Georgia Court of Appeals halts 2nd scheduled Ga. execution

Judges wanting doctors' claims to be reviewed

  • Follow News

ATLANTA — A federal appeals court gave a Georgia death row inmate a temporary last-minute reprieve because doctors changed their minds and now believe he’s mentally disabled, but his legal battle to avoid lethal injection could be an uphill climb.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday issued a stay less than an hour before Warren Lee Hill was set to die.

In a 2-1 decision, the judges said more review of the doctors’ statements was needed. Still, Hill faces strict requirements to get his case reconsidered.

“If this were easy, it would have been picked off months ago and not at 6:30 (Tuesday) night,” said Richard Dieter, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center. “The fact that it was so late, I think, means that it’s going to be a hard fight. But the 11th Circuit said at least there’s some way that he could still prevail.”

Hill was one of two Georgia inmates scheduled to die this week. The planned execution of Andrew Cook today was also halted.

Lawyers for both Cook and Hill argued in filings before the Georgia Court of Appeals that the state would violate the law by using pentobarbital in executions without a prescription. The government called the claim frivolous and challenged both rulings.

Prosecutors also asked the U.S. Supreme Court to vacate the 11th Circuit’s order halting Hill’s execution on the mental disability claim.

Hill was sentenced to die for the 1990 beating death of fellow inmate Joseph Handspike. Hill used a board studded with nails and bludgeoned Handspike while he slept, authorities said. At the time, Hill was already serving a life sentence for the 1986 slaying of his girlfriend, Myra Wright, who was shot 11 times.

The dissenting opinion from the 11th Circuit illustrates why the fight could be difficult for Hill.

Circuit Judge Frank Hull said Hill has already brought up his claim in federal court and can’t do so again.

The judge also faulted Hill’s lawyers for waiting until the last minute to bring up the new evidence even though one of the doctors approached them to say he wanted to reconsider the case in July.

Georgia passed a law in 1988 prohibiting the execution of mentally disabled death row inmates, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that the execution of mentally disabled offenders was unconstitutional. But Georgia also has the strictest-in-the-nation standard for death row inmates seeking to avoid execution, requiring them to prove their mental disability beyond a reasonable doubt.

Most states that impose the death penalty have a lower threshold, while some don’t set standards at all.

Hill’s lawyers have long claimed he’s mentally disabled and therefore shouldn’t be executed.

Last week they released new sworn statements from the three doctors who examined Hill in 2000 and previously testified he was not mentally disabled.

In their new statements, the doctors wrote they were rushed in their evaluation at the time, they had acquired additional experience and there had been scientific developments in the intervening 12 years. All three wrote they now believe Hill is mentally disabled.

“In other words, all of the experts – both the state’s and the petitioner’s – now appear to be in agreement that Hill is in fact mentally retarded,” the 11th Circuit judges in the majority wrote.

The state questioned the doctors’ credibility, saying they hadn’t seen Hill in person since 2000. The government also cited IQ tests and argued that family members described him as “the leader of the family” and “a father figure” before his trial. He was not in special education classes and served in the Navy, where he received promotions, the state argued.

The 11th Circuit set a period of up to 30 days for the two sides to spell out their arguments.

Dieter said Hill has new evidence, but he’s not contending that it proves his innocence, but rather that he’s mentally disabled.

“If you can prove that you’re in a class that the Supreme Court has excluded from the death penalty, it’s like proving your innocence,” Dieter said. “I think one thing DNA and all the innocence cases have taught us is that sometimes there just is new evidence that ought to trump procedural bars.”

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
mosovich
768
Points
mosovich 02/21/13 - 09:29 am
2
1
Absolutely insane..

What's mentally ill is our justice system.. His victoms weren't tested to see if they were mentally ill before he killed them.. Get on with it.. To much time and energy is wasted here.. They were sentenced to die, go ahead and do it. A friend of mine from schools family has been waiting on the killer of his brother to be executed now for 17 years!!! Yes, 17 years of appeal after appeal.. It's the emotional toll on these families who there criminal killed that is so unfair. The killer didn't give his brother a chance yet the killer keeps getting chance after chance on appeal.. This is what's wrong with our justice system..

rmwhitley
5542
Points
rmwhitley 02/21/13 - 10:23 am
0
0
hill is due
Unpublished

3 more mulligans. Set him free, elect him as a liberal senator or representative, send him to washington d.c. Maybe he'll continue his good work on "the Hill".

dichotomy
32177
Points
dichotomy 02/21/13 - 10:46 am
1
2
I know this is not a popular

I know this is not a popular opinion.....but......I think when the mentally ill kill innocent people they are EXACTLY the ones we need to execute and get them off the books. I don't care if they knew what they were doing or not...the only salient point is that they murdered people.

When "doctors" cannot agree on when someone IS mentally ill, they certainly will never agree as to when someone is CURED and can be let back out on the streets again. It's all a sham game they play with OUR lives. They put these people in an institution for a few months or a couple of years and then pronounce them miraculously cured and turn them loose to kill again.

And then there is the fact that this guy is no more mentally ill than most of the people out here walking the streets.

The only sanity I question here is the sanity of our judges.

Red Headed Step Child
4027
Points
Red Headed Step Child 02/21/13 - 01:08 pm
0
0
Pentobarbital

So...get a prescription!!! How hard can it be? I would imagine that death by pentobarbital is a MUCH better way to go than say, getting shot 11 times or being bludgeoned with a board studded with nails.... sheesh.

jimmymac
37346
Points
jimmymac 02/21/13 - 01:51 pm
0
0
punishment
Unpublished

It's sad that our judicial system is only concerned with the rights of the crininal and totally ignore the victims and their families. What difference does it make if this person is mentally impaired? They function just fine until it's time to meet their day of justice and then all of a sudden they're mentally deficient. They should give him the needle and his lawer along with him. One appeal and then it's goodbye!

itsanotherday1
42282
Points
itsanotherday1 02/21/13 - 06:08 pm
0
0
I think where I draw the line

I think where I draw the line on mental illness is "do they know right from wrong?" If they in any way tried to cover up, hide or deceive about their crime, they are sane enough to take the punishment.

Back to Top

Top headlines

UGA jumps up in 2 polls

The University of Georgia made the second-biggest jump of all the teams in the two national ranking polls, both of which were released Tuesday.
Search Augusta jobs