business

ATLANTA -- Agriculture Commissioner Gary Black pledged to a farm group Wednesday to fight implementation of proposed federal food-safety regulations that he said would cripple Georgia’s produce industry.

“If we allow this to stand on produce, they’ll come back for peanuts and a number of businesses,” he said. “The sky will be the limit if we allow this to stand.”

The draft regulations from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are designed to implement new safeguards enacted by Congress three years ago in the Food Safety Modernization Act. They come in the wake of numerous outbreaks traced to food-borne illness.

The FDA estimates 48 million Americans suffer from some form of food poisoning, with 100,000 hospitalized and thousands killed. Fresh produce is a focus because food processors and restaurants are already regularly inspected, but salads and fruits eaten raw don’t subject pathogens to sterilizing heat.

Black’s concern is that the rigorous new precautions will be onerous and expensive.

“If you don’t like what they’re doing to healthcare, wait until they get hold of food,” he said.

Agriculture is Georgia’s largest economic segment, responsible for nearly 400,000 jobs and a $77 billion impact. To protect it, Black pledged to the Georgia Agribusiness Council he headed before his election that he would keep the state out front of efforts to modify the regulations.

The FDA has extended the public-comment period and will issue a revised proposal next year. Black, though, lamented that few of his colleagues in other states showed similar outrage at a meeting last week.

“If we have to lead from our industry here and our congressional delegation here, then by gum, that’s what we’ll do,” he said.

The biggest concern Georgia farmers have, according to Agribusiness Council President Bryan Tolar, is that compliance will leave them unable to compete with cheaper imports that don’t have to meet the same safety standards.

“We’re all about food safety. It’s not about trying to get around those responsibilities,” he said. “What we want is an even playing field.”

Comments (1) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
fedex227
10316
Points
fedex227 02/06/14 - 07:46 pm
0
0
Really? That's the argumemt?

"compliance will leave (us) unable to compete with cheaper imports that don’t have to meet the same safety standards."
'If import companies can sell Americans unsafe crap why can't we???'

How about lobbying and putting the effort into requiring that import companies meet the same safety standards as those imposed on domestic companies (if it's really true that a double standard exists).

Back to Top

Loading...