Birth control methods have wide price range

  • Follow Business

WASHINGTON — Birth control that you must take every single day? A more goof-proof option that costs a lot up front but then works for several years? Or something in between?

A woman’s choice might come down to her wallet: The price of birth control varies dramatically.

Just the pill has a huge range, from $9 a month for generics to $90 a month for some of the newest brands, plus a yearly doctor’s visit for the prescription.

A once-a-month option? The patch or ring could run you $55 monthly.

Even more reliable are so-called long-acting types, those IUDs or implants that can last years but can cost $600 to nearly $1,000 for the doctor to insert.

That’s if you don’t have insurance that covers at least some of the tab – although many women do. And if those prices are too much, crowded public clinics offer free or reduced-price options.

QUESTIONS ABOUT COST and access to birth control have been swirling for weeks now, intensifying after a Georgetown University law school student testified before congressional Democrats in support of a new federal policy to pay for contraception that she said can add up to $1,000 a year, not covered by the Jesuit college’s health plan. Talk show host Rush Limbaugh’s verbal assault on her comments became the latest skirmish in the birth control wars.

Soon, the new policy will make contraceptives available free of charge as preventive care, just like mammograms, for women with most employer-provided health insurance. Churches are exempt. For other religious-affiliated organizations, such as colleges and hospitals, their insurance companies would have to pay for the coverage, something that has triggered bitter political debate.

A major study of nearly 10,000 women that’s under way in St. Louis provides a tantalizing clue about what might happen when that policy takes effect.

Consider: Nearly half of the nation’s 6 million-plus pregnancies each year are unintended. Rates of unplanned pregnancies are far higher among low-income women than their wealthier counterparts. Among the reasons is that condoms can fail. So can birth control pills, if the woman forgets to take them every day or can’t afford a refill.

Only about 5 percent of U.S. women use the most effective contraceptives – a matchstick-size implant named Implanon or intrauterine devices known as IUDs. Once inserted, they prevent pregnancy for three, five or 10 years. Dr. Jeffrey Peipert, of Washington University in St. Louis, says many women turn them down because of a higher up-front cost that insurance hasn’t always covered – even though years of pills can cost as much.

“How can we cover Viagra and not IUDs?” said Peipert, who is leading the new study.

Called the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, the study is providing those options and a range of others for free.

About 75 percent of women in the ongoing study are choosing the IUD or the implant, Peipert says. After the first year, more than 80 percent of the women who chose the long-acting contraceptives are sticking with them, compared with about half the pill users, he says.

THERE ARE SOME options for more affordable contraception, such as pub­lic clinics or Planned Parent­hood.

About 55 percent of local health departments offer some family planning services, according to the National Association of County & City Health Officials. Many of those receive federal Title X funding, which means they can offer contraception on a sliding fee scale. The poorest women may get it free, while others may pay full price or somewhere in between.

There are cheaper generic pills. Peipert says there’s little difference between them and pricey new brand-name versions such as Yaz.

Some women go through a number of brands before finding one that doesn’t cause uncomfortable side effects, says Sarah Brown, of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.

Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
seenitB4 03/10/12 - 06:11 am
The article sez... “How can

The article sez...

“How can we cover Viagra and not IUDs?” said Peipert, who is leading the new study.

The answer is..We have more men running the country than women.

seenitB4 03/10/12 - 06:15 am

We have billions of people here now......if we don't have birth control we soon won't have a world to live in won't happen in my lifetime but it will happen.

ConcernedTaxpayer 03/10/12 - 09:40 am
I hate to see government

I hate to see government getting involved and forcing anything on people of companies, but it seems it would be less expensive for insurance companies to pay for birth control than to pay for a pregnant woman's Dr. visits and the subsequent birth and then the pediatrics bills for the child.

Bruno 03/10/12 - 10:57 am
Contraception is available at

Contraception is available at little to no cost virtually everywhere in the US. The idea that it isn't or that it costs, as Ms. Fluke put it, around $1000 a year is a myth.

Yes, it can cost in that range but that doesn't mean it does.

museofsatie 03/10/12 - 09:28 pm
The birth control I'm

The birth control I'm currently using (Mirena) cost about $700, including the doctor's fee. It'll last for five years, and that cost covered the insertion procedure and will also cover the extraction procedure.

I don't know exactly how much my two pregnancies cost overall, but I'd estimate to around $16000 for the first (some complications) and around $14000 for the second. It seems really silly to me that insurance companies would have an issue with covering birth control when it'd save them a LOT of money.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs