Oldest, youngest drivers most at risk

  • Follow Business

It should be no surprise that older drivers have higher rates of fatal crashes, based on miles driven, than any other group except young drivers, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The high death rate is due in large part to their frailty. Older people are less likely to survive an injury than younger people.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, (www.nhtsa. dot.gov), 32.2 million licensed drivers were age 65 or older in the United States in 2008 (latest data available). NHTSA says 5,533 people age 65 or older were killed in traffic crashes in 2009. This represents 16 percent of all Americans killed on the road. In addition, 187,000 older individuals were injured in traffic crashes in 2009.

There is a growing need to help older drivers sharpen their skills as well as recognize their changing abilities and adapt their driving practices appropriately. Insurers have joined with state and local governments, and groups such as AARP, to create programs designed to address these needs. In addition, more states are attempting to identify, assess and regulate older drivers with diminishing abilities who cannot or will not voluntarily modify their driving habits.

Recently, at least two insurers have adopted computer-based training programs for older drivers that are designed to improve drivers' useful field of vision -- the visual area over which information can be extracted at a single glance. Studies have shown that drivers who have a limited useful field of vision are twice as likely to experience a crash. Although the range of the useful field of vision declines with age, research shows that it can be improved with brain training. In fact, specific training lasting only 10 hours has produced impressive reductions in driving risk and crashes, according to the Insurance Information Institute.

Why are motor vehicle crashes the leading cause of death among 15- to 20-year olds? Immaturity and lack of driving experience are the two main factors leading to the high crash rate among teens.

Teens' lack of experience affects their recognition of and response to hazardous situations and results in dangerous practices such as speeding and tailgating.

Other major contributing factors to the higher crash risk of young drivers are night driving and teen passengers. Teenagers are involved in more motor vehicle crashes late in the day and at night than at other times of the day. Teens also have a greater chance of getting involved in an accident if other teens are present in the vehicle.

Graduated drivers license (GDL) laws, which include a three-phase program that allows teen drivers to develop more mature driving attitudes and gain experience behind the wheel, have been successful in reducing teen motor vehicle accidents. Since 1996, when Florida became the first state to enact a GDL law, most states have enacted such laws, but provisions vary. 

States have their responsibilities regarding young drivers, as do parents. Peers are often involved in crashes but they, too, should have a stronger role on the side of responsibility instead of complicity.

Drivers ages 15 to 20 accounted for 11 percent of all drivers involved in fatal crashes in 2009 and 14 percent of all drivers involved in police-reported crashes. The number of drivers ages 15 to 20 involved in fatal crashes totaled 5,148 in 2009, down 37 percent from the 8,224 involved in 2000.

Thirty-three percent of drivers ages 15 to 20 who were killed in motor vehicle crashes in 2009 had been drinking some amount of alcohol; 28 percent were alcohol-impaired, which is defined by a blood alcohol content of 0.08 grams per deciliter or higher.

In 2006 (latest data available) crashes involving 15- to 17-year olds cost more than $34 billion nationwide in medical treatment, property damage and other costs, according to an AAA analysis.

Both the young and old are vulnerable for different reasons, but traffic crashes that could be prevented continue to affect virtually all drivers.


Comments (7) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Craig Spinks
Craig Spinks 07/31/11 - 03:37 am
What is the e-mail address

What is the e-mail address for the Columbia County Juvenile Court?

Asitisinaug 08/01/11 - 06:32 pm


Raise the driving age to at least a senior in high school with A/B average or 18 years of age.

Require drivers tests for those who reach the age of social security on a year or every other year basis.

Reduce the length of drivers licenses which can now be up to 30 years.

KSL 08/01/11 - 07:24 pm
I'm approaching social

I'm approaching social security age rapidly. I don't know that I would have strong objections to being singled our for being tested for competency. Don't know that it should be every year or two.

However, I disagree with an across the board raising of the driving age for teenagers. As for the testing the competency of senior citizens, consider that there are differing levels of maturity and responsibilty in teenagers.

Asitisinaug 08/02/11 - 02:08 pm
KSL, just thoughts....I will

KSL, just thoughts....I will be there myself one day as well but from seeing my grandparents and many others who still think they can drive when it is obvious they can't, it is like arguing with a drunk who wishes to drive even though a sober person is there. I don't know an exact age and it will be different for everyone but somewhere around retirement, you should be required to show that you are aware of the current laws and that you are a safe and knowledgeable driver. Actually, you should probably have to do that every 4-6 years anyway throughout your life.

As for the younger drivers why do you disagree that it is time to review raising the driving age - more cars on the crowded roadways, use of cell phones, ipods, texting and the many newly created distractions over the years should warrant a review of driving ages, etc.

I know it would be inconvenient for many parents but we should at least be requiring driving school combined with good grades and becoming a future productive member of society with this privilege since everything else now seems to be a right...lol.

BTW, I would not be thrilled taking any new tests either but in just about everything else we do in life continuing education combined with training and testing is required. It would only seem logical to apply to something as dangerous as driving which results in so many injuries and deaths each year.

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs
Top headlines
Augusta VA supervisor sentenced to prison
In what the judge called a "tragic case," a former Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center supervisor was sentenced Thursday to 27 months in federal prison for making false statements in medical files.