Scott MichauxSports columnist for The Augusta Chronicle. |

Michaux: College football teams need to beef up schedules

  • Follow College

College football has finally settled down – for the most part – into five major conferences. Those five might opt to rescue a team or two from the under-affiliated ranks, but for the near future there is relative reshuffling peace at last.

Now the expansion focus in our little corner of the football world turns inward instead of outward – namely whether or not to expand the conference football schedules to nine games to accommodate the added inventory. It is not a cut-and-dried decision by any means.

But it should be. With the pending influx of revenues from the coming playoff era, dedicated conference networks and the Southeastern Conference-Big 12 model for unaffiliated “bowl” unions, it’s time to stop kowtowing to outdated constraints and beef up the schedules.

This should be the era of pleasing the fans and not appeasing reluctant coaches. Going to a nine-game conference schedule should be just the starting point – limiting the games that don’t matter while increasing the ones that should.

“I’m not opposed to a different scheduling model,” SEC commissioner Mike Slive said recently as the debate rumbles toward the conference’s upcoming spring meetings in Destin, Fla.

For the Pac-12, Big 12 and BIG Ten, the issue has been resolved. The Pac-12 already started doing it last year. For the 10-team Big 12, it was an easy choice as every team played each other, leaving no need for a championship game. The BIG Ten has announced it will go to nine by 2016 and is considering banning all patsy games against Football Championship Subdivision opponents.

That leaves the SEC and Atlantic Coast Conference as the only remaining eight-game holdouts among the major players. That’s not a coincidence considering they have the most overlapping territory in the major football landscape.

The ACC was all set to embrace nine games until it complicated the matter with it’s partial arrangement with Notre Dame. With the Irish committing to only five ACC football matchups a year, the nine-game plan was revoked in October.

The SEC, of course, has its own problems – all of it concentrated in the East Division where Georgia, South Carolina, Florida and Kentucky have historic fixed nonconference rivalry games with in-state ACC opponents Georgia Tech, Clemson, Florida State and Louisville. That wrinkle prompted Alabama’s Nick Saban to call his East brethren “whiners” as he endorsed the nine-game plan. It’s easy for him to say with all the latitude in the world for scheduling.

“There’s certain in-state rivals who are within the league, there’s certain coaches whose instate rivals
are out of the league,” Georgia coach Mark Richt said recently. “That’s why you get a mixture of thought as to what would be the healthiest thing to do.”

For once – don’t get used to it – I agree with Saban.

“I mean, strength of schedule is important, but also, how about the fans?” Saban said. “Don’t they want to see good games and all that?”

It’s time to think more about those fans who have been footing the bill for college athletics for too long with little say in the matter. With directors of athletics carping about the financial need for seven home games and coaches complaining about too many tough foes, fans have had to fork over money for creampuff games that nobody really wants to see. There’s generally two per season, not counting the annual conference doormats that rarely cause the better teams to trip.

With the SEC’s traditional 6-1-1 conference plan (one permanent division crossover and one rotating crossover game), Georgia and South Carolina fans will only get to face Alabama or Louisiana State or Texas A&M once home-and-home every 12 years. Entire classes of Bulldogs and Gamecocks will go without facing some marquee West Division programs.

Nine conference games would reduce that window to six years.

“It could go to nine,” South Carolina coach Steve Spurrier said. “Whatever they say is fine with me.”

That should be the attitude of all coaches. Instead of griping about a schedule that’s too tough, work on legislating a more level playing field with everybody. Pass conference rules that limit nonconference games against teams outside the five major conferences to two or even one.

Perhaps do as the BIG Ten is considering and ban playing FCS teams, ensuring strength-of-schedule won’t be an issue when the playoff selection committee starts weighing the conference elites.

That’s a little tougher for the ACC, which will have teams rotating games against Notre Dame. If there are only three nonconference opportunities, there would be seasons when Clemson would have only one option other than the Irish and Gamecocks.

From the perspective of the fan buying the tickets and paying the cable fees that produce all that revenue, would that really be a problem?

You think the players will be crying “When do we get a break? Bring on Buffalo.”

It would be even better if more schools would put aside petty squabbles and reestablish old traditional rivalries (Texas A&M-Texas, Missouri-Kansas, Oklahoma-Nebraska, Pitt-Penn State) or lock in new regional ones (Tennessee-Virginia Tech, Alabama-West Virginia, LSU-Texas Tech, Arkansas-Oklahoma State) that make the whole tapestry of college football even stronger.

Of course there will have to be some sacrifices made. Some seasons would only have six home games (Georgia-Florida would need to move to home stadiums). Ten-win seasons would be tougher to come by but more precious when accomplished. Coaches might be forced to feel a little more pressure to earn their $4 million salaries.

But with all the money the SEC and ACC will be making in this new college football era, it’s time to give something back to the fans and players who make the sport great in the first place.

After all the upheaval, it’s time to settle in to our new conference homes even more than ever.

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Just My Opinion
Just My Opinion 05/16/13 - 05:07 pm
You know, I am one who

You know, I am one who actually loves it when Georgia plays a "patsy team", because it's usually a fun game, with alot of points, not much pressure, and the younger players have a chance to get on the field. But the fact is that prices HAVE gone up...and they're still going up! Georgia has been working on a plan to soon increase either the donation levels or the ticket costs.....and this is happening when unprecedented NEW dollars will be coming in from the planned SEC Network! In other words, the BUSINESS of college football keeps on keeping on, regardless of the difficulties of the fans being able to put their share of monies into it! So, you know what, I've changed my stance on this topic. Increase the amount of conference games, get rid of the Div. II teams on our schedules, and do what they need to do to increase the strength-of-schedule formula so that we're all on a level playing field! The fans DO deserve better.
Course, I can immediately see 2 things happening from this...first off the Div. II schools will be crying because they will be without the MILLIONS of dollars that they "earn" from playing the big schools every season. Some of them desperately need that money. The other thing that WILL happen, sooner or later, is that people will still be complaining about strength of schedule differences! SEC East has Vandy and Kentucky, while SEC West has Ole Miss and Miss State....none of which could really be considered perennial powerhouses. At least both divisions have 2 of those teams, and, to be honest, all 4 of those teams can be considered "dangerous" and "improving potential threats".

Scott, you need to do an article on how the NCAA can improve the "fan experience" at the games. So many fans are willing to ditch their season tickets and just stay home with their big-screen TVs, no parking hassles, and the list goes on. The NFL has recognized the need to bring the fan out of his "Man Cave" and get him back into the stadium!

Riverman1 05/16/13 - 08:30 pm
More reasons why Ga Southern

More reasons why Ga Southern was right to go FBS. That also brings up the next issue. Schools like Furman, Citadel and Wofford have to make the jump to FBS, too. They are going to be left out and delegated to small time football when their programs are too good for that. The Southern Conference is now openly saying they make no money even when teams play in the FCS playoffs. If you are not FBS, you will soon be relegated to games played on fields illuminated by fans turning their car lights on the field.

Keep in mind, there's hope of building a program when you go FBS. Florida State use to play a small time schedule, but they gradually grew their program to a national championship. They tied Citadel 0-0 in Charleston once before embarking on the bigtime. Va Tech (VPI) ditto. West Virginia left the SoConf in 1968. It can be done.

Riverman1 05/16/13 - 08:26 pm
I wasn't going to say a word

I wasn't going to say a word about the 1-AA, :).

Back to Top
Search Augusta jobs