Savannah River Site oversight board calls for broader scope in German waste assessment

Monday, July 14, 2014 6:14 PM
Last updated Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:47 AM
  • Follow Latest News

A federally appointed Savannah River Site oversight panel is challenging the environmental assessment being prepared for proposed shipments of German nuclear waste.

The assessment does not go far enough into analyzing potential delays to existing missions at the South Carolina site, the risks of terrorist attacks or the impact of long-term nuclear waste storage on citizens of Aiken and surrounding communities, according to the Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board.

Scientists at Savannah River National Laboratory have developed technology to dispose of highly-enriched uranium embedded inside one million graphite spheres – each about the size of a tennis ball. A German-funded assessment is being prepared to determine effects of shipping 455 storage casks filled with the spheres across the Atlantic Ocean to a Charleston, S.C. port.

Modifications to H-Canyon facilities at SRS would be used to remove 900 kilograms of highly enriched uranium from the spheres. Three disposition alternatives would involve the production of up to 100 vitrified logs at the site’s Defense Waste Processing Facility.

The SRS CAB, which has previously criticized foreign waste shipments to SRS, said the Department of Energy has not identified disposal locations for the German waste.

“Currently there is no Federal Repository for vitrified nuclear waste or other forms of highly radioactive waste, so it is important for the Department of Energy to include an analysis of the impact of long-term or permanent storage of such waste on both the Savannah River Site operations and local citizens,” the board wrote.

The board’s comments have been drafted but not finalized for submission. Public comments are due July 21.

The environmental assessment needs to include an analysis of delays to closing aging, high-level waste tanks and processing used nuclear fuel stored in L-Basin, since those missions use facilities that would be used to process the German fuel, the board wrote.

Additionally, the board called for looking at terrorist risks at each storage location for the waste throughout the disposition process.

The Department of Energy has said the German waste needs to be returned to the U.S. to keep it from falling into terrorist hands, but the board said without a risk assessment, it cannot “demonstrate to the public that the proposed project meets the stated purpose and need.”

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
flipa1
2755
Points
flipa1 07/15/14 - 05:32 pm
0
0
Keep us posted this is more important than it seems.

Keep us posted this is more important than it seems.

Riverman1
90613
Points
Riverman1 07/15/14 - 09:31 pm
0
0
Augusta Nuclear Waste Disposal

I can see the trucks on the streets around the Berlin facilities. Painted on the side will be Augusta Nuclear Waste Disposal, pick-up on Monday and Thursday.

Back to Top

Search Augusta jobs