News |   Obits |   Sports |   Business |   Opinion |   Things to Do |   Life |   Blogs |   Photos |   Video |   Data |   Jobs |   Homes |   Autos |   Buy/Sell


Ga. coastal town drops windmill plan

Wednesday, Feb. 19, 2014 7:50 AM
Last updated 7:17 PM
  • Follow Latest News

TYBEE ISLAND, Ga. -- Tybee's turbine is gone with the wind.

  Morris News Sevice
Morris News Sevice

A new analysis of installing and operating a donated wind turbine on Tybee indicates it wouldn’t be as beneficial as first described.

Tybee council member Paul Wolff has removed the proposal from the Feb. 27 city council agenda.

“After digging a little deeper into the economics, the wind speed was lower and the offset power rate was lower,” said Wolff, who had championed the idea. “Had one remained constant it would still have been viable. Since both dropped it didn’t make economic sense to go forward.”

The turbine, an Endurance E-3120 model valued at $272,000, was offered to Tybee from an undisclosed corporate donor. Plans called for it be sited next to the water treatment plant on Tybee’s north end so it could directly power that facility, which is Tybee’s single biggest electric bill. Attached to a 120-foot monopole with its three blades’ sweep reaching a maximum height of 150 feet, the turbine is about as tall as the nearby cell tower, water tower and lighthouse.

Taking into account an estimated $134,000 in shipping and installation costs, initial estimates of the long-term benefits to Tybee valued the gift at about $400,000 over 20 years. But those numbers didn’t hold up to scrutiny.

Wolff had initially valued the electricity produced at 14 cents per killowatt hour based on the “low-end average” of the rates Tybee pays across its facilities. But for the water treatment plant, which operates around the clock, Tybee has a time-of-use agreement with Georgia Power that reduces its rate there to 7.52 cents per kilowatt hour.

“That’s a 46 percent reduction in avoided cost,” Wolff said.


Lowered wind estimates

And then there’s wind speed.

Consultants from Wind Turbines of South Carolina, which installs turbines, calculated average wind speed at 15.2 mph. That speed would generate about 200,000 kilowatt hours per year, Wolff said. However, their analysis factored in gusts, which a subsequent analysis by council member Bill Garbett removed. Garbett, who had researched the feasibility of wind turbines on Tybee several years ago when the issue was first raised for Memorial Park, said the consultants’ data looked wrong to him. He looked anew at the issue, gathering data from National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the NOAA weather station at Fort Pulaski and an anemometer located at the North Beach Parking Lot, and came up with a likely wind speed of 11.2 mph.

“Some have told me that this is an opportunity to showcase the potential of wind power in this region,” Garbett wrote in a report on his findings. “Unfortunately, the data shows just the opposite.”

The wind speed Garbett estimated sounds about right to Simon Mahan, renewable energy manager for the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, a nonprofit that advocates for wind energy.

“Take the best resources and if you cobble them together then 5 to 5.5 meters per second (11.2 to 12.3 mph) is a reasonable range for this hub height,” he said.

Pro bono analysis

While Garbett was researching wind speeds and Wolff was researching the electricity rate, Tybee native Charles Adkins volunteered his services to analyze the whole picture.

Adkins, who lives on Wilmington Island, is vice president of Ventyx LLC, which helps utility companies make decisions about building power plants.

He was skeptical when he first learned of the turbine.

“My first response was they’ll never be able to do that,” he said. “When I heard it was donated that changed my mind.”

He offered to do a more robust economic analysis free of charge, plugging in the new data as it became available. Even with the lower avoided cost on electricity, the deal looked doable at the original wind estimate.

“If the average wind speed is greater than 14 mph that unit would be able to justify itself on avoided costs to Georgia Power,” he said.

When the wind speed estimate dropped to 11.2 mph, Adkins factored in “soft benefits,” including the salvage value and federal production tax credits, but even that couldn’t make it worthwhile. In that scenario Tybee was looking at losing up to about $40,000 over the life of the project.

“The break even was too big,” Adkins said.

At odds over birds

Previously, the biggest obstacle to the turbine was a concern over threatened and endangered shore birds, including red knots and piping plovers. A Georgia Department of Natural Resources wildlife biologist weighed in against the turbine’s planned siting at a recent public meeting.

“If I look at the overall map of Tybee, this is the last place I’d put it,” Tim Keyes said at the Jan. 27 town hall meeting.

Just last week, however, the Coastal group of the Georgia Chapter of the Sierra Club recommended that Tybee not impede or delay the installation of the turbine because of concerns over birds.

Among the reasons they cite are the turbine’s relatively small size, its monopole construction and the fact that with one exception “available documentation shows that the birds of most concern, (red knots and, particularly, the piping plover), are rarely seen at this location, and when seen are present in very small numbers.”

Wolff said he still thinks the project would be beneficial, even if it wasn’t a moneymaker.

“It would offset greenhouse gas emissions; it would be a pioneer in the Southeast in terms of coastal wind installations,” Wolff said. “And it would give the possibility of developing a pilot study of how one small turbine in a sensitive area impacts wildlife.”

But he’s ready to give up the fight. Other sites have been rejected as too close to houses or lacking in wind. And without Garbett’s vote, the proposal is a “dead duck,” he said. Wolff expected to call the corporate donor, which has remained unnamed at its request to avoid negative publicity, and decline the offer Tuesday.

“As a public official I cannot impose that kind of risk on taxpayers,” Wolff said. “There are too many variables to depend on an economic benefit. Absent that benefit I don’t think it’s a viable project in terms of overall benefit to the community.”

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
deestafford
23984
Points
deestafford 02/19/14 - 09:43 am
2
1
Ain't it funny how the feel-good ideas of liberals...

Ain't it funny how the feel-good ideas of liberals crumble and blow away with the wind when they are put to a cost/benefit analysis?

Wind power would have already been widely in use and funded by the private sector if it were feasible and cost effective.

Notice how the liberal said that it's still a good idea if it is not monetarily feasible because it would show good intentions. Liberals/Greenies always want to spend other peoples money on "good intentions".

dichotomy
30750
Points
dichotomy 02/19/14 - 11:39 am
1
1
When you look behind the

When you look behind the curtains at all of these greenie weenie projects, protests, and government programs you will always find a rich greenie weenie who is already financially comfortable and does not have to worry about paying THEIR electric bill or taxes.

All greenie weenie projects and government social welfare programs are ALWAYS paid for by the middle and lower middle class WORKING FOLKS. And NONE of these projects and programs ever pass the smell test of a cost/benefit analysis.

corgimom
28293
Points
corgimom 02/20/14 - 09:23 am
0
0
Those things are awful, they

Those things are awful, they make a disturbing sound.

I wouldn't say that was a "liberal" idea, it was an idea worth investigation. They investigated it, found it wasn't a good idea, decided against it.

Nothing liberal about that. I'd say they have a pretty good form of government there.

Back to Top

Top headlines

Property tax jump OK'd

Augusta commissioners broke a seven-year trend Wednesday and agreed 7-0 to raise property taxes by 1.75 mills to cover a deficit and provide employees a small bonus.
Search Augusta jobs