WASHINGTON — Air traffic controllers’ work schedules often lead to chronic fatigue, making them less alert and endangering the safety of the national air traffic system, according to a study the government kept secret for years.
Federal Aviation Administration officials posted the study online Monday, hours after The Associated Press reported the findings and noted that agency officials had declined to furnish a copy despite repeated requests over the past three months, including a Freedom of Information Act filing.
The AP obtained a draft of the final report dated Dec. 1, 2011. The report the FAA posted online was dated December 2012, although the findings appear to be nearly identical to the draft.
The impetus for the study was a recommendation by the National Transportation Safety Board to the FAA and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association to revise controller schedules to provide rest periods that are long enough “to obtain sufficient restorative sleep.”
The study found that nearly 2 in 10 controllers had committed significant errors in the previous year – such as bringing planes too close together – and more than half attributed the errors to fatigue. A third of controllers said they perceived fatigue to be a “high” or “extreme” safety risk. More than 6 in 10 controllers indicated that in the previous year they had fallen asleep or experienced a lapse of attention while driving to or from midnight shifts, which typically begin about 10 p.m. and end around 6 a.m.
Overall, controllers whose activity was closely monitored by scientists averaged 5.8 hours of sleep per day over the course of a work week. They averaged only 3.1 hours before midnight shifts and 5.4 hours before early morning shifts.
The most tiring schedules required controllers to work five consecutive midnight shifts, or to work six days a week several weeks in a row, often with at least one midnight shift per week. .
The study used a survey of 3,268 controllers asked about their work schedules and sleep habits, and a field study that monitored the sleep and mental alertness of more than 200 controllers at 30 air traffic facilities.
NASA produced the study at the FAA’s request.
In the field study, researchers concentrated on controllers who worked a schedule known as the “rattler” in which controllers squeeze five eight-hour shifts into four 24-hour periods by cutting the turnaround time between shifts to as little as eight hours. Some controllers like the schedule because it gives them a three-day weekend.
Schedules worked by 76 percent of controllers in the field study led to chronic fatigue.
“Chronic fatigue may be considered to pose a significant risk to controller alertness, and hence to the safety of the ATC (air traffic control) system,” the study concluded, especially when combined with little stimulation during periods of low air traffic and the human body’s natural pressure to sleep during certain times of the day.
The study makes 17 recommendations to the FAA, including that the agency discontinue mandatory six-day schedules “as soon as possible.”
More than 30 percent of controllers who worked the six-day schedules said they had committed a significant error in the previous year. Three years later, controllers at several air traffic facilities told the AP that six-day work weeks are still common.
FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown said Monday that the agency now requires there be at least two controllers on duty after midnight and that controllers be provided at least nine hours between certain shifts to rest. Controllers are also permitted more time for “recuperative breaks” during shifts, workload permitting.
“Although fatigue is an issue in any 24/7 operation, the FAA has taken many positive steps to minimize fatigue,” Brown said. “The fatigue modeling we’ve done shows that there is greater alertness using these updated scheduling practices.”
But the transportation safety board told the FAA in 2013: “We are concerned that, given the realities of the time required for an employee to commute home and back to work, and to attend to personal and family needs, a nine-hour break may not allow enough time for an employee to obtain eight continuous hours of sleep.”
FAA officials also refused to share the report with researchers from the National Academies, which advises Congress on science issues, and didn’t provide a copy to the NTSB even though the safety board’s recommendations prompted the study.
The board’s recommendations were the result of a 2006 accident in which a regional airliner crashed while taking off from a runway that was too short in Lexington, Kentucky. Forty-nine of the 50 people on board were killed. The air traffic controller who cleared the plane for takeoff didn’t notice it turn onto the wrong runway. The controller had worked all night and had had only two hours sleep in the previous 24 hours.
NASA researchers completed the study draft several months after a series of incidents involving controllers falling asleep on the job embarrassed FAA officials and led to the resignation of the head of the agency’s air traffic organization. In one incident in 2011, two airliners landed at Washington’s Reagan National Airport late at night without assistance from the airport’s control tower where the lone controller on duty had fallen asleep.