Augusta Economy

More News | Fort Gordon | Plant Vogtle | Savannah River Site | Editor

Construction of MOX plant at SRS to continue through September

Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:20 PM
Last updated 7:20 PM
  • Follow Latest News

Construction of the mixed-oxide fuel fabrication facility will continue until at least through September without layoffs, according to the National Nuclear Security Administration.

On the same day the NNSA released a long-awaited analysis of alternative methods for plutonium disposition, the federal agency that manages the multibillion-dollar MOX program at Savannah River Site said construction could still be placed on standby when fiscal year 2015 begins Oct. 1.

“The NNSA intends to work with the contractor on a plan for placing the project in cold standby during (fiscal) 2015, and we are continuing our ongoing discussions with Congress as they review and evaluate the (fiscal) 2015 budget request,” according to a statement.

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina’s senior senator and a longtime supporter of the MOX program, applauded U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz for continuing construction through the end of the fiscal year, adding that he would fight for the future of the project.

“I thank the secretary for reversing course. This is the right decision for the program, the site and the employees working on the program at SRS,” Graham said. “In the short term, this decision will save thousands of jobs. However, there is still a long, arduous fight ahead.”

The MOX project is intended to convert 34 metric tons of U.S. weapons-grade plutonium into commercial reactor fuel and fulfill an international nonproliferation agreement with Russia. About $3.9 billion has been spent so far, and construction costs have reached an estimated $10 billion. In 1999, the MOX plant was projected to cost $1.7 billion.

The Department of Energy report released Tuesday analyzed the estimated life-cycle cost, schedule and ability to fulfill Russian agreements for five plutonium disposition methods, including the facility under construction at SRS.

The analysis determined that the contractor for the South Carolina MOX plant, Shaw Areva MOX Services, underestimated annual operating costs and issued change orders for several hundred million dollars. The life-cycle cost was an estimated $31 billion.

Options to the MOX plant include constructing a $50.5 billion fast-spectrum burner reactor and fuel fabrication facility at the K-Area Complex at SRS; immobilizing plutonium in glass canisters to dispose of in a geological repository for $28.7 billion; downblending plutonium for disposal in a salt-bed repository for $8.8 billion; and placing canisters of plutonium in 5,000-meter-deep shafts drilled into crystalline rock for an unknown cost.

The report also indicates that the four alternatives to the MOX plant at SRS would require further negotiations with Russia. Additionally, the SRS facility could complete disposition of 34 metric tons by 2043, the quickest of the options.

The NNSA said the report will be used “as a basis for determining the most efficient path forward for plutonium disposition.”

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
KSL
121840
Points
KSL 04/29/14 - 02:01 pm
2
1
First Yucca, now MOX. Obama

First Yucca, now MOX. Obama throws taxpayer money around that it grows on trees in all of the land grabbed national forests.

rmwhitley
5526
Points
rmwhitley 04/29/14 - 04:02 pm
0
0
U.S. democratic
Unpublished

senator, lindsey graham. How in the world can you conservative South Carolinians vote for this obama puppet? I'm ashamed to say I'm from S.C. when someone asks about that RINO.

GiantsAllDay
9063
Points
GiantsAllDay 04/29/14 - 07:11 pm
3
1
A bigger waste of money than

A bigger waste of money than Naval Fuels, In Tank Precipitation and the K Cooling Tower combined. But hey, as long as they throw the money at our neck of the woods, it's ok, right?

sawgrass
1233
Points
sawgrass 04/29/14 - 08:27 pm
2
2
GiantsAllDay

How can you make such a inane statement? The MOX project is not throwing money toward your "neck of the woods". You are probably a legacy employee who has never worked anywhere but SRS and has lived off of the government fat for years and years.
The MOX project is designed to rid our country of nuclear grade weapons plutonium in an agreement with Russia. The MOX project is the only viable option. Vitrification does not render the plutonium into a safe state. It can still be extracted and used to develop dirty bombs from our enemies.
The 31 billion dollar estimate for the life cycle of this program has never been published in any report. This is a dollar amount pulled out of the air.
Compare the MOX project to the other options. There is NO comparison.
The MOX project also generates revenue for our government. This has never happened at SRS.
Your comments appreciated.

GiantsAllDay
9063
Points
GiantsAllDay 04/29/14 - 11:20 pm
3
1
Legacy employee? You'd be

Legacy employee? You'd be surprised at where I've been and what I've done.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Stranger helps raise $40,000 for mom who left child in park

A thousand miles didn't stop a New Hampshire woman from extending a helping hand to a local mother accused of leaving her 9-year-old daughter at a park while she worked her shift at a fast-food ...
Search Augusta jobs